A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Canon FD > Canon FD 55mm F1.2 SSC...

Featured Equipment Deals

Transformational Imagemaking: An Interview with Robert Hirsch Read More

Transformational Imagemaking: An Interview with Robert Hirsch

Robert Hirsch takes us through history in this interview about his new book, beginning with the groundbreaking 60s to contemporary work of today, featuring artists in his book that "...literally have...

Latest Equipment Articles

Sun Position Tracking Apps Read More

Sun Position Tracking Apps

These 5 apps, ranging in price from free to $8.99, are our top picks for tracking sun (and moon) light. Also ranging in complexity, some help you keep tabs on the ideal lighting of the day while...

Latest Learning Articles

State of the ART: Rag Mama Rag! Read More

State of the ART: Rag Mama Rag!

In his latest exploration, fine art photographer Pete Myers reviews and compares some of the highest quality rag-based photographic papers on the market today.


Canon FD 55mm F1.2 SSC ASPHERICAL - photo's with lens wide open.

Responses


First     Prev     1   |   2    

wayne g , May 08, 2008; 03:47 p.m.

I was also a little surprised at the less than awesome bokeh. I used to have the 55 1.2...the one before they were marked with SSC...and the bokeh was not that bad. An example of people portraits would interesting to see.

Dave S , May 08, 2008; 04:27 p.m.

Look at this old thread. I've had the same experience with my 50/1.2L, which is a similar lens. I actually prefer the out-of-focus rendition I get with the 50/1.4.

Jeff Adler , May 08, 2008; 05:48 p.m.

The photo of the tree lined road would have looked nicer at f/11. The 55/1.2 Aspherical is famous for its high center resolution but some subjects just look better with more depth of field.

Baris John , May 08, 2008; 06:19 p.m.

Thank you so much for posting Dirk. The Asph draws pretty close to the later 50L. Bokeh can be a bit busy, as demonstrated.

Here's the New FD 50/1.2 L


New FD 50/1.2 L at f1.2

Baris John , May 08, 2008; 06:26 p.m.

Later that day


New FD 50/1.2 L at f1.2

Mark Wahlster , May 09, 2008; 10:34 a.m.

The bokeh problem is directly associated with the points of light coming thru the trees you are getting burn out on the film in those points. I would have liked to see the same filtered sunlight shots taken with a 50mm f1.8 or 50mm f1.4 to see how they would have handled the task.

John Crowe , May 10, 2008; 07:15 p.m.

I am very surprised at the very poor bokeh of this lens. It is a lens that I had always wanted as a previous FD user. I have always been very pleased with my Nikon 200/2 and Zeiss 85/1.4 wide open. I have read that critically sharp lenses can be hard to design to provide excellent bokeh at the same time. The 200/2 seems to have achieved this but is also one of the most expensive lenses available. The 85/1.4 appears to have achieved a balance by being relatively soft wide open to provide superb bokeh and razor sharp once stopped down 2 stops.

I too would like to have seen how the other 50mm lenses would have handled the various scenes.


First     Prev     1   |   2    

Back to top

Notify me of Responses