A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Home > Equipment > Pentax FA* 300/4.5

Most Popular Lenses

Moms, Dads & Grads Gift Guide Read More

Moms, Dads & Grads Gift Guide

Happy Mother's Day! Happy Father's Day! Happy Graduation! Photo.net has great photography gift ideas for the Mom, Dad, or Grad in your life. Shop for camera bags, lenses, DSLRs, and more...

Latest Equipment Articles

Sony NEX-F3 Preview Read More

Sony NEX-F3 Preview

Bob Atkins previews Sony's newest NEX body the F3

Latest Learning Articles

Concert and Live Music Photography: Clubs, Bars, and Small Venues Read More

Concert and Live Music Photography: Clubs, Bars, and Small Venues

Clubs, bars, and small venues are the places where most concert and live music photographers get their start, the reason being that there are fewer restrictions since the performers are less likely to...


Pentax FA* 300/4.5

by Mark Erickson, 1998


The FA* lens series is the top series from Pentax. I purchased my FA* 300mm F4.5 lens in February 1998. I have taken it whale watching off the California coast, to several state and national parks local to the San Fransisco Bay area, and on an extended sea kayaking trip in Kenai Fjords National Park in Alaska.

Build

The lens has a solid, well-made metal feel to it. The barrel surface is coated with a silver finish that seems to be fairly durable (mine has no scratches or nicks on it so far, but I haven't dropped it yet, either). The focus barrel locks in place under autofocus operation. Pulling it towards the camera body engages a clutch in the lens and enables manual focus operation. The clutching operation feels solid and secure, and the focusing feel is solid, if a little light. The lens hood (included) snaps into place via a set of cool spring-loaded rollers.

Optical

The lens uses 9 elements in 7 groups and includes ED glass and an internal focusing design. The minimum focusing distance of 2 meters is close enough to use to photograph some larger flowers. It uses 67mm filters (the same size as the 24mm and 85mm FA* lenses). The front element is deeply recessed inside the barrel. I have not seen any flare from photos taken with this lens with the hood in place.

Handling

I like it! I believe that this lens is a bit lighter and shorter than at least some comparable offerings from Canon, Nikon, Minolta, etc. The one feature that it does not have is a tripod collar. I typically use it for wildlife and nature photography and would use a collar a lot. I have a Bogen 3420 long lens support that is a passable substitute, but putting it on is a bit of a hassle. Fortunately, the quick-release on the 3420 is compatible with the quick release on Bogen's affordable ball-head, the 3262QR.

[Editors Note: Some users look for the older SMC-F lens used, as it has a tripod mount fitted]

Price

I bought mine in February 1998 for $800 from B&H. Compared to similar lenses from other makers, this seems to be a pretty good price.

My Sample

My lens produces very sharp images. It is significantly sharper than the Sigma APO Macro 70-300 zoom that I have used previously. The shot on this page is an image of a sleeping Elephant Seal that was taken at Ano Nuevo state park on the California coast between Santa Cruz and Half Moon Bay. It is not a particularly good picture, but it demonstrates the real-world properties of the lens quite well. The image was taken hand-held wide open (F4.5 at 1/500th sec) on Fuji Sensia 100 film. The original PhotoCD image is on the left (the only image processing was color balancing). I autofocused on the sleeping seal, recomposed, and took the shot. On the right is the zoomed-up seal nose. This section corresponds to about a 2mm by 3mm rectangle near the edge of the original slide.

At 1536x1024, the image resolution is about 43 pixels per mm. The seal whiskers are about 4 pixels apart. This is equivalent to about 10 line pairs per mm. The whiskers extremely well seperated by the lens. Again, the image was taken wide-open (at F4.5) and the whiskers are significantly off-center in the image.

On a less positive note, I recently discovered that my sample doesn't quite focus all the way to infinity. My ZX-5 autofocus hits the stop and makes an odd noise when I try to focus on, say, a mountain 10 miles away. I get the same results when I mount the lens on my P-3n body and try to manually focus with the split-image viewfinder. I will most likely be sending this lens back to Pentax for adjustment some time soon.

Conclusion

This lens is compact, sharp and has excellent build quality. I believe that the price is pretty good as compared to similar offerings from the other major brands. The lack of a tripod collar is a (minor) inconvenience. My sample's inability to focus all the way to infinity is a bit more of a concern.

Editor's Note:

Where to Buy

The SMC FA 300 is stocked by Adorama, a retailer that pays photo.net a referral fee for each customer, which helps keep this site in operation. For additional retailer information, see our recommended retailers page and the user recommendations section.


copyright 1998 Mark Erickson maericks@netcom.com

Article created 1998

Readers' Comments


Add a comment



Mark Lindamood , July 28, 1998; 08:53 A.M.

For those who consider their existing collection of filters when selecting lenses, the FA*28-70 f2.8 also utilizes 67mm filters. Among older lenses, the A*85 and F*300 do, too, along with the SMC-A 35-105 f3.5.

Steve Graham , July 29, 1998; 10:04 A.M.

67mm is quite a common FA* filter size I think - both my 24mm F2 and 85mm F1.4 use it too.

Mark Erickson , March 29, 2001; 11:23 A.M.

Update: Pentax fixed my lens under warrantee. It now focuses just past infinity (like an AF lens should).

Steve Smith , December 17, 2002; 04:42 P.M.

I recently purchased (used) the older F* version of this lens, which is often sought after because, unlike the FA*, it comes with a tripod collar (it also has a very nice built-in lenshood). For those trying to decide between the two there are some other things that should be taken into consideration (although I believe both models use the same optical formula).

The F* has two things which might be problematic for some users: 1.) the aperture ring is tiny and hard to reach if the tripod collar is attached (a minor problem, & not really a problem at all with the PZ-1p - except when you want to use depth-of-field preview), 2.) when the manual focus ring is engaged, the autofocus mechanism is not disengaged. This means that in order to focus manually you have to switch not only the lens off autofocus but the camera body off autofocus as well. You probably won't enjoy this if you expect to be switching to and from manual focus often.

While the FA* lacks the tripod collar and the built-in hood, it does have a true autofocus disengage clutch mechanism. And, at least with a PZ-1p, I don't think the lens is so heavy that the lack of a tripod collar is that big of a deal.

For me, the F* is the better choice (having the ability to turn the camera from a horizontal to a vertical position without adjusting the tripod is much more useful to me than the ability switch quickly from auto to manual focus and back again). Your needs may differ, of course.


Add a comment



Notify me of comments