A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Digital Darkroom > Printing>Technique > matte vs. glossy for framing a...

Featured Equipment Deals

Tamron 14-150mm f/3.5-5.8 Di III Zoom Lens for Micro Four Thirds Review Read More

Tamron 14-150mm f/3.5-5.8 Di III Zoom Lens for Micro Four Thirds Review

Bob Atkins investigates Tamron's first foray into the micro four thirds world. The Tamron 14-150mm f/3.5-5.8 Di III lens is an "all-in-one" zoom that covers everything from wideangle to telephoto.

Latest Equipment Articles

Macro Lens Review: Tamron SP 90MM F/2.8 Di VC USD 1:1 Read More

Macro Lens Review: Tamron SP 90MM F/2.8 Di VC USD 1:1

Tamron's SP 90mm f2.8 Di VC Macro sees Tamron building on its earlier version of the 90mm (with the same name,) to make a macro lens that is more in step with its competition (Nikon AF-S VR...


matte vs. glossy for framing a print?

Jimmy E , Apr 03, 2006; 11:48 a.m.

Hi all,

I'm thinking of framing this B&W print below, 52" x 10", but am undecided whether to go with the glossy or matte finish. Any opinions?

http://www.zazzle.com/collections/products/product/product.asp? cid=238605897421233739&general_recs_per_page=9&paging_page=2&searchin g=on&searching_search_columns=% 2A&searching_search_condition=richmond% 2C+va&caching=on&product_id=228634809509458545&index=13

Thanks!

Responses

Jimmy E , Apr 03, 2006; 11:49 a.m.

http://www.zazzle.com/collections/products/product/product.asp?cid=238605897421233739&general_recs_per_page=9&paging_page=2&searching=on&searching_search_columns=%2A&searching_search_condition=richmond%2C+va&caching=on&product_id=228634809509458545&index=13

Slade Zumhofe , Apr 03, 2006; 12:24 p.m.

I couldn't get your links to work. I prefer glossy for the higher Dmax but I think behind glass it is tough to see the difference between the two.

Hope this helps.

Marshall Goff , Apr 03, 2006; 01:39 p.m.

Quite a link you've got there. Try http://tinyurl.com/l83cw instead.

I don't know if it makes a huge difference for that print. It depends on how they make it.

Michael Axel , Apr 03, 2006; 02:18 p.m.

I think glossy looks a little sharper, but it depends on what you're going for. If the print is more nostalgic, it may not matter so much.

Tom Purnell , Apr 03, 2006; 03:26 p.m.

Mentally, I equate glossy with snapshots and matte with a more professional quality.

Go with matte.

Slade Zumhofe , Apr 03, 2006; 03:31 p.m.

I think Ansel and Edward just turned over in their graves.

When I think of matte I think of senior portraits. Unless you did Plat./Pall. printing the majority of all great printers used glossy. It wasn't until people started using inkjets that were unable to produce archival prints on glossy paper. That has changed and many previous matte users are now going back to glossy/satin.

Robert Goldstein , Apr 03, 2006; 04:39 p.m.

Glossy prints are slightly more vibrant than matte, but behind glass, they produce more reflections. Under these circumstances, one may consider matte preferable.

Mike Earussi , Apr 03, 2006; 08:42 p.m.

Unless you plan on wearing cotton gloves when framing the print, I'd go with matt. Matt doesn't show cleaning scratches readily either.

Robert K , Apr 04, 2006; 04:45 p.m.

For color prints, I find luster/semi-gloss/gloss papers have wider color gamuts and finer shadow details than matte paper. Not sure how they compare in b/w prints.

For matting and framing Super B size prints (13"x19"), I prefer matte paper over the others. Free floating matte papers appear to be perfectly flat, while the other papers would have ripples when viewed at an angle. The only way to rid the ripples is to dry mount the prints. There is at least one product on the market for that purpose.

Back to top

Notify me of Responses