A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Canon EOS > EOS Lenses > Best Wide Angle lens for 7D

Featured Equipment Deals

Basic Image Development in Lightroom: Special Tools (Video Tutorial) Read More

Basic Image Development in Lightroom: Special Tools (Video Tutorial)

Learn to use the special tools available in Lightroom, including image sharpening, lens corrections, removing chromatic aberration, and adding special effects (distortion, vignetting, and...

Latest Equipment Articles

The Olympus Air A01 Hands-On Review Read More

The Olympus Air A01 Hands-On Review

What if a photographic tool arrived that was the link between smartphones and good photography? That tool might just be the Olympus Air A01.

Latest Learning Articles

The October Monthly Project Read More

The October Monthly Project

This month's project with guest instructor Jackie DiBenedetto helps us practice our skills with nature as the backdrop. Add your best photo to the thread and enjoy the conversation!

Best Wide Angle lens for 7D

J Hickton , Feb 15, 2011; 03:53 p.m.

I want to get a wide angle lens for my 7D which also performs well in low light, after a bit of research the 2 best options seem to be the Canon EF 14mm f/2.8L and the Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8PRO. So I was just wondering if anyone has any experience of these lenses, as I haven’t yet tried out either of them. Also is the much higher cost of the Canon EF 14mm f/2.8L worth it?


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Bueh B. , Feb 15, 2011; 04:02 p.m.

Get the Tokina. It is an excellent super-wide zoom made for APS-C cameras. The EF 14mm is a special full-frame AF ultra-wide built for a field-of-view "where no rectilinear lens has gone before". It is unique and well regarded on full-frame where its optical drawbacks are part of the deal, but for APS-C there are better alternatives.

Alwin Lai , Feb 15, 2011; 04:11 p.m.

Back in my days, the efs 10-22 was considered the standard for UWA. It's ability to control distortion, CA, sharpness were its raison d'etre.

Richard Hatch , Feb 15, 2011; 04:52 p.m.

I check Lensrentals almost every day to see if they have any of their rentals come up for sale. They have a 14mm 2.8
I've rented and purchased lenses from them and highly regard both of these services.
I have a 10-22 and although it is a very nice UWA zoom it is neither fast or tack sharp.
I put a lot of stock in what Roger Cicala has to say about lenses. I think it is worth reading his comparisons of the choices in UWA zooms here.
The Zeiss 21mm 2.8 is a very fine lens with terrific contrast and color and it is very sharp. However, it just isn't wide enough for a lot of shooting people want to do with the 7D.

Geoff Sobering , Feb 15, 2011; 05:35 p.m.

J Hickton , Feb 15, 2011; 06:45 p.m.

Has to be 2.8 for low light work.

Arie Vandervelden , Feb 15, 2011; 07:23 p.m.

What Bueh says. Get the Tokina.

One other lens to consider would be Samyang 14/2.8. I'd still get the Tokina, though.

Mark Pierlot , Feb 15, 2011; 08:25 p.m.

The Samyang 14/2.8 is blindingly sharp across the frame, and costs about six times less than the optically inferior EF 14/2.8 L. But, alas, it's stuck at 14mm, and has manual focus only.

John Crowe , Feb 15, 2011; 10:26 p.m.

The abilities and cost of the Canon EF 14mm f2.8 L are wasted on a crop body. If you intend to go full frame and like the idea of having a superwide angle for it, then it will shine.

I'd have to do a bit of research on crop body wideangles to make further suggestions. The only other one that comes to mind is the Sigma 12-24 ( which also works on full frame ).

Philip Wilson , Feb 15, 2011; 11:01 p.m.

I was not that impressed by the Canon 14mm F2.8 and bought the 16-35F2.8 II and 17mm F4 TS as my wide angles. That said I mainly use them on full frame as they ate not that wide on my 7D. I have seen results from the Tokina 11- 16 and they appear to be quite good. That said the lens owner (a Nikon shooter) says it is more like a prime that a zoom when shooting due to it's limited range. So if you want a fast APS-C lens the Tokina is probably the way to go. Otherwise I suggest you look at the 17 F4 TS or the 16-35 F2.8 II as the 14 F2.8 I tested was quite disappointing for the price

    1   |   2     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses