A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Classic Manual Cameras > Agfa Agnar lens quality?

Featured Equipment Deals

Writing a Wedding Story with Must-Have Photographs Read More

Writing a Wedding Story with Must-Have Photographs

Photographer Erik Korver shares his organized breakout of "must-have" wedding shots, with tips and visual inspiration throughout.

Latest Equipment Articles

Sun Position Tracking Apps Read More

Sun Position Tracking Apps

These 5 apps, ranging in price from free to $8.99, are our top picks for tracking sun (and moon) light. Also ranging in complexity, some help you keep tabs on the ideal lighting of the day while...

Latest Learning Articles

Advanced Printing with Lightroom (Video Tutorial) Read More

Advanced Printing with Lightroom (Video Tutorial)

Building upon last week's Basic Printing with Lightroom video tutorial, this advanced printing tutorial will teach you to print contact sheets, print multiple images at a time, use Lightroom's present...


Agfa Agnar lens quality?

Joris Van Looveren , Nov 11, 2004; 09:31 a.m.

I recently bought an Agfa Isola medium-format camera in fine condition at a flea market. It has an Agfa Agnar 75f6.3 lens and Singlo-2 shutter. The first roll I tried (APX 100) was seriously underexposed so I threw it away, but what was on the roll seemed to look promising, so I will try a few more rolls. Does anybody have an idea of the quality of the lens and resulting enlargements? (I currently only have experience with 35mm.)

Responses


    1   |   2     Next    Last

BJ Bignell , Nov 11, 2004; 11:49 a.m.

The Agnar is the lowest-end lens from Agfa, but it's not that bad. Both my Ventura 66 and Ventura 69 folders (Isolettes) have Agnar lenses, and I don't have any complaints.

I usually shoot HP5+, but I did run a roll of 400VC through once; it looked pretty nice. I've never had enlargments past 5x5 proofs, though.

BJ

David Richert , Nov 11, 2004; 12:08 p.m.

If the lens is clean they will shoot surprisingly well. Most of these len's suffer from haze on the elements. Open up the back select "B" and aim the camera at a light source check to see if it's clean. I have had very good luck on a few images up to 14x14 but most look very good at 10x10. Check out some of my AGFA Images at http://davidrichert.com/AGFA%20Manuals/agfa1.htm

Mike Elek , Nov 11, 2004; 12:54 p.m.

As the others said, the Agnar was the lowest-level lens offered.

The Agnar occupied the bottom tier. The Apotar sat in the middle, and the Solinar was the top lens.

As a small amusing note, if someone says, "It's not that bad," you can also infer that "it's not that good," either.

HOWEVER, I think if you keep the lens to f/11 or smaller, you'll be quite pleased by the results, especially if you've only been shooting 35mm. The big negative is a huge benefit.

The most important thing to check is that there are no pinholes in the bellows -- the Agfa medium format folders are notorious for this.

My own experience with the Apotar (Isolette III) is that it's an adequate lens when stopped down. Even when shooting at f/16, images were never as sharp as they should have been.

Lex Jenkins , Nov 11, 2004; 02:28 p.m.

My Isolette has the 85mm f/4.5 Agnar (Pronto shutter) and is surprisingly sharp edge to edge, corner to corner, even wide open. A bit disappointing since I was actually hoping for softer edges and corners.

The tricky bit is guess focusing. That's especially difficult shooting wide open. So I normally shoot at around f/11. I have taken some street shots in low light at f/4.5 but they were a bit blurry from motion (I shoot while walking) or because my judgement of subject distance was off.

Otherwise it's a good lens.

Andrew Yue , Nov 11, 2004; 02:50 p.m.

Sometimes you get incredibly lucky. I recently refurbished an Agfa Ventura 69 for a friend and the "quote" bottom of the line Agnar lens turned out to be sharper than most mid-level Apotars that I've dealt with. Had the camera been for me, I'm sure that the lens would have been a dog.

Also, sharpness isn't alway the end all even in enlargement. I tend judge a lens by the contrast and tonality present in the final print.

Glen Peterson , Nov 11, 2004; 04:17 p.m.

Like lex my Jsolette has a agnar 85mm f4.5(but in a vario shutter), and is very sharp. One of the best ebay buys I've ever made. The largest prints that I ever make in the darkroom are only 8x10, but I have cropped a small section from a negative(printed at 8x10), and it looked great.

don mckeith , Nov 11, 2004; 06:57 p.m.

I often wonder why someone buys a 50yo camera and worries about sharpness

It's probably at least as sharp as my 1924 Kodak #1, with a RR lens, and I really like those pics, and I'm sure it's as sharp as my Target Brownie Box camera and I'm doing a port. on box camera pics ,cause they're great-

shoot some film,see how you like it,don't worry about sharpness,it's overrated

Joris Van Looveren , Nov 12, 2004; 04:02 a.m.

I'm not worried, just wondering what I might get out of it.

Mark Sampson , Nov 12, 2004; 10:20 a.m.

When I was a child my dad's camera was an Agfa Isola with a 6.3 Agnar lens. After I inherited it I loaned it to a co-worker who used a Diana (they were the Holga of 20 years ago). She tried the Agfa but gave it back because the lens was "too sharp".


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses