A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Classic Manual Cameras > Two classic camera, one spiffy...

Featured Equipment Deals

A Brief History of Photography - Part I (Video Tutorial) Read More

A Brief History of Photography - Part I (Video Tutorial)

This video tutorial gives a succinct overview of the discovery and development of photography from the origins of the camera obscura through the Daguerrotype process. Next week's tutorial will cover...

Latest Equipment Articles

The Week in Photography News Read More

The Week in Photography News

November 15-21, 2014: Hear the latest goings-on in the photography world, from product releases to event and campaign announcements and more.

Latest Learning Articles

Introduction to Creating an Album in Lightroom - Part I (Video Tutorial) Read More

Introduction to Creating an Album in Lightroom - Part I (Video Tutorial)

Learn to create an album in the Book Tab of Lightroom that you can publish and present to clients.


Two classic camera, one spiffy newer lens

Dan Fromm , Jul 23, 2005; 02:28 p.m.

At the rear, 2x3 Pacemaker Speed Graphic. In front, Century Graphic. 480/9 Apo Nikkor front-mounted on a Copal #1, focused on infinity. The tubes aren't strictly necessary but don't hurt and make setting up easier.

The thing works!

Cheers,

Responses


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Glenn Thoreson , Jul 23, 2005; 02:49 p.m.

Cool, Dan! Is this the film pack adapter idea to connect them? Looks like it worked out well.

CE Nelson , Jul 23, 2005; 03:33 p.m.

Behold, Frankenstein!

Vivek . , Jul 23, 2005; 04:34 p.m.

Dan, Congratulations! So, you finally got it done! How much did the adaptor/rigs cost?

Sandeha Lynch , Jul 23, 2005; 04:49 p.m.

Didn't Captain Marvel carry one of those during the Kree-Skrull Wars?

Dan Fromm , Jul 23, 2005; 05:38 p.m.

Glen, yes of course there's an FPA in there. And here's a picture of the bracketry.

Vivek, if you have to ask how much it cost, you can't afford it. SKGrimes does nice work, but aren't cheap. They charge on a time and materials basis. I supplied most of the material, but setting up to put the holes in the t-slotted extrusion and molding in exactly the right places cost. Setting up to make the tubes -- lensboard to FPA, and an invisible one inside the FPA for light shielding and neatness -- was similarly time-consuming. It didn't help that they modified my original design, which called for the tube to be glued to the FPA, to allow it to slide in.

Sandeha, of course I stole the idea. But not from fiction, from a hint in A. A. Blaker's lovely book Field Photography.

Cheers,

Large photo attachment:
(bracketry -- 1536 x 2048 photo)

Dan Fromm , Jul 23, 2005; 05:40 p.m.

CE, this is by no stretch of the imagination a monster camera. I mean, it shoots only 2x3. Real monsters shoot bigger than 16x20.

Cheers,

RJ . , Jul 23, 2005; 06:38 p.m.

Dan, I've only just managed to get a Schneider Super Angulon 47mm f5.6 lens onto a Century Graflex - after 1 year.

480mm focal length....is a real achievement.

I'm speechless.

PS. does anything support the weight of the front lens element?

Mike Kovacs , Jul 23, 2005; 06:41 p.m.

Dan, do you have some sort of special use in mind for this medium format super long rig? I almost said telephoto but I don't know if you lens is telephoto, probably not if you went through all this!

Vivek . , Jul 23, 2005; 06:56 p.m.

If Dan's APO Nikkor 480/9 is the later design (4/4 construction) then it would weigh 859g.

My sample (same optics with the same physical dimensions), is a bit lighter at 775g.

These APO Nikkors have quite a few extras (decorative rings as Nikon calls) which do not serve any functions other than the appearance. They can be unscrewed and left out.

Dan, you would need a good shade for your monster.


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses