A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Classic Manual Cameras > Kodak bantam camera

Featured Equipment Deals

Capturing the Heart of Home Read More

Capturing the Heart of Home

With cool days ahead, join "everyday photographer" Tracey Clark as we glance around the home for indoor photo opportunities and inspiration. From daily routines to holiday celebrations, Tracey gives...

Latest Equipment Articles

2015 Mother's Day Gift Guide Read More

2015 Mother's Day Gift Guide

If your mom is always there for you, with camera in hand, then this is the gift guide for her! This list of top photo gear picks will help you make mom's day.

Latest Learning Articles

Processing Capabilities with RAW (Video Tutorial) Read More

Processing Capabilities with RAW (Video Tutorial)

In this week's video tutorial you will learn about the various benefits of processing your RAW files in an editing program. Paired with the advantages of shooting in manual mode, this important step...


Kodak bantam camera

Eddy d , May 31, 2009; 05:46 p.m.

Hey Everyone. I came across a Kodak bantam camera with a doublet lense. It says it takes panatomic f-828 film. I doubt i could still get film for it and is it worth anything? Any information will be helpful. Thank you.

Responses


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Patrick Mont , May 31, 2009; 06:00 p.m.

You can certainly still get film for it! http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/200779-REG/Kodak__Portra_160NC_828_Professional_Color.html I can't help you with the value, but I would shoot some film and have a good time with it! Good Luck!

Carol Christopher , May 31, 2009; 06:31 p.m.

The Bantam was my first camera, over 50 years ago. Today I have that one, plus one more I bought on ebay. They are not worth much, mostly because the film, while available, is harder to get and have processed. Plus 8 exposures doesn't go far these days.

That said, there is no reason why you couldn't order a few rolls, shoot them and then get them processed.

There is a more valuable model, the Kodak Bantam Special, which was really a totally different camera. It commands higher prices, due to it's rarity and "art deco" design by Walter Teague in 1936.

Eddy d , May 31, 2009; 07:13 p.m.

Thank you for the information. Who develops the film for the camera. I also forgot to mention I also found Sylvania flash bulbs blue dot AG1.

Robert Gussin , May 31, 2009; 08:17 p.m.

I LOVE THIS CAMERA!!! I had an early one, but the bellows fell apart. I bought a Flash Bantam and have had a ton of fun! Eddy, if you google the camera and 828 film you'll get som ideas, but here's what I do.
I have collected a few 828 spools. 828 film is simply 35mm film with one perferation hole what would be the equivalent of every 9 holes on regular 135 (35mm) film. The first few times with my Bantam I covered the plastic porthole in the back with heavy tape to block the light. Using an changing bag, I rewound some regular kodak 35mm color film onto a spool (about 22 photos worth, the spools are smaller than regular 135). I loaded the camera in a changing bag. Shot the film having to press the perf release button 9 times per shot. Then again into the changing bag to transfer the exposed film into the 35mm film cartridge I took it from. THen I took it to Wal-Mart. They may or may not be able to print the full 9-perf wide photo, I have a film scanner, so I scan my own.
After a while I cut down some 120 film backing paper and put numbers on the back to show up in the porthole. Then I can just hold the perf release button in and eyeball the frame numbers in the porthole.
I also can develope my own b/w and have cut down 120 film to avoid the perf holes altogether. Here's alink to some b/w (notice the scratch marks on the Caddy shot.)
You can do it, Eddy! And Photo.net can help, it and the incredible Photo.net community helped me!
Examples: http://www.pbase.com/bgussin/old_tractorsold_camera
-Bob

-Bob


My stepdaughter and her Yashica taken with my older Bantam.

Janne Moren , May 31, 2009; 09:06 p.m.

I wonder what "panatomic" meant, by the way? The film was made from all kinds of atoms?

Eddy d , May 31, 2009; 09:14 p.m.

Hey Bob. GReat shot. Amazing from a little camera and the pretty model helps too.

Rob Holz , May 31, 2009; 09:23 p.m.

...and she has such nice taste in cameras too. :-)

JDM von Weinberg , May 31, 2009; 10:07 p.m.

Re Panatomic-X

Janne, I tried to see if I could find something at Camerapedia, etc. , but no soap.

This is a guess, but surely "pan" means the film is panchromatic.

I'm guessing that the "atomic" part reflects its extremely fine (small like an atom) grain. There was also prewar fascination with "atomic" power etc in sci-fi of the time. Something that would sound all futuristic? I think Panatomic was first made in the 1930s and made it into the late 80s or so.

Jack Welsh , May 31, 2009; 10:25 p.m.

Have the Bantam RF camera. The slide mounts from Gepe, are also available.


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses