Which Mirrorless do you have and/or want?

The only mirrorless (working) cameras I currently have is a Panasonic P&S and cellphones... And I'm OK with the size, slapping mirror and weight of my DSLR, so I am not utterly pushed to get into mirrorless with interchangeable lenses. I'm following developments, but at the moment more as a gadget freak than somebody who is ready to pull the wallet out and get something.
But since you invite thoughts, here are my considerations.

The Fuji X-Pro 1 really is the most interesting to me (*), if it wasn't for the price - as is the X100. I like it Fuji chose to launch the X1 with primes. If I get a camera like this, I'm not going to be tempted by a slow kitzoom, I'm looking for a system that could give me ~35/50/85mm small(ish) fast(ish) primes. Hopefully the next X model will be more affordable - then I might actually consider it. The NX200 with its affordable and small primes is also interesting, to me. Here in Europe, the lenses really are a relative bargain.
I considered the Olympus E-PM1 some time ago, when it was on offer here for a really good price. What put me off was the interface - too much a P&S, at which moment I decided I could just as well do with the P&S (which is lighter, smaller and less expensive to replace), since adding the wanted primes was going to add quite some cost, and still leave me with a user interface that doesn't look too great to me.

Somehow I think that Nikon may have got quite some things incredibly right with the Nikon 1's. When it launched, the sites and forums were all lamenting how the sensor wasn't larger.... but at least, the system is small, and a large portion of the market does not care about sensor size. And more important, it's fast, and I honestly believe that counts for many people. Most people I know grow tired of P&S because they're slow - slow to AF, slow to take a picture, slow with continuous shots. It's not aimed at most people here (experienced photographers, most used to rather direct interfaces), but well, us here, we're a niche market. The 1 system doesn't seem perfect, but it does fix some real-world issues. For other people. It's not for me.

My next camera.... will probably be a newer DSLR body. Unless the P&S breaks first.

______
(*) Does the Leica M9 count as a mirrorless? In that case, that's the most desirable - easy to state since my budget is nowhere near Leica money.

Just haven't seen one yet that's talking to me, Leslie (enough to buy one, and a suite of lenses and new compatible flash to go with it ...). But I can see that at some point there will be something that I'd gladly count as an emergency backup or really-traveling-light device, when a big light-gathering lens isn't appealing anyway. We'll see.

In the meantime, my primary mirrorless camera is made by Apple.

I have a Samsung NX100. I am considering either the Sony NEX 7 or Fuji X-Pro 1 (the best looking camera I've seen in years!). Basically, I'm standing pat to see how things shake out as I am not an early adopter type. Scuttlebutt has it that Samsung has a rangefinder-type camera in the pipeline as well.

Truth be told, for all it's ergonomic missteps, the NX100 is quite good and, IMHO, the best bang for the mirrorless buck right now. For relatively small $$$, it has a nice feature set- APS-C 14.6MP, a great OLED screen, easy-to-use interface, I-Control lenses and adaptability to my fleet of MF Canon FD, Nikkor, Pentax SMC M42 and Olympus lenses. Shooting RAW, the image quality is surprisingly good. My EOS 7D is better but not by much at far greater cost and weight. Even the Samsung kit 20-50mm zoom is impressively good. The thing slips into a jacket pocket, is as light as a feather and totally silent which you just got to love. A few rubber Gecko strips on the body helped tremendously with the handling of this slick little body.

This camera will hold me for a while till things shake out a bit more. I have to say it's the most fun I've had with a camera in years.

Well, I have the E-PM1 and have to say it's an absolutely brilliant camera. Although the controls are simplified as Wouter states, it isn't really an issue to me. In fact, I would consider it partially why I like it. It's uncluttered, easy to use, and does everything I need. When I'm using it, chances are I'm not carrying a meter, so I'm in either aperture priority or shutter priority. Just turn the wheel on the back to adjust the exposure, and I'm good to go. It's fast, compact, easy to use, and gives much better results than my LX3 did.

That said, if adding to the stable (it will be a long time before I replace the E-PM1), it will either be a new m43 (maybe that OM-D if rumors are true), or the Fuji+primes. But, I'm not sure any of those would serve me better than a dedicated DSLR (currently D7000). More than likely, the D700 or rumored D800 is in the future.

But yes, mirrorless I would choose are the OM-D, if rumors hold true, or the Fuji. The NEX just don't work for me.

Panasonic GX1, but I'm looking forward to seeing if the Olympus "OM-D" rumors are true.

The Fuji's are the most interesting to me right now and the ones I can't wait to get my hands on. If an EP3 with better handling came out, I'd be excited. The GXR, while a unique design, has been great for me. I like the pentax Q, but I don't know that I like it enough to buy one. Particularly with the limited lens lineup. The Sonys and Nikons I need more time with before I feel I could have a educated opinion.

I wouldn't mind picking up a second hand NEX when one comes down to my price league! Like the look of the Pen series but can't justify buying one.

I have one mirror by Canon and five mirrorless, Canon, Nikon, Panasonic in reverse order of purchase. But when I think of the true mirrorless instead of the coy connotations I have one. One which doesn't figure in your list ... shame on you Leslie.
Whatyer got against the G3? :-)
Matt ... I got an interesting snap recently ... a woman applying make-up using her freind's live view digital as a 'mirror' ...at least as a mere male I thought it fun :-)

I have a Panasonic G1 right now and I'll have to wait and see how the Olympus OM-D is before I would make my next purchase. With all the hacks happening on the GH2 I wouldn't mind picking one up just for some upgrade on the stills side but the videos I've seen from it make it a great combination. Now will Panasonic come up soon with a GH3 that would make it more interesting for me.