Frank Ellis , Jun 14, 2007; 11:11 a.m.
I'm confused.
You can do a colour balance with the midtone eyedropper in curves/levels by
selecting a neutral colour.
Some tutorials I've seen suggest using the shadow and highlight eyedroppers.
Other tutorials suggest using all 3 eyedroppers.
So I'm confused. What's the difference and which is a better choice for
adjusting white balance.
-Frankie
Ellis Vener
, Jun 14, 2007; 12:42 p.m.
a better choice is shooting raw and using the white balance eye dropper on a tone you know is a neutral shade 9meaning you knowthat there are equal or very close to equal amounts of Red , Green and Blue values in that gray tone.
Tim Lookingbill 
, Jun 14, 2007; 12:52 p.m.
It depends on the image. This tutorial will show a technique that
explains why white balance can be a tricky situation image by
image...
Bruce Fraser's White Balance through Auto Color
Scans may require one way while digicams require another due
to different lighting characteristics and how they influence
midtone colors derived from the varied color tables produced by
each capture device and scene.
For instance hot red looks oversaturated shot under warm
lighting, but when you try to neutralize this warm cast hot red
turns dull red because of an increase in the blue channel and
decrease in red. Blend modes like Color, Saturation or
Luminance can do a lot in controlling this.
There are so many ways to approach this. I shot a series of
flowers recently under the same digicam WB setting that turned
out a bit dark. I found a simple move of the highlite slider in
Levels to the left caused the vibrantly peach colored flower to
lose richness and turn a bit pinkish because the blue channel
gained in the mids for some reason.
To control this I sampled a white object whose WB RGB combo
was 230,220,200 in the Color Picker. Clicked on the Lab
Luminance radio button and increased this RGB combo as light
as it would go before it changed hue (around 250,240,210) and
established that as my highlite setting.
Exited Color Picker and clicked the highlite eyedropper on this
same whitish area which brightened the entire image without
affecting color and vibrancy of the flower. A regular Luminance
blend mode approach would add a blackish, kind of desaturated
tint to my results but not change the hue of the flower. The Bruce
Fraser Auto Color technique tutorial got me to thinking and
altering my approach to WB adjust in this manner.
Or maybe it just made me too picky about color correction. Not
sure.
Mendel Leisk 
, Jun 14, 2007; 03:12 p.m.
If you're working on dslr raws: Adobe Camera Raw has a dedicated "white balance" eye dropper. I found it quite effective coupled with having a grey card in one shot.
Hugh Sakols , Jun 14, 2007; 04:20 p.m.
I use a method taught to me by charlie cramer. I go into curves, click on white dropper, select a white point, look at L, a, b., I zero out the a and b values, next hit ok, then i go back and select the white point. If I don't get exactly what I want i change the opacity in that level. At the end it will ask if you want to save your settings. I always mark no.
For gray balance I just select a number of mid tones until I get close to what I want and then adjust opacity in that level.
Hugh Sakols , Jun 14, 2007; 04:22 p.m.
sorry when I said I change the opacity in that level, I meant layer. I always just work in curves.
Barry Fisher 
, Jun 14, 2007; 06:01 p.m.
I've been doing this, maybe its not best,but the results seem ok. Assuming its not a raw file, I take the file in CS2 use the color picker, make the info tab visible (default next to navigator, pick a neutral gray, often using the street or something and then balance the values so the rbg values at that selected point are the same, than I know that's a gray. I can then set levels to bring it up or down. I'm finding this often cures any color casts I may have out of camera. but I'm interseted in exploring the use of LAB that everyone talks about, maybe its better. This way seems pretty fast though.
Heller Harris , Jun 15, 2007; 07:33 a.m.
Hi - The Photoshop User/PhotoshopTV guys did a session on a method that requires no eyeballing/guesswork.
Step 1: You first set White and Black points with the threshold tool. To do this, open a Threshold Layer, which pulls up a histogram and turns the image into black and white (no grays). Push the slider all the way to the left and work up (right). The screen should be white. Mark the first visible (black) pixel. (Mark: Shift-Click with Eyedropper tool set at Point Sample.) That's your black point. Go all the way to the right and work down (left). The screen should be black. Mark the first visible (white) pixel. That's your white point. (NOTE: It's good to briefly uncheck the "Preview" option, just to make sure that you're not marking a piece of dust, etc.) Once you mark both points, discard/cancel the Threshold layer.
Step 2: Create a neutral/middle gray Solid Colour layer. Set the blend mode to "Difference". Open a new Threshold Layer. Push the slider all the way to the left and work up. Mark the first visible pixel - that should be middle gray. Cancel/discard the Threshold Layer. Discard the Solid Colour layer.
Step 3: Open a Curves Layer. Use the three eyedroppers to set the Black - White - Middle Gray points. Save this layer.
For most images, I skip the middle step; setting the white and black points is sufficient. If I'm worried about colour cast, then I do the middle step.
You can probably find better instructions and a full explanation at the Photoshop TV site.
Good luck.
Emil Ems , Jun 18, 2007; 09:51 a.m.
The method Heller described makes a lot of sense to me, when one is looking for locating the white, black and middle grey points.
What I would like to add is that there is a flaw in Photoshop's method for color correction via the middle eye dropper. Using that for color correction introduces new deviations from the original. To avoid this, one should use the highlight eyedropper, applying Heller's neutral grey layer to the middle grey point, if there is a color cast in the latter and it should actually be neutral grey.