A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Mirrorless Digital Cameras > Canon > "Fast lens" What is the exact...

Featured Equipment Deals

Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM A Review Read More

Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM A Review

Pro family photographer, Stacy Bostrom, reviews the Sigma 50mm f/1.4. See how this lens stacks up against her tried-and-true favorite.

Latest Equipment Articles

The Week in Photography News Read More

The Week in Photography News

November 15-21, 2014: Hear the latest goings-on in the photography world, from product releases to event and campaign announcements and more.

Latest Learning Articles

Introduction to Creating an Album in Lightroom - Part I (Video Tutorial) Read More

Introduction to Creating an Album in Lightroom - Part I (Video Tutorial)

Learn to create an album in the Book Tab of Lightroom that you can publish and present to clients.


"Fast lens" What is the exact definition?

Matt White , May 18, 2007; 01:35 p.m.

I've seen the word usage "fast lens" many times when referring to aperture. Is this word usage due to the lens having a larger aperture opening therefor making it possible to use a faster shutter speed to capture the same image (light) it would take with a lens with a smaller aperture?

Responses


    1   |   2   |   3   |   4     Next    Last

Evan Goulet , May 18, 2007; 01:38 p.m.

Essentially, yes.

Matt Laur , May 18, 2007; 01:39 p.m.

Right! If it can get wider (open), you can shoot faster, everything else being the same. Also, money tends to leave your wallet faster when you buy such lenses.

Todd Peach , May 18, 2007; 01:48 p.m.

'fast' is also relative. Most folks think f/2.8 is fast in a zoom lens. Prime shooters think f/2.8 is slow, f/1.4 is fast.

F Stop , May 18, 2007; 01:49 p.m.

Having a "fast lens" is 10X more convenient when you're in the field, because you always seem to need that extra stop or two.

-my 2 cents

Matt White , May 18, 2007; 02:08 p.m.

Is there are reason why a 'fast lens' costs more? Is the cost of construction that much more?

Gerry Siegel (Honolulu) , May 18, 2007; 02:15 p.m.

One nitpic.Just to be more optically precise, I suggest a change in wording is better in this definition. I would not say "aperture" and stick to "f stop," as in f1.4 etc. (Aperture in relationship to focal length.) Regards,GS.

Matt Laur , May 18, 2007; 02:16 p.m.

Essentally, to keep the light consistently focused through a larger aperture, you need more (and better) glass. That means more time consuming manufacturing, quality control, and physically larger parts. If it's an autofocus lens, there are larger parts being moved, so the autofocus mechanics need to be better. The demand for faster lenses also tends to come from more professional/serious shooters, which means they're also usually looking for more robust all-around construction (more metal, less plastic, more nimble A/F, etc). It all adds up. And of course, the golden rule: if there's less demand for it, there is less of a supply built... and that means you lose some economies of scale. Nikon probably ships hundreds of 50mm f/1.8 lenses for every single f/1.4 they sell.

Matt White , May 18, 2007; 02:21 p.m.

Ok, that all makes sense. Thank you for explaining things Matt.

Gerry - Can you explain why my wording is incorrect? From what I understand, a lens rated at F1.4 has a larger aperture than a lens rated at F2.8, correct?

Evan Goulet , May 18, 2007; 02:45 p.m.

Well f/1.4 does not refer to the actual aperture. It is a way of standardizing the relationship of aperture to focal length. An f-stop of f/1.4 uses a larger diameter aperture on a 50 mm lens than on a 28 mm lens.

F-stop # is given as N = f / D, where f = focal length of the lens, and D = diameter of aperture.


    1   |   2   |   3   |   4     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses