A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Canon EOS > EOS Lenses > Best Alternative to Canon...

Featured Equipment Deals

The August Monthly Project Read More

The August Monthly Project

For August's monthly project, Tom Persinger is joining us again to explore the various ways of using texture to evoke tactile qualities in our photographs. Please add your photo to the thread and...

Latest Equipment Articles

The Week in Photography News Read More

The Week in Photography News

November 15-21, 2014: Hear the latest goings-on in the photography world, from product releases to event and campaign announcements and more.

Latest Learning Articles

Introduction to Creating an Album in Lightroom - Part I (Video Tutorial) Read More

Introduction to Creating an Album in Lightroom - Part I (Video Tutorial)

Learn to create an album in the Book Tab of Lightroom that you can publish and present to clients.


Best Alternative to Canon 100-400mm L IS

Responses


First     Prev     1   |   2   |   3   |   4   |   5   |   6     Next    Last

Philip Wilson , Oct 20, 2008; 06:12 p.m.

Depends on the camera (Full frame or APS-C) and what you shoot. I shoot a lot of ski racing so I tried a friends 100-400 but was disappointed. The lens is slow to focus (especially when tracking) and does not give very fast shutter speeds. I was also not very impressed by it's edge of frame performance. Thus I bought the 70-200 F2.8 (non-IS to save money) and 1.4x and 2x convertors. the 2x convertor is not worth the money as it is a poor performer but the 1.4x is good on the 70-200. I think that indoor sports may also be a problem as i have a son who plays ice hockey and find F2.8 to be marginal as I can't get better than 1/125 of a second. In general for ice hockey I use an old canon FD with a 85mm F1.2 or 135mm F2 for this purpose (although I miss AF). i still shoot film and will only move to Digital when I get a 5D Mark II later this year. I suspect that the APS-C will help the edge performance (we have a Digital rebel that produces OK pictures with a very poor lens that is unacceptable on my 1Vs). Having an ability to work above 400ISO will also help the digital case (this is one of the reasons I am getting the new 5D). A friend of mine has the 1D Mark IIN and he has both the 100-400 and 70-200 and a rarely see him use the 100-400. I would also be careful of non-Canon lenses if you plan to keep the camera. they are not as compatible as the Canon lenses - for example my Sigma 14mm EOS lens will not work on digital cameras but works on all film EOS cameras whereas Cannon lenses of the same (pre-digital) vintage will work on all EOS cameras. The lens physically fits the Digital camera but the camera will not function.

Len Kocurek , Oct 20, 2008; 09:49 p.m.

Is the push pull zoom a problem when you have the lens mounted on a tripod?

Dan Hall , Oct 21, 2008; 03:51 p.m.

No problem with the push/pull on a tripod. Some undue criticism to the push/pull if you ask me. I love it. It is easy to acquire wildlife then zoom in and get the shot while keeping them in the frame the whole time. Very easy to master.

Len Kocurek , Oct 21, 2008; 09:16 p.m.

Thanks Dan, I actually put my hands on a 100-400 today and now I understand how it works and how it mounts on a tripod. Actually, I think the push/pull system is great. That 100-400 is now residing on my 5D.

Dan Hall , Oct 22, 2008; 10:35 a.m.

Congratulations man. I am sure you will enjoy that lens. When you look at the versatility and focal range of that lens, I consider it a true value. Below are some images from mine. Many are heavily cropped but still fairly sharp. The wildlife images were from Alaska in May. On a boat bobbing around in the ocean and hand held. I would have never got these shots without the 100-400. Keep in mind that I am a beginner with poor post processing skills:) But these images will give you an idea of what the 100-400 will do.

Alaska wildlife

http://www.flickr.com/photos/21144083@N02/sets/72157605295387576/

Birds

http://www.flickr.com/photos/21144083@N02/sets/72157605058865808/

Full moon (click all sizes and open full screen image)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/21144083@N02/sets/72157603945001396/

Sailboats on Nantucket

http://www.flickr.com/photos/21144083@N02/sets/72157606793865957/

Lance McVay , Oct 22, 2008; 03:45 p.m.

I love my 100-400. It's an outstanding lens.

Lance McVay , Oct 22, 2008; 03:49 p.m.

This summer, out on my friend's boat, it was wonderful for whales. He had a 300 IS and had to use two cameras to capture wider shots, but I could just zoom. The push-pull hate, I just don't get it.

Dan Hall , Oct 23, 2008; 10:55 a.m.

Nice shots Lance.

Keith Reeder , Oct 23, 2008; 02:10 p.m.

"However, the 100-400 has a relatively large telephoto magnification range and a twist zoom would be impractical"

Someone needs to tell Sigma (maker of a 50-500mm and a 80-400mm OS), Nikon (80-400mm VR) and Tokina (80-400mm) that - they all have twist zooms.

Geoff Mower , Oct 23, 2008; 06:41 p.m.

"Someone needs to tell Sigma (maker of a 50-500mm and a 80-400mm OS), Nikon (80-400mm VR) and Tokina (80-400mm) that - they all have twist zooms."

Fair enough. I haven't used any of these for comparison. The Canon shifts a lot of glass a long way when it zooms, and to do this with a twist would require either a fairly large angle of rotation, or a lot of torque. Maybe the other lenses have a different (?newer, ? ?better) design.


First     Prev     1   |   2   |   3   |   4   |   5   |   6     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses