Greg Blanston , Feb 03, 2012; 11:22 a.m.
I was researching some of my surplus film equipment before listing it and discovered that my f2 is really early production. The serial number is 7100075. I was considering it as a "user" (it always was for me) but I wonder if the low number makes it more a collector. It has a DP-2 on it but I don't remember changing the finder and I think I am the original owner. Is that possible?
Is this camera "special" or is it just going to be yet another fantastic vintage film camera hitting the market?
I appreciate any comment.
THANKS!
Tom Cheshire , Feb 03, 2012; 11:38 a.m.
Ok, the 71 may mean an early production but look at all the zeros. It is camera #75 for that year's production run. A serial number like that I could hype up to $600. at a certain auction site. By the way, the F2 supposedly was introduced in 1972.
John Narsuitus , Feb 03, 2012; 12:08 p.m.
John Narsuitus , Feb 03, 2012; 12:09 p.m.
Nikon F2
Lilly W , Feb 03, 2012; 12:52 p.m.
The F2 hit the market in the fall of 1971. Serial numbers began with ‘71’, thus your body appears to be the 75th off the line, excepting prototypes, pre-release editions, etc. The DP-2 viewfinder (making for F2S) was introduced in ’73 so it is not original to that body. Could you command a premium for the early body? Probably, yet any savvy collector (vs. armchair collector) would immediately realize the mismatch between body and prism and, therefore, discount the value significantly. Furthermore, in the case of representing an F2 as a very early body even with the proper DP-1 prism, a savvy collector would want to ascertain a proper match by confirming the serial numbers of both body and prism. There's an abundance of mismatched bodies and prisms on the market that are misrepresented as 'original', e.g. early or mid-production bodies with DP-12 finders (F2AS) or late bodies with early finders. But for the average user this doesn’t matter and goes unnoticed
Many sources, including Nikon Corporation, cite the release date of the F2 Photomic (DP-1 metering prism) as 1971.
paul wheatland , Feb 03, 2012; 01:03 p.m.
As a note of interest, early Nikon F-2 only with motor drive in use, had a "ghosting" problem(film moved ever so slightly in the gate) which may have resulted in a recall and or adjustment to the mechanism to correct this fault.
Greg Blanston , Feb 03, 2012; 02:02 p.m.
Thanks for the input. I'm not too
concerned about value. I just don't
want a camera with historical
significance to disappear into an old
camera pile somewhere. Its not in
super condition but it's a good user ( I
loaned it to my niece for her high
school photo class). If the DP-2 makes
it a non-collector I'll probably just
craigslist it.
Robert Hooper
, Feb 03, 2012; 02:05 p.m.
Contact Sover Wong. He is perhaps the worlds foremost authority on the Nikon F2. He may even be interested in buying your F2.
JDM von Weinberg 
, Feb 03, 2012; 02:21 p.m.
Fred C , Feb 03, 2012; 03:53 p.m.
Ignorant question: would a viewfinder that originally came with the body have the same serial number as the body?