James Glucksman , Jul 23, 2008; 08:42 p.m.
I am going to be attending the Olympics in Beijing (where I live, by the way), and plan to use my 5D to take some shots. My longest lens
now is the 70-300 f/3.5-5.6 DO IS, which I fear may be too slow to shoot handheld in some of the venues (no tripods allowed, I believe).
Am I mistaken, or should I try something else? If the latter, what do you recommend, bearing in mind that I'd like to be able to use the
lens even after the O's leave town...
Thanks!
James
Bob Atkins 

, Jul 23, 2008; 08:44 p.m.
The 100-400/4.5-5.6L IS USM would seem to be the obvious choice. Longer than that the lenses get very heavy, very expensive and very conspicuous. You don't want to be trying to hand hold a 500/4L for very long. The 400/4DO IS is smaller, but I think a zoom will be more useful.
If you don't mind 3rd party lenses, Sigma now have a stabilized 150-500mm F5-6.3 DG OS for around $1000 which might be interesting.
Michael Harris , Jul 23, 2008; 09:01 p.m.
You may need to leave it at home, they are not allowing "pro" gear without press passes. There is a thread about it here somewhere.
Charles Becker
, Jul 23, 2008; 09:05 p.m.
Richard "Dick" Tope
, Jul 23, 2008; 09:06 p.m.
You might want to do some research as to whether or not you'll be able to bring a 5D into the venue.
http://en.beijing2008.cn/spectators/n214263111.shtml
The 5th item under 'House Rule 2' might preclude bringing it in. The last item under Rule 4 regarding flash photography could affect you as well. As a real stretch a 5D might be considered to be 'professional recording equipment' referenced under Rule 5.
Charles Becker
, Jul 23, 2008; 09:10 p.m.
sorry the link wasn't 'live' but Richard's is better anyway; perhaps a point and shoot will have to do though the shutter lag is
such a pain! cb :-)
Will Hore-Lacy , Jul 23, 2008; 09:19 p.m.
Clearly you need on of these
But more seriously, sigma as have a new 120-400mm which may work for you, another thought is a canon 300mm f4 with
teleconverter, now I don't think I've ever seen one, let alone used one but would that be any smaller than the other
options?
Bob Atkins 

, Jul 23, 2008; 09:21 p.m.
Since you live in Beijing, at least you won't have your camera confiscated by customs when you fly into the country, as has been reliably reported is happening now. You get it back when you leave, but it's a hell of a way to welcome tourists.
Things don't look nice over there - (link)
Even Homeland Security hasn't stooped to that level yet. They just confiscate laptops and memory cards - http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnews/seizinglaptopsandcameraswithoutcause
William W 

, Jul 23, 2008; 09:22 p.m.
I am not versed on the exact allowances if any, or not, for spectators to pass security.
I have been (as a spectator) to Previous Games.
From the Canon line up I would initially be looking at the 200F2.8L (or the 135F2L) and having the x1.4 and x2.0 converters in your pocket. If you choose the Canon converters use Black Tape around them. This would be a base as a general lightweight kit, IMO.
I STRONGLY suggest you are aware of the specific allowances to get you past security, and you then have a protocol to confirm those rights, should you initially be refused entry.
As you live in Beijing that will be a lot easier for you than others.
After having clearly identified what you can and can not do, if allowed: I suggest the 70 to 200F2.8LIS and the two converters I mentioned.
My rationale for these choices is predicated on the necessary lens speed you will require, especially for any indoor events.
WW
Bob Atkins 

, Jul 23, 2008; 09:31 p.m.
"and you then have a protocol to confirm those rights"
Somehow I doubt that you'll really be able to insist on your "rights" over there.