A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Featured Equipment Deals

8 Reasons Why You Should Subscribe to Photo.net Read More

8 Reasons Why You Should Subscribe to Photo.net

Photo.net loves all of the members who make our site and community what it is, but we love our subscribing members just a little bit more. We rely on our subscribers to help us with things such as...

Latest Equipment Articles

Choosing a Mobile Photo Printer Read More

Choosing a Mobile Photo Printer

In today's mobile, digital world, we carry hundreds or even thousands of pictures around on our smartphones and tablets. Tom Persinger looks at 4 different mobile photo printer options for getting...

Latest Learning Articles

Advanced Printing with Lightroom (Video Tutorial) Read More

Advanced Printing with Lightroom (Video Tutorial)

Building upon last week's Basic Printing with Lightroom video tutorial, this advanced printing tutorial will teach you to print contact sheets, print multiple images at a time, use Lightroom's present...


Kodak Pony 135

Responses


First     Prev     1   |   2   |   3   |   4     Next    Last

Andy Collins , May 10, 2012; 08:17 p.m.

Very nice, Mike. I've had a couple of Pony cameras but sold both of them. Your pictures are very sharp and look surprisingly good with great image quality. Now I wish I hadn't sold both of them.

Marc Bergman , May 10, 2012; 09:33 p.m.

Here is the first ad I could find for the Pony 135. It was in the March 1951 issue of Modern Photography.

Marc Bergman , May 10, 2012; 09:35 p.m.

Here is the cover of the 1951 Wards Photographic catalog.

Marc Bergman , May 10, 2012; 09:38 p.m.

Here is the first part of the catalog pages showing the Pony cameras and their competitors.

Marc Bergman , May 10, 2012; 09:40 p.m.

Here is part 2.

Rod Larson , May 11, 2012; 12:19 a.m.

You picked a great subject to try out your Pony on, Mike. Great photos. I have passed up
a couple of Pony 135's lately and I don't know why. They look like and interesting camera.
You have inspired me to quit passing them up.

About a year ago a friend gave me a Pony 828. Below is a photo of it.


Kodak Pony 828

Mike Gammill , May 11, 2012; 02:17 p.m.

Rick- thanks for the link and the compliments.
Louis, thanks for the info on the lens and the compliments. I knew some lenses had radioative glasses (like lanthanum, for example), but never knew the budget priced (but capable) Pony series had such glass.
Marc- thanks for the compliments and the ad/catalog scans. Wards, like Sears, had a wide selectrion of photo equipment in its day.
Rod- thanks for the compliments. Great shot of your Pony 828 outfit. You can slit 120 film down to reuse that 828 spool. Or if you don't mind spockets intruding a bit into the image you can just use 35mm. Be sure to save the paper backing from the orginal 828 roll.
John, Charles, JDM, Jack, and Andy- thanks for the compliments.
I've gained a new respect for this little camera. I must confess that I "conveniently" forgot that I had it for a while before deciding to try it out.
Thanks again.

Louis Meluso , May 11, 2012; 09:43 p.m.

Sorry Mike, my mistake. I looked it up and it appears only the Kodak Pony IV with the 44mm f/3.5 Anastar had the Thorium radioactive high index lens. It was a rigid lens, too.
http://camerapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Kodak_Pony_828/135

Mike Gammill , May 12, 2012; 06:19 p.m.

Thanks, Louis. I haven't had access to a Geiger counter since I retired from public school teaching so I had no way to confirm it anyway. ;-) I do have a 50mm f1.4 Takumar that I'm curious about, though.

ian campbell , May 16, 2012; 04:18 p.m.

Big Creek doesn't look very...big


First     Prev     1   |   2   |   3   |   4     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses