Allan Birch , Apr 28, 2007; 08:21 p.m.
Hello everyone! This is my first post on photo.net. I just want to solicit
opinions on the above tripods. I have been doing what everyone else does with
regard to purchasing a tripod and ball head and that is looking for months and
agonizing on trying to make a decision, but always changing my mind at the last
minute. Anyway, I think I'm getting close! These are the finalists:
Gitzo 2530 6X- Finally looked at one today. Very sturdy I must say and the
weight is good. I don't think I want to go under 3lbs or much more than 4. Not
overly impressed with the twist locks. First they had oil or grease on the
threads when they were unscrewed. The legs were very tight and did not slide in
and out as smoothly as I would have thought for its price. The more I read about
this tripod I was ready to order, but after tinkering with it I think I will let
someone else pay $520 price tag.
Manfrotto 055MF3 - Overall I think Manfrotto makes a quality aluminum tripod. I
have the 3001BPRO and if it was a few inches taller I probably would not be
making this post. Anyway, I like the 055MF3 and I thought the price is fair at
$315, but the legs just do not seem like they would support the 15.5lbs
Manfrotto claims with good stability. The weight is good and the height is close
enough that I still have to keep this one in mind before making my final
decision. Again, I wasn't real impressed with the legs on this tripod. They had
the same problem as the Gitzo in that they stick and don't slide in and out
smoothly. The plus for this tripod is I prefer flip locks to twist.
Induro C213 8X- This tripod looks very tempting, but I have not found one to
look at. My interest peaked after looking at the C313 8X. I was very impressed
with its stability and the how easily the legs slide in and out, but this tripod
is very tall (61 inches without the center column extended). The C313 have 32mm
diameter leg measured at the top (very large compared to other tripods), while
the C213 is 28mm which is probably still larger than the Gitzo or Manfrotto.
This tripod (C213) also has the best height for me without extending the center
column. It is a very nice looking tripod and the $370 price tag makes it very
tempting.
Velbon 630A - Another tripod I have not looked at in person. It has the flip
lock legs and a $289 price tag. The personal reviews I have read were favorable
and the weight (3.4lbs), height w/o the column extended 55 inches, load capacity
25lbs and flip locks vs twist are an advantage. Anyone that owns one your feed
back would be appreciated.
Ball heads - I've decided on the Markins 10L or 20L. I've considered RRS,
Arca-Swiss, Kirk and a few others but now its deciding between the 10L and 20L.
Finally, my equipment:
Canon 5D and 24-105 L. Sometime by the years end I will be purchasing the Sigma
100-300 f4.
Manfrotto 3001BPro which I love but is only 47 inches without center column
extended.
Manfrotto 3265 ball head which I am not crazy about. Using the 3001BPro and 3265
in a slight breeze I can detect vibrations on my 24-105 @105mm.
Anyway thank you for reading and your feedback is appreciated.
Allan
Craig Gillette
, Apr 28, 2007; 09:04 p.m.
I would find it hard to buy a tripod without having at least seen it and checked it in a store. Of the gear you mentioned, I have the 3265 and it's due back from being "maintained" any day now. I'd expect that if having to raise the center column on the 3001 was an issue at all, then it would add to the vibration potentials. I never noticed any huge vibration problems with my gear, but nothing was equivalent in size/weight to the 100-300 Sigma.
Here's what I might suggest. Replace the 3265 first. With the Markins you will also be going to a different qr system. I think no small amount of the vibration issue is a combination of the leverage of the 3265 and the rc2 system and the 3001. With a new head, you eliminate most of that. If you like the way the new head/qr performs and then the only issue is the 3001 is too short, then you could consider the 3021 series. If you still experience what seems to be too much slack/vibration in the 3001/Markins combo, then you can decide if you need to bounce right past the similarly rated Manfrotto cf or aluminum tripods. The fittings, I believe are pretty much the same but the CF is supposed to damp better.
I would suggest, if checking things in a store, try to find one with a hard surface floor. I checked a couple of head/leg combinations recently and am left wondering if some of the sag was related to the commercial carpet and not the "system."
Edward Ingold 
, Apr 28, 2007; 09:50 p.m.
If you can afford a Gitzo, you won't be disappointed. It will last a lifetime.
Gitzo legs are stiff because they have two "piston" rings at the upper end with a clearance of about 0.003". This is to prevent wobble. Notice that Gitzo legs have no wobble when fully extended, even before the collar is tightened. The collars, unlike clamps, are intrinsically self-adjusting and, incidently, snag-free.
Bruce Cahn 
, Apr 29, 2007; 12:57 a.m.
I have had Gitzos for years. Currently I have 4. The company was sold a few years ago to the co. that makes Manfrotto. They have not been as good since. I would still buy one though if I needed it. Manfrotto is the brand that used to be called Bogen. When I set up my photo studio quite a few years ago I got a tripod, light stands and a clamp from Bogen. Everything broke in a relatively short period of time. The plastic knobs just twisted off the lightstands. They had been put over regular bolts, instead of being designed into them. Except for the clamp which worked fine, everything else broke. Now I have a photostore and refuse to sell Manfrotto for that reason.
Dan Mitchell , Apr 29, 2007; 12:58 a.m.
I'm happy - not disappointed - with my Induro C313. I was also a bit concerned about
purchasing a brand that is relatively unknown, but two things convinced me. First, Michael
Reissman gave it a favorable review after using on (the C413) in Antartica. Second, I had a
chance to handle one a couple of times at a SF Bay Area photo dealer where it was set up
next to Gitzo, Manfrotto, and others.
I have now had a chance to put it though its paces on several trips: Death Valley Yosemite
Valley and others. It has performed very well.
I use mine with an Acratech Ballhead. My camera is mostly a 5D with 17-40, 24-105,
70-200 f/4 and 50mm f/1.4.
I think it competes well with some of the other high quality tripods.
Dan
Guy Kisling , Apr 30, 2007; 02:29 p.m.
I recently went through the same diliberation and you can see a couple of my posts here in this forum. I finally purchased the Gitzo 2540 with the Markins 20L. I ordered the RRS BH-55. I liked the Markins significantly more. It's an excellent combination. I shoot a Mark IIn and the 70-200 is my largest lens, with plans of adding a 100-400 at some point.
John Wright
, May 01, 2007; 10:33 a.m.
Hi Allan,
I've had a Bogen 3221 legset for years (nearly 20!) with no major problems. My only complaint was vibration with telephotos when fully extended.
I recently bought a Gitzo 3530 legset. The legs slide out easily with a light pull, so I wonder if you saw a bad sample with the 2530. Fully extended, there is zero vibration with my 300mm. It is slightly over 4 pounds, and roughly the same dimensions as the Bogen 3221. It is over a pound lighter than the 3221 legs while supporting about 3x the weight. I find the twist locks easy and fast. Maybe not quite as fast as the Bogen flip locks but I really cannot complain. It sets up quickly and quietly. The anti-leg rotation feature is great. I think the centerpost is way too long, no need for that much (if you need more, you should get a longer set of legs to start with); I removed it.
I have no experience with the other brands you listed. You have already decided on your ballhead so I won't comment except to say I'm quite happy with my Kirk BH-1. Regardless of the brand, I'd go for whatever will support the most weight.
Sam Saliba , Sep 26, 2007; 12:10 p.m.
Hi All:
I recently have been shopping for a new Tripod to replace my old Velbon (don't quite remember the model#). I've always leaned towards buying a Gitzo but in my early days of Photography this was not possible since college expenses got in the way.
Well my personal finances are certainly better now and decided it's time to upgrade the Velbon so I started shopping about couple of months ago. Between all the name brands out there, I narrowed down my search to two, Gitzo vs Induro since they're features were so similar.
First, I bought the Induro CX214 ($400). The main selling points were as follows: 1) Price, 2) 8x Carbon layers, 3) Extra accessories. However, after trying it out on my first Photo trip, the Tripod failed the test. Two of the leg locks were defective, when I exended the legs and tried to lock them they wouldn't and you keep twisting to infinity. Initially I thought that maybe it's a fluke and despite the twisting issue, the legs seemed sturdy enough but as soon as I tried to add some weight pressure they collapsed. Unfortunately, as much as I wanted to save money by giving the Induro a chance but I ended returning it. To me, it did not seem trust worthy enough to chance it with my Camera and Lenses, especially when you're shooting outdoors.
I exchanged it with the Gitzo GT2540 ($550). Selling points are: LIFETIME WARRANTY, Carbon Material is better and crossed layered as suppose to Parallel (Induro), G Locks for legs are firmly secured and no twisting. Yes, I did spend an extra $150 but my mind is at ease knowing that the failure rate is virtually 0, and most importantly Gitzo's craftsmanship is unmatched.
In conclusion, for me, Gitzo is the winner, if you can "bite the bullet" for the extra $100-$150, don't short change yourself. I don't plan on buying a tripod soon and knowing that Gitzo is trustworthy with your expensive equipment as well as carries a lifetime warranty, it's totally worth the extra investment.