"From Light to Ink" featured the work of Canon Inspirers and contest winners, all printed using Canon's imagePROGRAF printers. The gallery show revolved around the discussion of printing photographs...
Getting photographs right in the camera is a combination of using your imagination, creativity, art, and technique. In Part 3 of this three part series, we focus on shooting strategy and the role of...
Pending a full review of the D100, this preview article attempts to illustrate
the features as well as the strong and weak points of this newly announced camera
The Nikon D100 is a 6 megapixel digital SLR, supporting Nikon's extensive
array of (AF) lenses and accessoires. It is targeted at the advanced amateur
("prosumer") and the professional user. The D100 fills the gap between the
cheaper and simpler Coolpix cameras (such as the
Coolpix 5000) and the more expensive,
professional D1 series (see the reviews of the
At the moment, pricing is not yet certain.
The main features are:
6 megapixel ( 3008 x 2000 pixels) CCD imager
1/4,000 sec. top shutter speed and flash sync speed up to 1/180 sec.
USB 1.1 interface and Nikon View 5 software for computer connectivity.
8 bit-per-channel JPEG and 12 bit-per-channel RAW formats
supports Compact Flash type I and II cards, as well as IBM Microdrive.
The D100, as seen on Nikon's website and in their brochures, looks like a
digital N80 (F80 outside the USA). This is somewhat confusing, since the D100
name seems to imply it is a digital
F100. Instead, the D1H and D1X look like
digital F100s. I guess it is reasonable to expect N80-like build quality and (AF)
performance. Some interesting features of this camera, particularly when compared
to the D1H and D1X series, are:
6 megapixel resolution: this is much better than the D1H and actually
even better than the D1X, although we will have to wait and see if the image
quality is as good as well. Perhaps the D1 series cameras will provide
better results at higher ISO speeds or longer exposure times.
On-demand grid lines: as in the N80 / F80, these can be very helpful
when taking photos of architecture.
Smaller, lighter body: the vertical grip is optional and leaving it
out (and mounting a lens like the AF 35/2D) will make the D100 a small and yet
powerful package. If the D100 can manage a full day shoot on a single battery, it
would be a super package indeed. A D1 series camera, because of the larger body
and non-removable grip, is always going to be very bulky and heavy.
Built-in flash: although generally speaking on-camera flash is
probably the worst lighting you can have for your photographs, a built-in flash
can be a great help. If it is too dark for available light photography, the flash
helps to at least get a shot. But more importantly, a built-in flash can provide
a little fill flash for an outdoor portrait. This can be very important as high
contrast can easily overpower an 8-bit JPEG.
Use of a simple cable release. The specifications are not very clear
on this point, but it would appear that the D100 has the same threaded shutter
release button as the N80. This would enable the use of a simple, mechanical
cable release (available for EUR 15, versus EUR 100 for an MC-30). I admit this
is a bit of a pet peeve of mine...
The CCD is the same size as the one in the D1 series (23.7 by 15.6 mm), which
is considerably smaller than 35mm film. It means that focal lengths are
effectively multiplied by 1.5, resulting in a tighter crop of the image. An
80-200 zoom becomes a 120 - 300 zoom with more telephoto power, but a 24-85 zoom
becomes a 36 - 128 lens with a somewhat disappointing wide-angle coverage.
For their APS SLR cameras, Nikon has designed a couple of special IX lenses.
It surprises me that they have not made a special "DX" series for their digital
cameras. A true wide-angle, a compact standard lens and a nice portrait lens
would be welcomed by many, I believe. Perhaps they expect to launch a full-size
sensor camera soon enough not to be bothered with an intermediate solution like
The most appropriate lenses for this camera are the modern AF, AF-D and AF-S
lenses. Older lenses without a CPU can be used, but then the built-in exposure
meter does not work. This applies to certain modern film cameras as well. I think
a camera in this class should support older lensesa s well -- every now and then
I still use an old AI 50/2 or AI 24/2.8 lens on my Nikon F100.
The optional MB-D100 vertical grip allows the camera to run on 6 AA-size
(penlight) batteries. Unlike the MB-15 for the F100 and the D1H built-in grip,
this one does replicate both the command wheel and the subcommand wheel (the
subcommand wheel is used to set the aperture, particularly with AF-G lenses which
do not have an aperture ring). It also features a voice/memo recording / playback
function and a 10-pin connector for an (MC-30) remote control.
The D100 supports the latest in Nikon flash technology, but only with a new
DX-type flash, such as the SB-28DX or SB-80DX. With older flashes, only non-TTL
(i.e., primitive) flash is possible.
Nikon film users
The big question for many Nikon film users is whether or not to go digital
now. Except for professional photographers, the D1 series is too expensive for
most and the D100 might just be cheap enough to buy it.
I am not going to order a D100 right away. Obviously, I want to test it first,
or at the very least read a few reports by others. But something else is
important for me as well. I have invested quite a bit in film-specific equipment
over the last couple of years (F100, MB-15 grip, SB28 flash, Coolscan III
scanner) and I do not want to "dump" that gear for a digital substitute just yet.
Also, if a complete D100 kit is going to be priced similar to the Canon EOS D60
pro kit (currently $3400 here in the Netherlands), it will cost too much to be
considered an extra body.
I do not spend over $1000 per year on film and development and I even like
editing -- a Schneider 4x or 10x loupe really makes a properly exposed Velvia
slide look great. If, however, you do spend $1000 or more and do not mind staring
at a computer display, buying a D100 makes perfect sense.
As an aside, I also like working with digital images, using Photoshop to make
them look as good as possible and sharing them on the Web. In fact, I do not
particularly enjoy the scanning process itself, nor am I too keen on sleeving
negatives and pasting pictures. So, one day I will probably switch to digital. I
also do not expect to buy more film-specific equipment, such as a second
The most obvious competitor is the
D60. In many ways the cameras are likely to give similar performances. It is
not unreasonable to expect similar pricing as well (though Nikon cameras tend to
be slightly more expensive than their Canon counterparts).
How to decide between D60 and D100? If you already own Canon lenses, consider
the D60. Likewise, if you own Nikkors, consider the D100. If you own neither, the
choice may be quite difficult. Carefully take into account the entire system; you
may like to have a Nikon FM3A as a backup film camera, or you may like Canon's
MP-E 65mm 1-5X macro lens. Also, be sure
to try the cameras in a photo shop. Camera handling is very personal and very
The older and more expensive
D1H cameras are competitors as well. The D1H,
while offering only 2.6 megapixels, is surely going to be much faster. Sadly, it
is beginning to look outdated and most people except photojournalists, will
probably not buy it. Both D1X and D1H have a FireWire interface for faster image
transfer, offer faster maximum shutter and flash synch speeds and will
undoubtedly have a better build quality. They may also have better image quality.
However, for many "prosumers" and even professionals, the D100 may well prove to
be equally good in actual use.
In fact, I would not be surprised if, after the launch of the D100, Nikon will
introduce a new professional model (perhaps at Photokina 2002?). Combining D1H
speed and D1X resolution, and perhaps improving on both by having a larger
sensor, would ensure a clearer disinction between prosumer and professional.
If you do not mind depending on Sigma for lenses, the Foveon X3-based
Sigma SD9 is a valid alternative too. Although it
offers only 3.5 megapixels, the X3 chip may yet surprise us with image