A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Canon EOS > EOS Lenses > 85 1.8 vs 100 2.0

Featured Equipment Deals

2015 Mother's Day Gift Guide Read More

2015 Mother's Day Gift Guide

If your mom is always there for you, with camera in hand, then this is the gift guide for her! This list of top photo gear picks will help you make mom's day.

Latest Equipment Articles

Nikon D750 Review Read More

Nikon D750 Review

Nikon introduced the D750, the first full-frame DSLR to feature a tilting LCD and built-in Wi-Fi, in September 2014. In this in-depth review Shun Cheung discusses the ins and outs of this new offering...

Latest Learning Articles

Faces of Photo.net Slideshow Read More

Faces of Photo.net Slideshow

This selection of 25 faces is from the distinct collection of portraits on photo.net by our member photographers.


85 1.8 vs 100 2.0

James O'Gara , Oct 24, 2004; 03:26 p.m.

The subject line pretty much says it all -- I'm trying to decide on a portrait lens, and wonder if there are paritsans of either of these designs. the difference in focal length is not my concern; either an 85 or a 100 is fine for my purposes.

Thanks in advance!

Responses


    1   |   2   |   3     Next    Last

Mathew Baker , Oct 24, 2004; 03:36 p.m.

Are you shooting film or digital, If digital, what magnifacation rate?

Daniel Taylor , Oct 24, 2004; 03:38 p.m.

The focal length difference isn't that significant, but the 85 f/1.8 is notably sharper wide open. For that reason alone I would go with it.

Stephen Sullivan , Oct 24, 2004; 03:51 p.m.

Find a rental house that will allow you to rent both lenses. Do a quick shoot, look at the results and buy which you prefer.

Donny Jatisambogo , Oct 24, 2004; 04:08 p.m.

You might like to consider 85mm f/1.2, instead...

James O'Gara , Oct 24, 2004; 04:09 p.m.

Thanks, Stephen, but actually I was seeking information from people with first hand experience with one or both lenses.

Giampi . , Oct 24, 2004; 04:22 p.m.

I have the 85 and had the 100. I kept the 85 because I felt it was superior in resolution & contrast.

There's an actual test somwhere on the NET (I believe it may be Castlemann site) where those two lenses are compares in a legit, scientific way and, again, the 85 came out on top, if I recall correctly.

Strangely enough, there are sites which rate the 100 above the 85...so, you are now back to where you started ;)

Rodolfo Negrete , Oct 24, 2004; 04:54 p.m.

I have the 85mm 1.8 and are better than my 24-70 2.8,17-40,50/1.8,35-80/3.5 and the 28-75/2.8. the pictures are have a beatiful blurry background,the colors are kind of more contrasty,and sharper.

if you do a search on this lens you will find that they are higly reagarded.

other lens that are as good or better are the 135/2

but if you buy the 85 I can promise you one thing,You will not regret it.

Thierry Fortier , Oct 24, 2004; 05:00 p.m.

The link for the article is

www.wlcastleman.com/equip/reviews/85_100_135/index.htm

85mm 1.8 is a killer lens. Silent, crazy fast motor, light and sharp sharp sharp. I always bring with me.

Tommy Lee , Oct 24, 2004; 05:54 p.m.

I have a 85/1.8. I bought it new from B&H. I don't find my copy sharp wide open. It is not soft but I wouldn't call it sharp either. I still like it as is. It has good size, weight and focus speed. My copy is fairly sharp from f5.6 and on.


    1   |   2   |   3     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses