A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Featured Equipment Deals

Missing Pages: White Balance Read More

Missing Pages: White Balance

Jon Sienckiewicz offers a juiced-up User Guide for creative people via his "Missing Pages" column on Photo.net. This month covers the topic of White Balance.

Latest Equipment Articles

4 Outdoor & Adventure Photo Packs Read More

4 Outdoor & Adventure Photo Packs

Photo packs have come a long way in the past decade, especially those that are targeted toward outdoor and adventure photographers. Alaska-based adventure photographer Dan Bailey takes a closer look...

Latest Learning Articles

25 Autumn Scenery Photos Read More

25 Autumn Scenery Photos

Fall is upon us yet again and to celebrate this colorful season, here are 25 scenes of autumn captured by photo.net members.


Hoya S-HMC vs. S-HMC Pro1

Jeremy Turner , May 24, 2004; 03:48 a.m.

Hi

Does anyone have hands-on experience with these filters, particularly the circular polarizers? How does the Pro1 version compare with the S- HMC? Also, how does the Pro1 (or the S-HMC) polarizer compare with B+W's MRC filters?

Any thoughts on this would be most welcome before I take the plunge.

Cheers

Jeremy

Responses

David Choo , May 24, 2004; 05:17 a.m.

When comparing Hoya S-HMC vs S-HMC Pro 1, in terms of image quality, you will find absolutely no difference.

If you use super wide angle lenses, the Pro 1's might be a good investment. Althought I never vignette with the non Pro 1's at 16mm. I think this has more to do with construction of the lens by the manufacturer you use.

I personally don't use more then 1 filter at a time, unless its some type of color correction filter with a ND grad like the Lee system, in which case, the regular S-HMC are just fine, even at 16mm.

In terms of polarizers, I do believe a slim line version is well worth the investment.

B+W MRC filter quality is the same as the Hoya. You'll be hard pressed to find any difference. I use both and have never found a difference in quality between the two.

The two differences I found which can be incredible important are the fact that B+W uses brass rings. (Not everyone needs this) And B+W usually has less of a f-stop loss as compared to other manufacturers.

Hope this helps.

Daniel Taylor , May 24, 2004; 05:29 a.m.

The "Pro" filters are just thinner. You would use them on wide angle and zoom lenses where vignetting might be a problem. Otherwise the S-HMC filters are optically the same.

I've been quite happy with my S-HMC UV filters. On numerous occasions I've shot identical scenes with and without them, and I have yet to notice any difference between shots. They do not seem to introduce any additional flare. Now I just leave them on at all times to protect my lenses.

I've never compared them to B+W.

David Lau , May 24, 2004; 06:32 a.m.

While I am very satisfy with the optical quality and the thicknesss (very thin) of my Pro 1 CPL filter, I don't like the lens cap that come with it. Since Pro 1 is very thin, the clip on cap that comes with the lens does not fit onto it. Hoya provides a push on one with the filter but after some use it tends to become too loose and falls out easily. I have 3 Pro 1 filters and all of them have the same problem.

I am now looking at buying 3rd party cap that can secure onto the filter and the lens.

Bryce JFG , May 25, 2004; 06:24 p.m.

Having recently completed some very serious filter shopping... and becoming very confused, I think many would find this website very helpful:

Robin Kantra Photographic Supply

Unfortunately, they don't carry B+W, so they don't have any info to clarify the oh-so-subtle and obscure descriptions, but very un-subtle price differences between the varieties of B+W filters; but they do have very clear descriptions about Hoya's variations.

The descriptions and information is refreshingly honest too!

They carry Heliopan, instead of B+W as their top-of-the-line. I have no personal experience with Heliopan, but I would note that you might want to do a search on Photo.Net and read what others have said before buying.

Jeremy Turner , May 30, 2004; 08:14 p.m.

Thanks everyone for your replies. I've decided to go with the Pro1 versions, because of their thickness, as I do a lot of very wide angle shooting.

Cheers

Jeremy

Landscape Photography by Jeremy Turner

David Henderson , May 30, 2004; 08:40 p.m.

I think you've made the right decision. I have two B+W polarisers and the Hoya super Pro 1 . After using the B+W for years - and indeed I also had their "slim " MC product until I dropped it - I now use the Hoya every time I polarise. I just find it has a cleaner look than I was getting with B+W and the combination of a very slim filter with a front thread is unusual and useful. No doubt the mount is flimsier and lighter than the B+W equivalent. But optically i think its better and gives truer colour.

Paul Calamai , Oct 31, 2007; 12:54 p.m.

According to my sources (i.e. Hoya) the Pro 1 Digital and the S-HMC circular polarizers are both the exact same thickness, namely 5mm. The difference is that the S-HMC has 7 layers of coating compared to the 3 on the Pro 1 but the Pro 1 has double treading whereas the S- HMC doesn't. As well, the Pro 1 has "digital" multicoating (whatever that means), a black almite frame (reduces reflections), and black rimmed glass (ditto). Oh, and the Pro 1 Digital package is blue whereas the S-HMC package is black.

Back to top

Notify me of Responses