A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Canon EOS > EOS Digital SLR Bodies > Best Wireless Remote Release...

Featured Equipment Deals

Nikon 24-85mm/f3.5-4.5 AF-S VR Lens Review Read More

Nikon 24-85mm/f3.5-4.5 AF-S VR Lens Review

Photo.net Nikon editor Shun Cheung reviews the new Nikon 24-85mm/f3.5-4.5 AF-S VR Lens lens.

Latest Equipment Articles

Sun Position Tracking Apps Read More

Sun Position Tracking Apps

These 5 apps, ranging in price from free to $8.99, are our top picks for tracking sun (and moon) light. Also ranging in complexity, some help you keep tabs on the ideal lighting of the day while...

Latest Learning Articles

State of the ART: Rag Mama Rag! Read More

State of the ART: Rag Mama Rag!

In his latest exploration, fine art photographer Pete Myers reviews and compares some of the highest quality rag-based photographic papers on the market today.


Best Wireless Remote Release for Digital Rebel XT?

Christopher Oquist , Jun 23, 2008; 11:42 a.m.

Hi,

I'm trying to find a solid, reliable wireless release for my 350D. I tried searching the forums but there wasn't much of a discussion on how these work or what the best products are. Are there any inexpensive wireless releases that work most of the time and all you to auto-focus (depress shutter halfway)? I looked on B&H but this thing didn't seem to have great reviews:

(link)

I'd like a remote release for night/landscape/long exposure photography, and figure a wireless one would also allow me to take self-portraits outdoors (hiking/travelling).

Does anyone have experience with a good one?

Chris

Responses

Rob Bernhard , Jun 23, 2008; 11:58 a.m.

Is there a reason you're not interested in the RC-1 made by Canon?

Christopher Oquist , Jun 23, 2008; 12:27 p.m.

No reason - I guess I didn't come across it. Just checked it out, and it looks like what I'm looking for, thanks.

Do you know if there is a model with a range longer than 16ft? Do these generally allow you to take photos in rapid succession? I know little about these kinds of releases.

Thanks!

Chris

Brad - , Jun 23, 2008; 01:14 p.m.

Anybody have experience with some of the RF-based remotes? Seems the RC-1 is optical and needs line of sight to the front of the camera.

John G , Jun 23, 2008; 01:36 p.m.

Christopher Oquist , Jun 23, 2008; 03:00 p.m.

Has anyone used the Pictosnap? RF-based and one press of the button apparently both focuses and releases the shutter? http://www.pictosnap.com/

Summer Leif , Jun 23, 2008; 03:40 p.m.

I own one of the following radio frequency wireless shutter release units. It was inexpensive at $109.95, and it works very well.

http://www.adorama.com/CZDRHSCA.html

Mark U , Jun 23, 2008; 03:56 p.m.

http://photonotes.org/reviews/radio-remotes/

It seems as though the Phottix ones may be a good option. I think they have a new version out that optionally mounts the receiver in the hotshoe. They also do a much more reasonably priced timer remote than the Canon TC 80N3.

Michael Hultström , Jun 23, 2008; 05:19 p.m.

As for the best, it is probably the Pocket Wizard. Gonna be the most expensive as well.

/M

Kristy Duggan , Jun 25, 2008; 10:33 a.m.

RC-1 made by Canon (on my Rebel XT)

I've had this for about 2 years. I avoid using it; because every time I've needed a remote trigger, I've been frustrated with it's limitations. The trigger has to be held in front of the camera and when I was shooting self portraits with my children, it was very unreliable. It probably only triggered the shutter about 1 out of 4 times. I had to have the trigger in the photo in order to activate the camera.

I would suggest that this remote is ONLY good for close-up self portraits (as long as children are not in the photo). I wanted it for portrait photography to allow me to step away from the camera but I guess I need to upgrade to an add-on system. I can't afford the Pocket Wizard but I might check out the link Summer posted.

Back to top

Notify me of Responses