5D vs 1Ds(mkI) direct comparison.

ilia . , Oct 07, 2005; 09:31 p.m.

Recieved my 5D last week and decided to compare it to 1Ds before I get rid of one of them.

Large photo attachment:
(Noise @ ISO800 - 1Ds holds it's ground surprisingly well -- 800 x 800 photo)

Responses

1 | 2 | 3 Next Last

ilia . , Oct 07, 2005; 09:32 p.m.

Center sharpness(85/1.2L @ f5.6)

Looks about the same

Large photo attachment:
(85mm f1.2 @ f5.6 1/13s -- 800 x 800 photo)

ilia . , Oct 07, 2005; 09:34 p.m.

Corner sharpness with 16-35mm @ f5.6 and dynamic range

Sharpness is about the same, but 5D pulls a little more detail in highlights

Large photo attachment:
(16-35@ 16mm f5.6 -- 797 x 800 photo)

ilia . , Oct 07, 2005; 09:36 p.m.

All of the above shot @ ISO100(except for noise comparison) in RAW, and converted using Photoshop CS2 Raw converter exactly the same way for both cameras

Jean-Philippe Allard , Oct 07, 2005; 09:41 p.m.

Well umm, okay?

Go shoot some pictures, maybe?

Puppy Face , Oct 07, 2005; 09:57 p.m.

Hee haa!

Vincent Forrester , Oct 08, 2005; 06:33 a.m.

CA ?

Hi,

On one of your pictures the white fence shows CA on both cameras. Does CA occur on white subjects against dark backgrounds? As I often read on here that CA occurs on DARK objects (most common one tree branches) against light backgrounds (Typically the Sky).

Or am I being daft and is the fence not showing CA but something entirely different?

Just trying to learn a bit more on the technical side of things.

Thanks

sparkie , Oct 08, 2005; 07:17 a.m.

thanks fo rthe comparison. very Interesting. so which one will you keep?

ilia . , Oct 08, 2005; 10:53 a.m.

Sparkie - My 1Ds is already listed in classifieds section.

Vincent - both show about the same small amount of CA, it's easily fixable in photoshop raw converter(I just didn't bother to fix it in this case).

ilia . , Oct 08, 2005; 11:02 a.m.

here's the same image with CA ajusted during raw conversion

Attachment: CA_fixed.jpg

1 | 2 | 3 Next Last

Notify me of Responses