My questions stem from my experience with a studio strobe kit rental
(story below).
1.) What things would I need to rent to shoot a single person
(whole body to headshot)? i.e. handheld light meter(I now know I need
this), 1200W/s kit w/ 2 strobes vs. 2400W/s w/ 2 strobes, etc.
2.) What are some basic steps/controls of a studio flash kit?
i.e. I know there is a modeling light and a strobe, and you can
control the intensity of the strobe and the modeling light.
3.) Are there any hard and fast rules for delivering conservative
results? (I know this is a question that might have either no answer
or thousands, Im crossing my fingers (again) for one.)
4.) What should I buy? Should I have a gray card? Or can I skip
this? If I can fork out the cash for the light meter, should I
invest? I plan to do more studio shots, while I find existing light
photos more satisfying (and thus I am a neophyte w/r/t flash), but I
hope to pay off some of my equipment with a paying job or two down
the road.
My Story... (sad but true)
This weekend I took one step forward too many
I was shooting a
friend for an annual postcard, and I decided to rent a studio strobe
kit to enhance our results. The kicker is that I have never used a
studio strobe
Yes, I took a step forward into the dark. I quickly
realized, as the strobe illuminated my location, I had stepped off
quite the precipice.
When I rented the kit, a Calumet 1200 w/ two strobes and umbrella
reflectors, I was given little guidance. I walked into the store at
5:30PM on Friday; 30 min prior to their close and the regular
rental guy had gone home early. I had a choice: take what I was
given or go home empty handed. I chose the first option. I also
rented a camera-mounted flash as a failsafe.
I brought the whole kit (less the reflectors, the fill in rental
guy could not find them) home to figure it out for myself. When my
girlfriend got home I set the whole kit up to burn some film to see
if I could use the kit up for the actual shoot on Sunday. I
discovered that I was short one of the strobe power cords, which go
to the strobe from the power pack. The stands, I learned later were
background stands, did not fit the strobes stand mounts. I figured
out how to mount the one light I could power up with an umbrella and
started firing. I shot three rolls of film using various lenses
while moving various switches and dials (I did not have an
instruction manual, nor did I expect one). Luckily, I favor the side
light look I expected from the one strobe. I brought those rolls
into a mini-lab and crossed my fingers.
The prints I got back were acceptable, yet while I was using my 80-
200 f/2.8 lens every frame was under exposed. I wish I knew which
combination of on camera and power pack alterations I made to cause
the under exposure, but that is my own fault.
I brought my new knowledge to the shoot and crossed my fingers
again. After a few rolls and some more discovery we felt like we had
enough to work with. We also shot a roll with the camera-mounted
flash, again as a failsafe.
Of the prints we got, all were pretty good, barring the normal not
it shots. I did have a few shots that were blown out and I had a
few that were a little strange, but not overexposed. All the shoots
that we chose as finalists for the post cards were from the camera-
mounted flash. I dont think that was a function of the lighting as
much as it was from my comfort in composing the shots I wanted with a
much more known light source.
Thanks for any input. (Questions at top)
LA