Your DSLR can take outstanding photos on its own in auto mode, so why would you want to switch to manual? This video tutorial will explain the reasons why as a photographer you might want full manual...
The 80-200/2.8 is one of the joys of the Nikon system and is mandatory for any
serious user. It is almost as sharp and contrasty as the Nikon prime lenses in
the 80-200 range. The constant aperture makes it convenient to use with studio
strobes. This is a review of the older one-touch version of the lens. The newer
lens is mentioned at the end and by readers in the comment server.
Although the300/2.8 is an important tool for a fashion photographer, the 80-200
is a more basic and versatile item. Even in the studio, it is very convenient to
be able to go from a full-length shot to head-and-shoulders simply by touching
the lens. The image at right was done with an SB-24 fill flash on my 8008 body;
You'll have to do like the calendar and greeting card photographers and stick
to either zoos or "wildlife model ranches" if your biggest lens is an 80-200.
Nonetheless, one can do some reasonable work with this focal length. The image at
right was taken in the National Zoo with a fixed Nikon 180 AF.
For isolating details or
compressing features in landscape photography, the 80-200 is perfect. The image
at right is slightly soft due to handholding at dusk close to 200. Note that the
image could not have been made at all with a consumer zoom lens and its f/5.6
aperture at 200mm. Nikon 8008/Fujichrome Velvia, f/2.8 and 1/125. Gruyere,
It takes about four seconds for a Nikon 8008 to rack the 80-200 from close
focus to infinity. That's enough time for your subject to get up and move to
Schenectady. The 80-200 is a big heavy lens without internal focus and the camera
is trying to turn all of this with a tiny little screwdriver blade protruding
from the body. I don't really know anyone who has successfully used an 80-200/2.8
in AF mode.
Using the lens
You'll want to keep this
lens with you at all times. Unfortunately, it weighs 3 lbs so you'll be
developing some new muscles and/or skeletal deformities should you attempt this.
Remember to hold your rig by the lens and not by the body; otherwise you risk
warping the camera's lens mount.
The Nikon is a one-touch zoom, i.e., the same ring controls both magnification
and focus. Push in and out on the ring to adjust focal length; twist to focus. If
you point the camera down or up, you will learn the meaning of "zoom creep" as
the focal length bangs into one of the ring's limit stops under the force of
gravity. The one-touch zoom also seems to keep Nikon from putting a tripod collar
on this lens. There are a few aftermarket collars on the market but I haven't
tried any of them. I often used the 80-200 with an 8008, 6006, and F4 on a tripod
and never noticed any warping of the lens mounts on the bodies. Still, the setup
is not exactly what you'd call balanced.
[Note: Kirk Enterprises makes what looks like a nice "EZ-360" tripod mount
($185). You can rotate the lens/camera 360 degrees and the base is itself an
Arca-style Q/R platform (it also can screw into a standard tripod head). Kirk is
at (800) 626-5074.]
You can buy an 80-200 for under $1000, which is rather a bargain when you
consider that the Canon equivalent is $1500. Also, the resale value is pretty
close to what you pay for a new lens; these lenses are in constant demand from
professionals. You can buy cheaper alternatives from Sigma and Tamron that are
probably OK. Tokina makes a substantially cheaper 80-200/2.8 that does not test
out particularly well (and I'm generally skeptical of Tokina's "professional"
lenses after a low contrast experience with their 28-70/2.8). Personally, I don't
think there is any reason to consider anything other than genuine Nikon. The
price is fair.
The new version
In 1996, Nikon introduced a new version of this lens. It is a two-touch design
(separate focus and zoom rings) with a tripod collar. Supposedly the optical
design is slightly better and the AF is much faster (though still not internal
focus or AF-S like it should be).