A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Canon EOS > EOS Lenses > EF 35-135 f/4-5.6 lense

Featured Equipment Deals

Latest Equipment Articles

4 Outdoor & Adventure Photo Packs Read More

4 Outdoor & Adventure Photo Packs

Photo packs have come a long way in the past decade, especially those that are targeted toward outdoor and adventure photographers. Alaska-based adventure photographer Dan Bailey takes a closer look...

Latest Learning Articles

A Brief History of Photography - Part II (Video Tutorial) Read More

A Brief History of Photography - Part II (Video Tutorial)

This video explores the second half of photography's history and development from the technological advances in the late 1800s through the beginnings of digital photography at the end of the 20th...


EF 35-135 f/4-5.6 lense

Rob Berman , Aug 26, 2004; 01:43 a.m.

I have an old Canon EF 35-135 f/4-5.6 lense that I would like to use with a Digital Rebel. Is this lense suitable for the camera. I know that it will fit, but don't want to match a good body with a bad lense. I am a point and shoot kind of guy looking for nice pictures.

Please advise.

Responses

Dan Funk , Aug 26, 2004; 02:11 a.m.

EF 35-135mm f/4-5.6 USM

This is one of the few reviews I have seen of the lens.
http://emedia.leeward.hawaii.edu/frary/toolbox2.htm#35-135Anchor

--

Puppy Face , Aug 26, 2004; 04:05 a.m.

Hey, that's my review!

Yes, the EF 35-135 USM is a fine optic with ring-type USM and FTM. It was released in 1990 as the kit lens for the EOS 10S and was among the first 3 consumer ring-type USM lenses Canon made. Although the max aperture is a bit small, it makes up for it with its tiny size, light weight and nimble AF. Optically, it's in the same ball park as the EF 28-105 3.5-4.5 USM (the kit lens for the 1992 EOS 5/A2). It behaves like a 50-200 zoom on a Dreb, so it makes for a nice walkaround if you're not into wide angle.

Richard Snyder , Aug 26, 2004; 10:04 a.m.

I owned the 35-135mm lens at one time and found it to be a very fine performer on film camera bodies. I do not have any experience with it on digital bodies. The only reason I sold the lens was to move to the 28-135mm IS lens.

If you already have it, I would try it out before investing any money in something new.

Ian Riches , Aug 26, 2004; 11:17 a.m.

I have the 35-135 f/4-5.6 USM. Plus points are:

1) Full-time manual
2) Fast, USM focusing
3) Reasonable image quality, especially at the shorter end and when stopped down.

Minuses for me are:

1) My lens seems to get rather soft when wide open at the 135mm end.
2) Although focus is very rapid, it seems to struggle to get a focus lock a bit more than my 28-70 f/3.5-4.5. Maybe the cause is the smaller maximum apertures are letting in less light for the autofocus sensors to play with?
3) Manual focus ring, although having a reasonable feel, has a very short range of travel. My aforementioned 28-70, although feeling like it's got bearings made of sand, allows much easier fine control of manual focusing.

Bob Atkins , Aug 26, 2004; 09:48 p.m.

I had one many years ago. It was OK, not spectacular. It will be fine on a Digital Rebel,

Peter Jones , Feb 04, 2007; 08:36 a.m.

Found this posst in browsing and I have one of these lenses which I have used since 1990 when I bought a Canon eos 10. It is still in use with the 400d. It gives sharp images with good contrast - can anybody ask for more. It is many many times supierior to the kit lens in every way.

Back to top

Notify me of Responses