A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Canon EOS > EOS Bodies > 5d mk II v 5d mk III?

5d mk II v 5d mk III?

Erik Meyer , Jan 27, 2012; 03:35 p.m.

Greetings,

I am currently shooting a Canon 40d and will be upgrading this year and make my 40d the backup. The question that I have is which 5d should I upgrade to? I know the 5d mk III isn't out but I am wondering what features/enhancements would make you instantly purchase a mk III and dump your mk ii? I currently shoot portraits and that will be my primary function for the camera.

Thank you,

Responses


    1   |   2   |   3     Next    Last

Michael Liczbanski , Jan 27, 2012; 04:11 p.m.

Unless the Mk. III makes my morning toast (lightly toasted rey bread, unsalted butter, blueberry preserves, mint leaf garnish) I don't want it :-)

C'mon, cameras are tools, very personal tools, just ask yourself what you needs/want in a camera and decide whether you want an existing model or a nonexisting one. If you don't need a camera right now, wait and see what, and when, happens with the evolution of 5D.

paulie smith , Jan 27, 2012; 04:14 p.m.

A camera you can use is always better than a mirage.

Puppy Face , Jan 27, 2012; 04:27 p.m.

If it was exactly the same but half ECF, I'd buy it in a heartbeat. More MP, iTunes compatibility, zillion AF points, GPS, not so much...

Craig Meddaugh , Jan 27, 2012; 04:28 p.m.

Ummm... pro-level AF (or at least 7D-equivalent) and 5+ fps. Don't see either of those happening (at least at the current price point) so no real worries about having to run off and sell my 5Dii.

Besides, even if we assume that there will be a 5DIII here soon, we have no idea about features, much less the date you can actually get your hands on one. Even if we assume that Canon will start taking orders in March (unlikely, but why not hope), unless you preorder the first day, you will be lucky to have one in your hands by September.

andrew gardiner , Jan 27, 2012; 04:48 p.m.

I think this question has been asked before, check the search button.

Yakim Peled , Jan 27, 2012; 06:04 p.m.

5D2 sensor inside a 7D body will make me instantly buy it. I do not want to feel that I am buying a great sensor wrapped by a mediocre body.

I could nit-pick and say that I'd also welcome a revolving screen a-la 60D, a CF that enables the spot metering to be linked to the active AF point a-la 1-series or venture into fantasy land and ask for a useful AF in video a-la MILC cameras but as I said, these are nit-picking.

Or Canon could make the 7D Mk II with these minor modifications and I'll be asking once again: "Who needs FF?". I shot many portraits with 40D and 7D in the last 4 years and never felt the need to upgrade to FF. May I ask why do you feel that need?

Happy shooting,
Yakim.

G Dan Mitchell , Jan 27, 2012; 06:41 p.m.

I think about this a different way perhaps, given that the features of a potential "5D3" camera are unknown.

If you need a full frame camera now, get the 5D2. For the kinds of photography where it excels, it is an outstanding camera and it can produce top notch image quality.

If you do not need a full frame camera right now, just wait. You have a perfectly functional camera right now that you can continue to use. When such a new camera comes out you can make your decision based on what we actually know about it rather than what we imagine might be true.

Dan

Jos van Eekelen , Jan 27, 2012; 07:09 p.m.

Get the mk-II now and start saving for the mk-III.

Jos van Eekelen , Jan 27, 2012; 07:45 p.m.

Sorry,it's late over here. I meant to say get the mk-II now, start saving for the mk-IV. I have the mk-I, now waiting for the mk-III but YMMV.


    1   |   2   |   3     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses