Welcome to Photo.net: A Community of Photographers

Home > Equipment > Contax N1 System

Contax N1 System

by Philip Greenspun

Kyocera's Contax N1 system is a beautifully made combination of ultrasophisticated 35mm camera engineering and heavy results-oriented Zeiss lens designs. As in the Canon EOS system, all communication between body and lens is electronic. Each lens contains an ultrasonic focusing motor. If you can live with the limited range of lenses and accessories available, the newest Contax system is a viable and pleasant alternative to the standard professional brands.

Basics

The N1 was designed from the start for simultaneous Auto/Manual focus. The AF mode selector is on the back of the camera where it belongs and offers the following choices: Manual, Single, Continuous. If you have the selector set to Manual, pressing the button in the middle will give you a burst of autofocus. This is a perfect design and much less confusing than the festival of buttons and custom functions required to set up simultaneous AF/MF on Canon and Nikon bodies.

A bright and clear viewfinder provides good eye relief for eyeglass wearers and 95 percent image coverage. A dedicated depth-of-field preview button on lens mount makes it simple to check how your selected aperture will affect the image that you're about to record on film.

Power is from a 2CR5 lithium battery, good for between 20 and 50 rolls of 36 exposure film. If you add the P-9 battery holder, which includes a vertical shutter release, you can use AA batteries.

The N1 body lacks a built-in flash (the lower-priced Contax NX has a built-in flash). X sync speed is 1/250th, competitive with Canon, Minolta, and Nikon. The camera includes a PC terminal. Contax offers a full line of dedicated flashes to go with the N-series cameras.

For tripod use when you've forgotten the cable release, the self-timer can be set to a 2-second interval.

Innovations

The optional D-10 data back will print exposure data in between frames. That's not an innovation, though it is a welcome relief from data backs that violate the visible portion of the frame. What is innovative about the D-10 is that it can store up exposure data and finally, as the film is rewound, record those data on the first two frames of the roll.

For selecting among the five autofocus points, the N1 has a really nice joystick on the rear of the body. It is hard to describe or explain why this is better than equivalent controls on Canon or Nikon bodies that I've used but it really is a lot more intuitive.

An innovation whose utility is unproven is the N1's automatic focus bracketing function. You focus manually and the camera takes three exposures. One is where you focussed. One is a bit nearer and one is a bit farther. A lot of professionals do bracket focus, especially when they are too rushed to check depth of field critically, but whether the automatic system is really worth the user interface trouble is unclear.

The most interesting accessories for the N1 are an LCD viewfinder for remote camera operation and the ability to mount lenses from the delicious Contax 645 system.

Warts

The amount of applied exposure compensation is not displayed in the viewfinder exposure bargraph. A flashing +/- symbol reminds you that exposure comp is in place but you have to refer to the top-deck LCD or knob to verify the amount.

The body does not appear to be water-sealed. If you're planning to be working in heavy rain, the top-end Canon and Nikon bodies would appear to be better choices.

Setting custom functions is just as confusing as with Canon and Nikon bodies. You need to have the manual with you. It is a shame that Contax did not copy the Minolta Maxxum 7's self-explanatory multi-lingual rear LCD panel.

As of January 2002, Contax offers only a 24-85/3.5-4.5, a 70-300/4-5.6, a 50/1.4, and a 100/2.8 macro. Despite their slowness the zoom lenses are large heavy high quality tools. And the 50 and 100 (not tested) should be excellent. But if you are doing a project that requires extreme wide angles, perspective correction, or long telephotos you'll be renting some Nikon or Canon gear.

More

Readers' Comments


Add a comment



Joel Benford , January 24, 2002; 09:42 A.M.

FYI, you're right about the lack of water sealing. Contax USA reps have confirmed this on the Contax SLR mailing list.

There are a few more lenses just announced, though I expect they'll take a while to trickle out: 28-80mm f3.5-5.6 (probably a bit less expensive, aimed at the NX), 70-200mm f3.5-4.5 (probably not even slightly cheap), 17-35mm f2.8 (I dread to think).

No doubt more lenses will appear eventually, as Zeiss migrate or replace the exisiting manual focus line for the new mount. But I suspect it will take a while.

Bradley Phillip , January 24, 2002; 11:15 A.M.

A cautionary note: Be sure to have a good look at the AF system of the N1 before buying. Despite the fact that it uses EOS-inspired USM lenses, the camera does not focus as quickly or reliably as you might expect from a top-of-the-line Contax.

Your mileage may vary, but be sure to see if it's up to your standards before buying.

john van rosendaal , January 25, 2002; 12:33 P.M.

I've owned the Contax N1 plus the 24-85N and the 70-300N for little less than a year. I also own the Nikon F100, so I can draw a few comparisons. These comments are purely personal; I'm not a pro, can't draw wide comparisons, have never done scientific tests and have my own likes and dislikes about what kind of camera works for me.

First of all, I decided to go with Contax for the Carl Zeiss lenses it offers. I know it's a subjective feeling, but I prefer the color rendition and contrast of Carl Zeiss glass over Nikon glass (I've used an assortment of Nikon primes and the second generation 80-200/2.8 AF). If it wasn't for the lenses, I would not have bought the N1 and I still wouldn't.

Now for the camera. My likes:

- the intuitive setup of the camera functions. I like direct access to the controls that matter and hate having to use a camera as if it's a computer. All controls that matter on the N1 are immediately accessible and can be operated with one hand.

- the dual focus setup. As Phil writes, it's easy to switch between manual and auto focus, something that is hard to do on the Nikons (and even when the Nikon cameras allow it, the auto focus ring on the lenses is not always easily reachable). By the way, I have never used the auto focus bracketing function and don't think I'll ever need it.

- the auto focus setup. I agree with Phil that the joystick for selecting focus points is wonderful. It's one of these things that I would miss dearly if I were to give up on the N1. Also, the placement of the five focus areas is better suited to most photographic tasks than the placement on the F100.

- the flash system with the Contax 360 flash. It does a great job. (Then again, the F100 with the SB-28 is equally great).

- the clear viewfinder

- the solid feel of the camera. It oozes quality.

- the metering system. It's versatile and has never let me down.

My dislikes:

- the camera is heavy, esp with the USM lenses. I know this is part of 'the solid feel,' but my starter camera (a Pentax ME Super) was solid, yet small and light. The new Contax NX is much lighter, esp with the non-USM lenses that are offered for it. But after handling the NX in a store earlier this week, I was disappointed with the fact that some of the controls are not as easily accessible as on the N1.

- the auto focus is not as fast as on the F100. I have a few small children. Auto focus speed matters. I've missed a few shots of the kids that I probably would have gotten with the F100. On the other hand, in my experience the Nikon and Contax do equally well (or fail equally) at focusing on hard-to-focus subjects, making the Contax more user-friendly because of its dual-focus setup.

- the prices of the lenses. The lenses I have are much more expensive that comparable Nikon or Canon lenses and even more expensive than comparable f2.8 zooms for Nikon or Canon, while they're much slower. I shudder to think what the announced 17-35/2.8N will cost.

Since I can't justify holding on to both the Contax and the Nikon, I'm currently debating which one is going to go. They're both great cameras. I much prefer the final picture taken with the Contax over similar ones with the Nikon; I like the F100 for its speed, even though it's a speed I don't often need; I like the fact the Nikon is lighter; I like the fact that I can afford lenses for Nikon that I might not be able to afford for Contax; I like the controls on the N1 better than those on the F100. I'm still in the middle of this debate - with sideshows over whether I should ditch both the Contax and the Nikon and switch to a digital Canon D30 system and with longing looks at my once-trusty ME Super, with its broken light meter.

Einar Soyland , January 30, 2002; 10:03 A.M.

A correction to Phil's review. Exposure compensation displayed in the viewfinder _is_ possible.

Set custom function 6, value 2.

Regards Einar Soyland

Glen Johnson , February 02, 2002; 09:04 A.M.

I think one of the neatest aspects of the Contax N1 system is the Contax N1 Digital body. With a full 24mm x 36mm image capturing cell, it really looks like it is going to be one of the slickest digital cameras out there. As an integrated 35mm - medium format system, the N1, N1 Digital, and 645 represent an excellent effort. HOWEVER - I still think that if you shoot action or low light, or if you are concerned about package weight, it will be mighty hard to give up pro level Nikon or Canon systems even if you have an N1 or N1D to go with your 645.

Marc Williams - Franklin/Mich. , March 03, 2002; 06:14 A.M.

Regarding the slower focus aspect of the N-1 verses Canon USM or Nikon AFS: I found this due to most N1 owners using the first lenses which are slow ( f/3.5 or slower ) and all the lens elements employed in their movement. The 50mm,f/1.4 is considerably faster focusing than the Contax zooms. Compaired to my Canon 50mm, f/1.0 with it's enormous glass, the Contax 50/1.4 is a bolt of lightening. So, it depends on the lens speed ( more light/faster focusing) and how much glass the motor has to move. I suspect that the new Contax 17-35mm,f/2.8 will be relatively quicker, due to the faster aperture, but not as quick as its Canon and Nikon counterparts because of the number of elements it employs. I'll let everyone know as soon as my real estate agent unloads my house so I can buy the new Contax 17-35 ($2,500. at B&H, not including the hood! ). I also can't wait for the Contax 85/1.4. I suppose I'll have to dump my car to pay for it. That is, if it comes out in my lifetime. Best wishes, Marc Williams

Zhitao Yang , March 10, 2002; 11:42 A.M.

I am sure that Phil was not correct regarding the power comsumption. I have N1 plus the 50/1.4 and 24-85. I have to say that N1 is a battery killer. If shooting 36-frame films the 2CR5 will die after less than 6 or 7 rolls. I like my N1. I am waiting for something like 70-200/2.8.

Raymond

Jorge Diaz , May 02, 2003; 02:15 P.M.

I am considering buying this camera or the NX .Reason being that I own the 645 and some lenses and would appreciate comments in the direction of how well the 645 lenses work with the 35 mm format... Cropping?

Alan Willis , September 01, 2005; 01:57 P.M.

I love my Contax but the future seems questionable so I might hesitate to recommend someone get into Contax at this time. It's a pity, really, the camera is wonderful and the lenses are fantastic. Since you already have some of those fanstastic lenses from the 645 series, though, you should certainly be able to get the mount-adapter and an N camera for a reasonable price. Just don't expect a large variety of specifically N lenses to ever be available.


Add a comment



Notify me of comments



Photography