A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Canon FD > Canon FD 28mm to 55mm 3.5...

Featured Equipment Deals

Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM A Review Read More

Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM A Review

Pro family photographer, Stacy Bostrom, reviews the Sigma 50mm f/1.4. See how this lens stacks up against her tried-and-true favorite.

Latest Equipment Articles

Nikon D810 versus D750: Which to Choose? Read More

Nikon D810 versus D750: Which to Choose?

Both the Nikon D810 and D750 are excellent FX-format DSLRs. Shun Cheung compares the two models to help you choose which one is the right choice for you.

Latest Learning Articles

State of the ART: The Little Lens That Could Read More

State of the ART: The Little Lens That Could

Fine art photographer Pete Myers talks about his love for the Cosina Voigtländer CV ULTRON 40mm SLii, a lens he considers to be "The Little Lens That Could."


Canon FD 28mm to 55mm 3.5 Lense

Kevin M Brennan , Apr 11, 2005; 10:33 a.m.

Just bought a Canon FD 28mm to 55 mm 3.5 zoom lense. Never read any info on it. Has anyone had any experience good or bad with the quality of this lense? How`s the sharpness,contrast or bokra of this lense? Please advise. Thanks

Responses

Duane Kucheran , Apr 11, 2005; 12:19 p.m.

I bought mine used about 2 years ago and use it primarily for snapshots as it's small and yet versatile. I remember reading a review of it that tends to echo my observations. One thing I remember is that the center resolution wasn't as good as some other zooms but that the corner resolution didn't fall off as much.

have a look at this site: http://members.aol.com/canonfdlenstests/default.htm

I'm looking at a print made with one right now. It doesn't have the resolution of a prime but is good considering it's a fairly simple zoom. I'd say it has better contrast than the 35-105 f3.5 but not quite as much as a prime. Because it's a short, slow lens, I don't find it able to blow out the background as well as faster or longer lenses, but nonetheless, the bokek isn't bad. It does make crisp and colorful images and for the price I'm pleased with it.

My sample has quite a bit of distortion on the wide end - I can't remember if it's pincushion or barrel but it's obvious even in the viewfinder. My other lenses in that don't act the same way.

One warning, these lenses are fragile and it's very easy to break it off the camera ahead of the mount. Some samples have been reglued and are even more likely to break.

Cheers,

Duane

Raid W. Amin , Apr 11, 2005; 05:53 p.m.

The 28-50/3.5 is a better made lens that has macro capability. I just know that the 28-50 lens is better than the 28-55 lens. Many years ago, the 28-50 would sell for $300+ in used condition, and the 28-55 would sell for about $150 [in Shutterbug].

Peter Ehrenpreis , Apr 11, 2005; 06:16 p.m.

Great Canon information/site.

Canon FD 28-55mm f/3.5

(link)

Back to top

Notify me of Responses