A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Digital Darkroom > Scanning>Technique > how to do slide film on...

Featured Equipment Deals

Aging Photos Roundup Read More

Aging Photos Roundup

Learn Photoshop techniques on how to age your photos digitally in the Photoshop Darkroom. Includes example images and step-by-step instruction.

Latest Equipment Articles

Sun Position Tracking Apps Read More

Sun Position Tracking Apps

These 5 apps, ranging in price from free to $8.99, are our top picks for tracking sun (and moon) light. Also ranging in complexity, some help you keep tabs on the ideal lighting of the day while...

Latest Learning Articles

Basic Image Development in Lightroom: Color Editing (Video Tutorial) Read More

Basic Image Development in Lightroom: Color Editing (Video Tutorial)

Learn basic HSL (hue, saturation, and luminance) color adjustments as well as split toning (adjusting color in highlights and lowlights) in this next video.


how to do slide film on Perfection 4490?

H S , Apr 27, 2010; 11:41 a.m.

I have a roll of a Fujichrome Sensia 100 slide film ready to be processed. This will be my first slide film on my Perfection 4490 (have done only negative films till now). So, people who have experience in this: what should I opt for during processing: mounted or not?

I know that the film has to be as flat as possible for best scans and to avoid newton rings. I usually achieve this by leaving a newly processed film under a number of books for a couple of days. So curved film is not a problem anymore. However, mounted slides are easier to handle and view. If I get my slides mounted, would my scanning suffer in any way on Epson Perfection 4490 flatbed scanner?

Thanks.

Responses

Troy Ammons , Apr 27, 2010; 11:45 a.m.

I prefer not mounted.
The only reason to mount slide film is to show with a slide projector.

Starvy Goodfellows , Apr 27, 2010; 12:52 p.m.

Hello H
I use the same scanner and had scanned a lot of Kodak Elitechrome in the past. I used the holders despite the limited numbers it can hold. It is best to test out both ways to see what works best for you. Scanning is definitely a craft to be mastered. It is unlikely to get it right after just the first few frames. However, with patience, I personally feel that good quality slow film offers better quality than DSLR bodies. If you handle it correctly, there should not be any possibility of scratching.

Sensia scans better than Velvia but the best in the lot from Fuji is Astia. Do post some results.

Les Sarile , Apr 27, 2010; 06:17 p.m.

Obviously when mounted, you will loose some area of the film. This may not be important if you didn't frame the shot too tightly or if your viewfinder is not 100%.

peter carter , Apr 28, 2010; 10:29 p.m.

As far as the 4490 is concerned, the mounted slides are the only holder that works properly. You will get expected results.

I prefer not mounting the E6, but I wet mount.

H S , May 27, 2010; 09:03 p.m.

Some followup on this thread. I finished the slide film (Fujichrome Sensia 100) using Canon EOS 1N (50mm f1.8 lens), processed it and scanned it on Epson 4490 using Vuescan (I have no ICC profiles for this film and scanner though). Unfortunately, the scans do not appear to do justice to the slides.

Being a bit too confident, I did not have the slides scanned during processing, so I do not have a scanned reference. The slides themselves look okay (checked with a 50mm f1.8 lens as loupe, but I am no expert).

I have attached an example. The colors are not as bright or popped as are supposed to be in daylight, what I was expecting from a slide film. I have had much better colors in scanning a drug store negative film (Kodak Color Plus 200)!

There is also a strange horizontal streak along the frame. It is 216 pixels from top and is around 5 pixels wide. It appears that it may be due to the scanner since I wasn't able to make it out using my 'loupe' on the slide. It is not visible in every frame, but I did notice that it can be made go away when I change exposure or brightness in the scanned images. Any idea what it might be?

So, can somebody suggesting what could have gone wrong or what I need to check/rectify to get better scan results from this slide film?

Thanks.

H S , May 28, 2010; 10:34 a.m.

NOTE: I started a new thread on this topic here: http://photo.net/digital-darkroom-forum/00WYYx. Please post all further replies and discussion to the new place. Thanks!

Back to top

Notify me of Responses