Welcome to Photo.net: A Community of Photographers

Home > Equipment > DSLRs on a Budget

5 Entry Level DSLR Camera Kits

Camera Kits under $800 by Bob Atkins

In this article I’m going to take a look at an entry level DSLR from each of the 5 main players in the DSLR field: Canon, Nikon, Olympus, Pentax and Sony. In each case, it’s possible to purchase the camera body, a wide angle zoom and a telephoto zoom for well under $900, in fact you can probably get all of them for under $800 if you shop carefully. The five DSLRs I’ve selected are the Canon EOS Digital Rebel XSi, the Nikon D60, the Olympus E-520, the Pentax K200D and the Sony Alpha A350.

For more advice on choosing a camera, take a look at my article on Factors to Consider when Choosing a Digital SLR Camera.

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XSi (EOS 450D)

The Canon EOS Digital Rebel XSi falls between the cheaper and less fully featured Digital Rebel XS and XTi and the more expensive EOS 40D. It’s Canon’s best “entry level” DSLR with many of the features of the more expensive EOS 40D/50D such as Highlight Tone Priority, Auto Lighting Optimization, a 14-bit A/D converter, a spot meter, Live View with live focus. 9 AF zones and a full set of auto, semi-auto and manual exposure modes. The sensor is a 12MP CMOS unit with dust removal, and it has a higher pixel count than the 10MP EOS 40D. Image quality is excellent and the camera operational speed is fast. It’s capable of shooting over 50 full quality JPEGs at 3 fps. Though it has the second highest pixel count of the group, high ISO noise is still well controlled.

Canon offers two low-cost Image Stabilized lenses to suit the Rebel XSi. The XSi can be purchased as a Canon Digital Rebel XSi (black), 18-55mm kit, $585 (review), and the Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS, $255 (review), can be added. There’s currently a $100 “instant rebate” if the EF-S 55-250 is purchased at the same time as an XSi body or kit.


Nikon D60

The Nikon D60 falls between the less expensive D40 and the more expensive D90. It adds a number of features over those found in the D40, such as a 10MP sensor (the D40 is 6MP), active D-Lighting, an ISO 100 setting, and a faster continuous shooting rate. The D60 features active dust reduction which includes an image sensor cleaning system with airflow control. With a reasonably fast memory card, the D60 can continuously capture high quality JPEGs at 2.6 fps without filling the image buffer and slowing down. The number of images is limited only by the card capacity. Limitations of the D60 include the fact that non-AF-S/AF-I lenses are manual focus only since there is no focusing motor in the D60 body. There are also only 3 AF zones, which is a smaller number than most of the competition (though for many users, 3 will be enough). The D60 does not have any Live View capability.

The Nikon D60 is available in two kits: Nikon D60, 18-55mm VR kit, and the Nikon D60, 18-55mm VR and 55-200mm kit. A stabilized version of the 55-200 is also available separately: Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED IF AF-S DX VR, $225.


Olympus E-520

The Olympus E-520 uses a Four Thirds format sensor, which means that the aspect ratio is 4:3 (rather than the more usual 3:2 of other DSLRs) and the sensor is physically smaller, resulting in a “digital focal length multiplier” of 2x rather than the 1.5x/1.6x of APS-C crop sensor DSLRs. The smaller sensor does allow the E-520 to be the lightest camera in this group, though it’s only about 1oz lighter than the next heavier camera. The E-520 is small, but not really any smaller than several of the other cameras described here. One very nice feature of the Olympus E-520 is that the camera body has image stabilization built in. The sensor moves to compensate for camera shake. This means that you don’t need to use lenses with built-in optical stabilization. Any lens you mount on the E-520 becomes part of an image stabilized system.

The E-520 is available with a kit lens Olympus Evolt E-520, 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 kit, $449 (review), and a telephoto zoom can be purchased separately Olympus 40-150mm f/3.5-4.5 ED, $139.


Pentax K200D

The Pentax K200D is unique in this group in that it’s the only camera of the five that offers full weather sealing. However, this isn’t quite as useful as it might be since none of the inexpensive Pentax lenses is weather sealed. Only 6 of their more expensive DA Star lenses match the weather sealing of the K200D body. Like the Olympus E-520, the Pentax K200D has image stabilization built into the camera body via a sensor shift system. Again this means that any lens mounted on the K200D becomes part of an image stabilized system. One rather disappointing aspect of the K200D is the small buffer size, good for only 4 JPEG images at 2.5 fps. Like the Nikon D60, the K200D also lacks any Live View capability.

The K200D can be purchased as a kit Pentax K200D, 18-55mm kit, and an inexpensive telephoto zoom is also available Pentax DA 50-200mm f/4-5.6 ED, $250 (review).


Sony Alpha A350

The Sony Alpha A350 has the highest pixel count of the 5 cameras described here at 14MP, almost as many as the new 15MP Canon EOS 50D. It’s also the only camera which has an LCD which can swing out and tilt, a very useful feature when shooting in Live View mode. In addition to that, the A350 also has image stabilization in the camera body via sensor shift, meaning you don’t have to use stabilized lenses. Of all the cameras in this group, the A350 probably has the best Live View interface, so if you like to shoot that way, bear that in mind. On the other hand for conventional use, the A350 has the smallest viewfinder screen of any of the 5 cameras described here. A downside of having the highest pixel count in this group is the fact that the A350 also probably has the highest noise levels once the ISO setting goes above 400. The larger file size is also probably a contributing factor to somewhat slower than average operation of the A350.

The A350 can be purchased as a kit Sony Alpha A350, 18-70mm kit (review) and an inexpensive telephoto zoom is also available Sony 55-200/4-5.6, $229


Which Camera is Best?

That’s always the most difficult question to answer. Basically, all these cameras are much better than any P&S digicam and below ISO 400 they all yield pretty good, low noise images. If you were to ask my own personal biased view, I’d say that the Canon EOS Digital Rebel XSi probably has the best overall features and performance, but I wouldn’t rule out any of the others, most of which have at least one feature that the XSi lacks.

The Pentax K200D, Olympus E-520 and Sony A350 all have image stabilization built into the body. If you’re just going to buy and use the kit lenses, this isn’t a big deal since the Canon and Nikon kit lenses have image stabilization built in. However, if you want to use a fast normal prime lens on these cameras for example, then you can’t get image stabilization with either the Canon Digital Rebel XSi or the Nikon D60.

The tilt and swivel LCD of the Sony A350 might be an important factor for anyone who intends to use Live View a lot. I don’t, so it’s not important for me, but it might be for you. The full weatherproofing of the Pentax K200D could be an important factor for anyone who shoots outdoors in bad weather (nature and sports photographers for example), though remember that the kit lenses aren’t weather sealed, so you’d need a more expensive lens for a fully sealed system.


Brief Specifications of the Canon Digital Rebel XSi, Nikon D60, Olympus E-520, Pentax K200D and Sony A350

Canon Digital Rebel XSi – EOS 450D Nikon D60 Olympus E-520 Pentax K200D Sony Alpha A350
Pixels 12.2MP 10.2MP 10.0MP 10.2MP 14.2MP
Sensor size 22.2×14.8 mm (3:2) 23.6×15.8 mm (3:2) 18.00×13.50 mm (4:3) 23.5×15.7 mm (3:2) 23.6×15.8 mm (3:2)
Lens Mount Canon EOS EF, EF-S mount Nikon F (AF only with motor in lens) 4/3 System Pentax KAF2 Sony Alpha
Lens Multiplier 1.6x 1.5x 2x 1.5x 1.5x
Sensor type CMOS CCD NMOS CCD CCD
ISO Settings Auto, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600 Auto, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, (3200 with boost) Auto, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600 Auto, 100 – 1600 in 1EV, 1/2EV or 1/3EV stops Auto, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200
Auto Focus 9 point 3 point 3 point (phase), 11 point (contrast) 11 point 9 point
Image stabilization None (available with IS lens) None (available with VR lens) In Body – Sensor shift In Body – Sensor shift In Body – Sensor shift
Flash GN
(ISO 100)
13 m 12 m 12 m 13 m 12 m
Continuous Drive 3.5 fps 3.0 fps 3.5 fps 2.8 fps 2.5 fps
JPEG (highest quality)
Buffer Size (est.)
53 Unlimited 20 4 Unlimited
Remote control IR or wired wired IR or wired IR or wired IR or wired
Memory Card SD/SDHC SD/SDHC CompactFlash, xD SD/SDHC CompactFlash
Viewfinder Pentamirror, 95% linear coverage, 0.87x Pentamirror, 95% linear coverage, 0.8x Pentamirror, 95% linear coverage, 0.92x Pentamirror, 96% linear coverage, 0.85x Pentamirror, 95% linear coverage, 0.74x
LCD 3" 2.5" 2.7" 2.7" 2.7" (tilt, swivel)
Live View Yes No Yes No Yes
Weather Sealing No No No Yes No
Battery Lithium-Ion
(LP-E5)
Lithium-Ion
(EN-EL9)
Lithium-Ion
(BLM-1)
4 x AA
(NiMH recommended)
Lithium Ion
(NP-FM500H)
Weight (with batteries) 524 g (18.5 oz) 522 g (18.4 oz) 490 g (17.3 oz) 690 g (24.3 oz) 632 g (22.3 oz)
Size 129×98 x 62 mm
5.1" x 3.9" x 2.4"
126×94 x 64 mm
5" x 3.7" x 2.5"
136×92 x 68 mm
5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7"
134×95 x 74 mm
5.4" x 3.7" x 2.9"
131×99 x 75 mm
5.2" x 3.9" x 3"

More


Original text ©2008 Bob Atkins.

Article created December 2008

Readers' Comments


Add a comment



Dan Lenski , December 18, 2008; 01:39 P.M.

Here's where in-body stabilization becomes a big advantage: CHEAP TELEPHOTO ZOOMS!

With Canon or Nikon, if you buy a $150 telephoto zoom like the Tamron 70-300 LD Macro, then you don't have stabilization. This makes it really tough to take handheld telephoto shots except in the very brightest light. With Sony or Olympus or Pentax (my favorite!), those inexpensive zoom lenses are now stabilized. And that model is quite decent optically too, a real bargain!!

To get stabilized telephoto lenses for Canon or Nikon, you have to pay a couple hundred dollar premium.

Justin Berk , December 27, 2008; 12:07 P.M.

"Limitations of the D60 include the fact that non-AF-S/AF-I lenses are manual focus only since there is no focusing motor in the D60 body."

Does this imply that my old 35mm 50mm f/1.8 and 20mm lenses I used back with the N70 would not autofocus on the D60 body? I fooled around with a D60 body recently and found this to be the case (no autofocus) but found few other posts suggesting that older AF lenses only worked in manual focus on the DSLR. Do other Nikon's DSLRs support AF for older lenses?

Johannes Bohnacker , December 27, 2008; 04:54 P.M.

For serious photography, features like mirror lockup and DOF preview might be of interest even in entry level DSLRs. Therefore I think they should have been included in the comparison table.

Orlando Andico , December 28, 2008; 02:29 P.M.

All Nikon DSLR's except the D40, D40X, and D60 have an in-body motor and thus can use old Nikon AF lenses in AF mode.

However, only the D2, D3, D200, D300, and D700 have the meter coupling lug so that you can meter with old Nikon (MF) lenses. The more "amateur class" bodies (D40, D40X, D60, D90) cannot meter at all with MF lenses.

Charlie Henss , December 30, 2008; 04:22 P.M.

The table lists the lens mount for the Sony as "Sony Alpha." It would be more correct to list it as "Minolta Maxxum/Dynax" or "Minolta A/F."

That's right, folks, the Sony can use every Minolta autofocus lens made since the Maxxum/Dynax was introduced in 1985. Most Minolta mount aftermarket lenses are also compatible, although not all Sigma-made lenses will work (visit www.dyxum.com for details)

Duane Mills , December 30, 2008; 08:10 P.M.

Good call Charlie. I also see a similar error on the Pentax K200D listing. It merely states the KAF2 mount while all K-mount lenses will work with some limitations. Heck even those superb old M42 screw mount Takumar, Super-Takumar and SMC Takumar lenses will work with an inexpensive screw mount adapter on the Pentax.

Milan Ilnyckyj , January 05, 2009; 04:07 P.M.

I think the Rebel XS is worth considering, as well.

The extra two megapixels the XSi have aren't overly important, except maybe for people making huge prints. While the ability to spot meter is useful, the extra AF points and larger viewfinder may not be huge advantages for many people. The XS is also smaller and lighter.

In short, people who see a significantly better price on the XS than the XSi should give the latter a serious look.

Karl Brody , January 09, 2009; 03:39 A.M.

If its sharper at large print wouldnt it be sharper at smaller print? The canon xsi looked fairly impressive compared to some cameras costing twice the price. My choice for this pricerange. Too bad it doesnt have a scroll wheel.

David B , January 20, 2009; 07:03 P.M.

As a purely film buff turned Digy 12 months ago I tested the range. I have owned and used Olympus, Nikon and Pentax out of these 5 manufacturers (Film Cameras). I suggest forget about the names, the badges and the hype!! Look at what you get, ease of use and quality. I tested them all using friends cameras. Based on everything I found and an expert analysis of experienced colleague photograpers evaluation of my results there was only one outcome: The Olympus 510 or 520 (don't pay the extra cause they perform the same) come out tops in quality and useability. However if you want to have the 'Nikon' badge thats a matter of personal self esteem!. Cheers David.

Lorraine Parramore , January 21, 2009; 04:43 P.M.

A year ago I looked at all the entry level DSLR's as an upgrade from a Canon Powershot S1 IS, and have had no regrets in buying the Olympus E510. Having found an image stabiliser invaluable in the Canon, the extra expense of the Canon and Nikon IS lenses left me checking out the other three. A camera that produces quality shots at an affordable price was a priority, so with good reviews, lots of features, two purpose made lenses, 14-48mm and 40 -150mm, the E510 is great value for money. I'll still aspire to Canon pro cameras, but the Olympus is absolutely fine for my photographic needs at the moment.

Emmanuel Huybrechts , February 24, 2009; 11:23 A.M.

There is an error about the K200D in the text. It's 2.8fps not 2.5. Also the buffer is for 4 Jpegs or RAWs but in practice with a fast card you can get a little more.

I would also disagree that the weathersealing is not useful because the kit lens is not. The body is much more important to protect than the lens. I've been shooting with a K10D (same weathersealing) with an unprotected lens under rain and snow and never got any problems. I wouldn't try that with any of the other competing cameras in this round-up.

Another interesting feature of the K200D is that it uses AA batteries (the only current DSLR with the Pentax K-m). Being much cheaper, and much more available it makes the K200D a very good travel camera. If you ever forgot your charger at home, you know what I mean.

Eric Seavey , March 21, 2009; 10:20 A.M.

I know someone who bought a Pentax K100D Super at the time when I had a Canon Rebel XTi. She also purchased the Tamron 18-250mm with that. I was so impressed with the ergonomics, large viewfinder, image stabilizer, and other features on that simple camera, that I switched over to Pentax. I bought the Pentax K10D and sold all may Canon equipment on ebay. For entry level, The current Pentax DLSRs are really nice, and the backward lens compatibility is a great plus! I found the Nikons to be very similar to the Canons, unfortunately I have too little experience with Olympus and Sony to form an opinion.

James Naka , May 13, 2009; 05:29 A.M.

Nice Entry Level DSLR Camera Kits Review . But I guess It still out of reach in terms of price for me.

Joe Eder , May 23, 2009; 06:42 P.M.

What is the least priced Nikon which can use non-HSM lenses? I love Nikon's overall quality, but feel like I'm being taken advantage of by the elimination of motorized bodies for non-motorized auto lenses. I think it's time to change?


Add a comment



Notify me of comments



Photography