A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Film and Processing > B&W negative > Panatomic-X, A Look Back

Featured Equipment Deals

25 Creative Photos of Sunflowers Read More

25 Creative Photos of Sunflowers

From bud to decay, a sampling of beautiful sunflower photos by photo.net members.

Latest Equipment Articles

Sun Position Tracking Apps Read More

Sun Position Tracking Apps

These 5 apps, ranging in price from free to $8.99, are our top picks for tracking sun (and moon) light. Also ranging in complexity, some help you keep tabs on the ideal lighting of the day while...

Latest Learning Articles

Basic Image Development in Lightroom: Color Editing (Video Tutorial) Read More

Basic Image Development in Lightroom: Color Editing (Video Tutorial)

Learn basic HSL (hue, saturation, and luminance) color adjustments as well as split toning (adjusting color in highlights and lowlights) in this next video.


Panatomic-X, A Look Back

Tom Hildreth , Jul 24, 2005; 09:01 p.m.

As a person whose primary effort has been amateur photography of transportation subjects, I followed the general trend of many in this field who converted from MF for black and white to Kodak 5060 Panatomic-X in 35mm. This ASA 32 film offered very fine grain required for detailed full-frame shots of aircraft, locomotives and related subjects. I believe Kodak referred to this as an extremely fine grain film.

Of course I often had this film in my camera when other subjects were available, and while recently looking at some of my negatives from the mid-1970s, I was surprised to see how well this film worked on dull days. I was occasionally able to take action shots with it as well, as you will see. I did not always have an appropriate B&W filter on the lens, and as can be expected, a featureless sky was the cost.

A photographer looking for fine grain B&W films today has a surprising number of choices. At ISO 50, Ilford Pan-F is still available, and although the wonderful Agfa 25 is gone, I see considerable talk of Efke in ISO 25. My compromise has been to use TMAX-100 and Delta 100, and I have been quite satisfied with both for my application.

Here are a few samples of a bygone film that in my opinion, really had no equal.


Superb for full-frame shots of aircraft, such as this Argus Mk.I.

Responses


    1   |   2   |   3   |   4   |   5     Next    Last

Tom Hildreth , Jul 24, 2005; 09:04 p.m.

The Aldrich Mills water wheel


Even on a dull day, the Aldrich Mills water wheel in South Hadley, Massachusetts looked pretty good on Panatomic-X

Tom Hildreth , Jul 24, 2005; 09:06 p.m.

Panatomic-X A Look Back

Aldrich Mills water wheel


Nearly grainless detail of mill from previous shot

Tom Hildreth , Jul 24, 2005; 09:08 p.m.

Response to Panatomic-X,

Some guys summer home, way back when


Taken while on a boat tour of New York's Thousand Islands

Tom Hildreth , Jul 24, 2005; 09:11 p.m.

Panatomic-X

Big river


Spring runoff at the Holyoke dam in Massachusetts can be dramatic if there has been substantial snow melt up north.

Michael Ging , Jul 24, 2005; 09:11 p.m.

Tom , I shot with Panatomic-X and developed in Microdol-X 1 to 3. I made some prints up and took them around the Lab.People could not tell them from 120 film and even 4x5. I have a half a dozen rolls of Agfa 25 in the freezer that are kept for special photographs. I too miss the slow, fine grained films, of the past.

Tom Hildreth , Jul 24, 2005; 09:12 p.m.

A Look Back

Pastoral view


This film lent itself to scenic photography quite nicely

Tom Hildreth , Jul 24, 2005; 09:13 p.m.

Into the Hoosac range


And it could be pressed into service for action shots as well.

Scott Pickering "25 ASA" , Jul 24, 2005; 09:13 p.m.

Though I didn't use it too many times when it was actually out (I just started doing photography), I have since bought some rolls on the auction site and have used it quite a few times these past couple years. The film has held up quite well considering its age. Even the non cold stored bulk roll is fine. I find Pan X looks very similar to Pan F. Efke 25 looks to me more contrasty yet. I haven't used to many rolls of APX 25 to compare, though I do have some. It would be interesting to shoot all 4 rolls of this stuff, scan them, and compare results. I like Pan X.


Attachment: PanX.jpg

Tom Hildreth , Jul 24, 2005; 09:18 p.m.

Thought you might like to see what I was able to do with this film. It was available in 120, and though I used a couple of rolls of it the subjects were boring and I never attempted to make a large print from the negatives. There was an Aero Panatomic-X in ASA 40, though I never used that version.


    1   |   2   |   3   |   4   |   5     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses