A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Canon EOS > 5d MKII & Canon 12-24mm Lens

Featured Equipment Deals

Simple Food Photography Tips for Bloggers Read More

Simple Food Photography Tips for Bloggers

It isn’t the ingredient, temperature, or method of cooking that draws you to click on a fabulous dessert or entrée - it’s the photo. Learn a few tricks of the trade to light, style, and capture...

Latest Learning Articles

Featured Member: Katarzyna Gritzmann Read More

Featured Member: Katarzyna Gritzmann

Photo.net featured member Katarzyna Gritzmann talks about photography and portfolio of images.

5d MKII & Canon 12-24mm Lens

rachael o , Feb 19, 2010; 02:29 p.m.

So I finally got my 5D MKII and have discovered that I cannot use my Canon 12-24mm Lens with it...I have looked all around and I can't find a solution (converter of sorts?)...but thought I would ask the wise community before I sold it...is there something I am missing or is it absolutely incompatible?


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Chris Clarke , Feb 19, 2010; 02:46 p.m.

I didn't know Canon made such a focal length. I think you are talking about a Tokina or Sigma lens, both of which are made for a Canon EF-S mount.
The Canon EF-S 10-22 lens is obviously an EF-S lens and won't physically fit on a FF camera. Only EF mount lenses will fit the 5D2. I have the 16-35 II which is wider on a FF than a 12-24 is on a 1.6 crop.
There are plenty of options on FF for a new lens to fill the gap left by your 12-24.

Joseph Wisniewski , Feb 19, 2010; 02:53 p.m.

A 1.4x teleconverter is usually sufficient to get a lens like that running. I believe the Kenko PRO-300 1.4x will work. But seriously, the optical quality won't be that great, and if you sell the 12-24, combine that money with the money you'd have spent on a good 1.4x TC, you shoudl be able to get a decent FF wide.

Jon Ess , Feb 19, 2010; 03:18 p.m.

you must be referring to a tokina 12-24 f/4, which won't work on full frame cameras, or a sigma 12-24 f/4.5-5.6 which is a full frame lens.

Steven F , Feb 19, 2010; 03:39 p.m.

Rachael, we need to know if you have a Sigma or Tokina lens and what the problem is. Will it attach to the body, is the camera posting an error code, or if there is a problem with the image post an image. Otherwise we are just guessing.

Bob Atkins , Feb 19, 2010; 03:51 p.m.

The Sigma 12-24 should work fine and the Tokina 12-24 should mount and work OK but will severely vignette.

The Sigma 12-24 has full frame coverage. It's not a crop-sensor lens. I suppose there could be software incompatibility with the 5D MkII, since older Sigma lenses have had a long history of requiring rechipping when used on new EOS bodies.

The only superwide zoom you can't mount on a 5D is the Canon EF-S 10-22. Tokina, Tamron and Sigma crop sensor lenses will all mount fine. They'll just vignette badly.

Nathan Gardner , Feb 19, 2010; 05:53 p.m.

there is no Canon 12-24mm. I'd sell whatever lens it is and get the Canon 16-35mm or 17-40mm, both great lenses and the latter more affordable.

M. P. , Feb 19, 2010; 06:46 p.m.

12 * 1.6= 19.2 mm So yes What Nathan said is correct. If the 12-24 is designed whether EFS or not for a crop sensor camera it will still not be as wide as a 16-35 or 17-40 on a 5D Mark II. I personally use the Canon 17-40 F4L on my 5D2 and I really enjoy that lens. I am spoiled now since I have been shoot L-series lenses 85 1.2L, 17-40 F4L, 24-70 F2.8L. i would definetely recommend selling what ever lens that is and upgrading to the one of teh two L-serices lenses recommended above.

Nathan Gardner , Feb 19, 2010; 08:20 p.m.

I don't believe it will be a 19mm on the 5D MkII. 12mm is 12mm. You have to multiply by the crop factor when using a crop camera, but the 5D MkII is not a crop camera so there is no conversion needed, it will still look like a 12mm. However, the quality of this lens will not be up to par with the 16-35mm L and 17-40mm L.

Steve Porte , Feb 20, 2010; 01:14 a.m.

FWIW, I tried the Sigma 12-24 on a 1Ds3 body. It mounted and functioned normally. I didn't buy it, however, because the IQ was a bit weak, especially at the lower end. Didn't seem worth it just to go wider than my 17-40L, which produces great results and is price competitive with the Sigma.

    1   |   2     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses