Welcome to Photo.net: A Community of Photographers

Community > Forums > Canon EOS > EOS Lenses > Going on vacation and need...

Going on vacation and need lens recommendation

Alexander C , Aug 29, 2008; 11:58 a.m.

There have been multiple threads on this and I feel as I should apologize for the redundancy.

I WANT to get a super wide lens because I do a lot of indoor photography with not a lot of room to back out and I am also into landspace and architectural photography.

I will be going on vacation next week and need to hear what you guys think about the following options. It's got to be a Canon lens as I am not pro third party.

Canon Zoom Super Wide Angle EF 17-40mm f/4L Canon Zoom Super Wide Angle EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5

They are $10 dollars in difference (which is nothing) and have 7mm in focal lenght difference. However, one is an L lens. I own the 70-200 L (non IS) and the picture quaility on this lens is PHENOMENAL. I also have a 28-105 which isn't wide enough which is why I want a wide lens.

Do I go for the L because of the picture quality and lose out on those extra 7mm?

Please share your thoughts.

Thanks.

Responses


    1   |   2     Next    Last

G Dan Mitchell , Aug 29, 2008; 12:03 p.m.

I'd throw the EFS17-55 f/2.8 IS into the mix here. In my view it offers more than the 17-40 (which I own and use on FF and like a great deal) in almost every important way when it comes to a cropped sensor lens.

If you are convinced that you need the ultra wide angle range right away then your obvious choice is the 10-22.

Rainer T , Aug 29, 2008; 12:06 p.m.

What camera body do you use?

Alexander C , Aug 29, 2008; 12:24 p.m.

I use a 40D.

Alexander C , Aug 29, 2008; 12:24 p.m.

Dan, the IS lens is out of my budget. But it sure sounds nice.

Daniel D , Aug 29, 2008; 12:43 p.m.

"They are $10 dollars in difference (which is nothing) and have 7mm in focal length difference."

Those 7mm may not sound like much, but at the wide end 7mm makes a HUGE difference. At 10mm your field of view is almost twice as wide than at 17mm.

Based on your requirement for shooting indoors and in tight spaces I'd say the 10-22 is the answer, no doubt about it. It's very good optically, about as good as it gets.

JDM von Weinberg , Aug 29, 2008; 01:09 p.m.

The only "super wide" you mention; and your ONLY choice, if you must have Canon, is the EF-S 10-20mm.

17mm is only a moderate wide angle on your 40D.

If you want super wide and L glass, you need to buy a 5D or other "full-frame" body plus a 16mm- or 17mm- or so L lens.

Gregory Ferdinandsen , Aug 29, 2008; 01:09 p.m.

It ,ay be price, but for architecture, noting beets the 24 TS-E. Lensrentals.com has a ggod price to rent one. It's certainly not my staple lens, but it gets the shots that no othere cans can.

http://www.lensrentals.com/rent/canon-ts-e-24mm-f3.5-l/for-canon

Jim Strutz - Anchorage, AK , Aug 29, 2008; 01:38 p.m.

You said, "I WANT to get a super wide lens..."

24mm isn't wide at all on a 40D, although a tilt-shift lens can be great for architecture. And as JDM said, "17mm is only a moderate wide angle on your 40D." If you want a super wide Canon lens for a 40D it has to be a EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5. There are no other choices.

If you add in third party lenses there are more choices, but they all start at 12mm or less.

Sinh Nhut Nguyen , Aug 29, 2008; 02:24 p.m.

10-22 = 16-35 on the 40D, and 17-40 = 27-64. 27 is wide, 16 is ultra-wide. Right now the 10-22 seems like the pefect choice.


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses