A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Canon FD > Canon FD 28mm to 55mm 3.5...

Featured Equipment Deals

5 Steps to Creating a Powerful Portrait Read More

5 Steps to Creating a Powerful Portrait

Top wedding photographer Jerry Ghionis is a creative master of using light to create powerfully emotional images. Get a sneak peak of his "Luxurious Light" seminar that he will be presenting at...

Latest Equipment Articles

Sony a6300-First Impressions Read More

Sony a6300-First Impressions

When Sony's invitation to spend a couple of days shooting with the new a6300 in Miami arrived via email, I didn't have to think twice before sending my RSVP. Announced in February and shipping this...

Latest Learning Articles

Featured Member: Alf Bailey Read More

Featured Member: Alf Bailey

Photo.net featured member Alf Bailey talks about his landscape photography and portfolio of images.


Canon FD 28mm to 55mm 3.5 Lense

Kevin M Brennan , Apr 11, 2005; 10:33 a.m.

Just bought a Canon FD 28mm to 55 mm 3.5 zoom lense. Never read any info on it. Has anyone had any experience good or bad with the quality of this lense? How`s the sharpness,contrast or bokra of this lense? Please advise. Thanks

Responses

Duane Kucheran , Apr 11, 2005; 12:19 p.m.

I bought mine used about 2 years ago and use it primarily for snapshots as it's small and yet versatile. I remember reading a review of it that tends to echo my observations. One thing I remember is that the center resolution wasn't as good as some other zooms but that the corner resolution didn't fall off as much.

have a look at this site: http://members.aol.com/canonfdlenstests/default.htm

I'm looking at a print made with one right now. It doesn't have the resolution of a prime but is good considering it's a fairly simple zoom. I'd say it has better contrast than the 35-105 f3.5 but not quite as much as a prime. Because it's a short, slow lens, I don't find it able to blow out the background as well as faster or longer lenses, but nonetheless, the bokek isn't bad. It does make crisp and colorful images and for the price I'm pleased with it.

My sample has quite a bit of distortion on the wide end - I can't remember if it's pincushion or barrel but it's obvious even in the viewfinder. My other lenses in that don't act the same way.

One warning, these lenses are fragile and it's very easy to break it off the camera ahead of the mount. Some samples have been reglued and are even more likely to break.

Cheers,

Duane

Raid W. Amin , Apr 11, 2005; 05:53 p.m.

The 28-50/3.5 is a better made lens that has macro capability. I just know that the 28-50 lens is better than the 28-55 lens. Many years ago, the 28-50 would sell for $300+ in used condition, and the 28-55 would sell for about $150 [in Shutterbug].

Peter Ehrenpreis , Apr 11, 2005; 06:16 p.m.

Great Canon information/site.

Canon FD 28-55mm f/3.5

(link)

Back to top

Notify me of Responses