A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Canon EOS > EOS Lenses > 1.4x extender II with 24-70...

Featured Equipment Deals

A Brief History of Photography - Part I (Video Tutorial) Read More

A Brief History of Photography - Part I (Video Tutorial)

This video tutorial gives a succinct overview of the discovery and development of photography from the origins of the camera obscura through the Daguerrotype process. Next week's tutorial will cover...

Latest Equipment Articles

Nikon D750 Review Read More

Nikon D750 Review

Nikon introduced the D750, the first full-frame DSLR to feature a tilting LCD and built-in Wi-Fi, in September 2014. In this in-depth review Shun Cheung discusses the ins and outs of this new offering...

Latest Learning Articles

Faces of Photo.net Slideshow Read More

Faces of Photo.net Slideshow

This selection of 25 faces is from the distinct collection of portraits on photo.net by our member photographers.


1.4x extender II with 24-70 2.8

Larry Rech , Nov 01, 2006; 07:29 p.m.

Has anyone tried using a 24-70 with the 1.4 extender? Does it work good. The reason for asking is I would prefer to get the 24-70 2.8 rather than the 24-105 4.0. The 24-70 with the extender would essentially give the same coverage at the long end when needed.

Responses

Steve Torelli , Nov 01, 2006; 07:46 p.m.

Larry, I'm pretty certain that the 24-70 is not compatible with either of Canon's telextenders. It only works with tele primes over 135mm and the 70-200 series and 100-400 zooms AFAIK. Good luck.

Leopold Stotch , Nov 01, 2006; 07:47 p.m.

I tried it myself in September. It won't physically fit. Sorry.

Leopold Stotch , Nov 01, 2006; 08:01 p.m.

Just another note, if you were to put the extender on (which you can't anyway) It would become a 34-98 f/4 anyway. So basically what I'm saying is: The 24-105 f/4 IS is the better choice. Also, if you are mounting it on a 1.6x body, you get the extension anyway. Good luck with it:)

Jim Moloney , Nov 01, 2006; 08:15 p.m.

Thats what I had in mind for the 5D and 24/70 to compansate for the 1.6 crop but the guy at B&H told me it would not work and even if it did it would make the AF focus slower I need to make the AF focus faster if anything.

Philip To , Nov 01, 2006; 11:20 p.m.

I have just tested my 24-70 with the Kenko 1.4x Teleplus Pro 300. The autofocus is as fast as without the TC. Since the 24-70 is big, long and heavy, adding the TC will make the lens even longer and thus more difficult to hold the camera, lens and TC combination. I think the 24-105 is much better if you want longer reach.

Mike Smith , Nov 02, 2006; 03:49 a.m.

3rd party tc will work, the Canon ones won't due to the front elements extending beyond end of tc housing.

Mark U , Nov 02, 2006; 04:28 a.m.

Why not get the 100mm f/2 instead of trying to use a TC? You'd have a lot more flexibility with the fast aperture, and much better performance in every way than the 24-105 at the long end (less distortion, more resolution, less CA, less vignetting...).

Back to top

Notify me of Responses