A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > B&W Photo - Film & Processing > Rollei Retro 400S - bad for...

Featured Equipment Deals

The July Monthly Project Read More

The July Monthly Project

For July's monthly project, Tom Persinger is joining us again to explore the quality of light and how to use it effectively in our photographs. Please add your photo to the thread and enjoy the...

Latest Equipment Articles

Sun Position Tracking Apps Read More

Sun Position Tracking Apps

These 5 apps, ranging in price from free to $8.99, are our top picks for tracking sun (and moon) light. Also ranging in complexity, some help you keep tabs on the ideal lighting of the day while...

Latest Learning Articles

25 Exhilarating Photos of Airplanes Read More

25 Exhilarating Photos of Airplanes

By land and by air, photo.net members have captured stunning shots of airplanes at soaring heights, performing incredible stunts, and in breathtaking locales.


Rollei Retro 400S - bad for pushing

C Barey , Jul 11, 2011; 01:54 a.m.

I tried to push a roll of this one stop and it already looked like too much. Anyone have a similar experience?

Responses

Jean-Yves Mead , Jul 11, 2011; 09:19 a.m.

I've always found R400S to be a fine film at box speed (especially if one intends to scan the negative), but pretty much impossible to push.

Robert Vonk , Jul 11, 2011; 03:30 p.m.

Yes, +1F is the limit for the 400S (Gevaert aviation film). If you want a Rollei type like Tri-X 400, you have to try the Rollei RPX 400 film in RPX-D developer. E.I. 1600 is no problem.... and even more.
On the other hand Retro 400S is sharp en nice in contrast.

Tomasz Klimkiewicz , Jul 11, 2011; 05:40 p.m.

Right, I've had very satisfactory results with Retro 400S, but even developing it in FX-37 I prefer to use E.I. = 200. Then, with an appropriately short dev time, I get high quality, wonderfully sharp negatives with no visible grain (at least for the network presentation purposes).


Minolta X-300, MD Rokkor 35mm/2.8, YO x3 filter, FX-37 1 + 5, 6 min. @ 22 deg. C

Back to top

Notify me of Responses