A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Canon EOS > EOS Lenses > 85 1.8 vs 100 2.0

Featured Equipment Deals

21 Animals with Personality Read More

21 Animals with Personality

Animal photos induce smiles while reducing blood pressure, so bookmark these 21 adorable creatures for your next stressful day.

Latest Equipment Articles

4 Go-To Photo-Editing Apps Read More

4 Go-To Photo-Editing Apps

There are an overwhelming number of photo-editing apps out there. Where to begin? We asked 4 photographers who love shooting with their smartphones to each recommend their #1 go-to app in their mobile...

Latest Learning Articles

Portrait Photography - Part II (Video Tutorial) Read More

Portrait Photography - Part II (Video Tutorial)

Learn the basics of Portrait Photography in Part II of this video tutorial, covering the essentials on timing, posing, and cropping.


85 1.8 vs 100 2.0

James O'Gara , Oct 24, 2004; 03:26 p.m.

The subject line pretty much says it all -- I'm trying to decide on a portrait lens, and wonder if there are paritsans of either of these designs. the difference in focal length is not my concern; either an 85 or a 100 is fine for my purposes.

Thanks in advance!

Responses


    1   |   2   |   3     Next    Last

Mathew Baker , Oct 24, 2004; 03:36 p.m.

Are you shooting film or digital, If digital, what magnifacation rate?

Daniel Taylor , Oct 24, 2004; 03:38 p.m.

The focal length difference isn't that significant, but the 85 f/1.8 is notably sharper wide open. For that reason alone I would go with it.

Stephen Sullivan , Oct 24, 2004; 03:51 p.m.

Find a rental house that will allow you to rent both lenses. Do a quick shoot, look at the results and buy which you prefer.

Donny Jatisambogo , Oct 24, 2004; 04:08 p.m.

You might like to consider 85mm f/1.2, instead...

James O'Gara , Oct 24, 2004; 04:09 p.m.

Thanks, Stephen, but actually I was seeking information from people with first hand experience with one or both lenses.

Giampi . , Oct 24, 2004; 04:22 p.m.

I have the 85 and had the 100. I kept the 85 because I felt it was superior in resolution & contrast.

There's an actual test somwhere on the NET (I believe it may be Castlemann site) where those two lenses are compares in a legit, scientific way and, again, the 85 came out on top, if I recall correctly.

Strangely enough, there are sites which rate the 100 above the 85...so, you are now back to where you started ;)

Rodolfo Negrete , Oct 24, 2004; 04:54 p.m.

I have the 85mm 1.8 and are better than my 24-70 2.8,17-40,50/1.8,35-80/3.5 and the 28-75/2.8. the pictures are have a beatiful blurry background,the colors are kind of more contrasty,and sharper.

if you do a search on this lens you will find that they are higly reagarded.

other lens that are as good or better are the 135/2

but if you buy the 85 I can promise you one thing,You will not regret it.

Thierry Fortier , Oct 24, 2004; 05:00 p.m.

The link for the article is

www.wlcastleman.com/equip/reviews/85_100_135/index.htm

85mm 1.8 is a killer lens. Silent, crazy fast motor, light and sharp sharp sharp. I always bring with me.

Tommy Lee , Oct 24, 2004; 05:54 p.m.

I have a 85/1.8. I bought it new from B&H. I don't find my copy sharp wide open. It is not soft but I wouldn't call it sharp either. I still like it as is. It has good size, weight and focus speed. My copy is fairly sharp from f5.6 and on.


    1   |   2   |   3     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses