Joe Egge , May 07, 2002; 07:06 p.m.
Has anyone out there tried Fuji's new holder and 8 sheet cassette. I have spoken with the importer. He says it is not distributed to the U S. It consists of a holder and a light tight cassette with 8 septa. It operates similar to a Grafmatic. The Cassette comes preloaded with film...RDP or Velvia. Once this film is exposed or discarded, the septa can be reloaded with the 4X5 film of your choice. I would like to hear from someone who has used this system before I spring for $250. Thanks.
<p>
Joe Egge
Portland, OR
Alec Jones , May 07, 2002; 09:33 p.m.
Matthew Runde , May 07, 2002; 10:52 p.m.
<a name="1">Joe,</a>
<p>
Robert White has <a
href="http://www.robertwhite.co.uk/accessories.htm#LabelQuickchange">
info on this system</a>.
tim atherton , May 07, 2002; 11:30 p.m.
$250.00!
<p>
$149.00 at badger (not sure if that includes the film)
John Hennessy , May 07, 2002; 11:53 p.m.
It's great (so far -- about six cycles with 4 cassettes.)
<p>
You will need to practice unloading and loading with scrap film; it's
a bit tricky
Adam Gibbs , May 08, 2002; 12:17 a.m.
Joe, I've been using the Quickchange holder for a few months now and
it is working out very well. Actually I just purchased a couple more
inserts from Badger Graphics that just happen to be on sale. The
reason for my initial purchase was the lack of availability of
Readyload type films in Canada and getting the readyloads from the
States with our dismal dollar is just too expensive for us Canucks.
After using the holder for a while now I think I would use it instead
of readyload regardless of price. The quickchange is very economical
and peels a lot of weight and bulk from my back. The holder is well
built and the inserts sturdy enough to use over and over including
the counter. Just make sure you practice using the holder a few
times, it could be really easy to fog eight sheets all at once.
Paul Schilliger , May 08, 2002; 03:10 a.m.
Would any of you, users, believe that the cassettes are strong enough to be reloaded indefinitely or are they just
good enough to be reloaded a few times? I guess you have to unload them and not send them to the lab where they
would be considered as single use material?
Pete Caluori , May 08, 2002; 11:06 a.m.
Adam Gibbs , May 08, 2002; 11:45 a.m.
Paul, I think that with normal field use the inserts should last a
very long time. The inserts are plastic but seem to be very solid for
a supposedly one time use item, I guess only time will tell. At
present I carry the extra inserts in their cardboard boxes, much like
the Quickload films. Eventually I'll probably make a padded bag of
some sought to carry all the extra inserts.
Paul Schilliger , May 08, 2002; 01:28 p.m.
Thanks Adam. I am a Quickload afficionado but these films are no longer imported on a regular base here in
Switzerland. The Quickchange would also be a good way of using my stock of frozen outdated films in travel, despite
my previous decision never to bother with loading film in the field. But the inserts are very expensive and unless
they last forever, I would never buy.
<p>
Pete, thanks for the outstanding page on the system!
Dan Montgomery , May 08, 2002; 01:41 p.m.
I use the QuickChange and like it, seems durable enough but;
I'm not as impressed as with the size and weight savings. Yes, it
holds 8 films but because the cartridge holder is metal, the holder
with film weighs about the same as three regular dual-film holders.
And because the QuickChange is longer, and comes with a thickness-
adding padded sleeve that is too nice not to use, it takes up at
least as much volume in my pack as three regular holders. So really
it only saves the weight and space of one traditional holder. Nice,
but not revolutionary.
Adam Gibbs , May 08, 2002; 04:07 p.m.
Dan you're right if you use just the holder and one cartridge, but if
you use more than one insert the weight and bulk are quite a bit
less. I just stacked the holder with one cartridge inserted and three
extras without their boxes, combined they take up the same amount of
space as eight regular holders. My weight and bulk has been cut by
roughly half, more if you use more cartridges. The cartridges are
expensive but as I mentioned Badger Graphics has some dated
cartridges on sale $25.00 each not bad. I think the Quickchange is a
great compromise between weight and expense and in some cases film
avilability. The nice thing about Readyload type films is the ability
to write info on each paper covering, film stays clean and that you
don't have to load film late at night cramped up in a tent somewhere.
The downside is the film is expensive and for me as mentioned above
not available in Canada :(.
Thilo Schmid , May 09, 2002; 08:25 a.m.
<p>Paul,</p>
<p>the cartridges do certainly not last forever. But they will
sustain a hundred
reloads without any problems, if you take care and:</p>
<ul>
<li>rotate the counter only clockwise</li>
<li>be careful when inserting new sheets.</li>
</ul>
<p>The plastic plates that hold the film are not very solid, because
they must be thin enough to store 8 films in limited space.
However, if one is worn out some day, you can still keep the
cartridge and
exchange parts with others. So they actually fade away instead of
being useless
at once.</p>
<p>I am in quite often in Basel can give you a QuickChange
demonstration, if you
you are interested and happen to be there some time. Just drop me a
note.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
Paul Schilliger , May 10, 2002; 02:08 p.m.
Thilo, a hundred reloads is much more than I ask! As for being in Basel, I live unfortunately on the opposite
side, near Geneva. But thanks for your kind thought!
Mike Rosenberg , May 15, 2002; 09:00 p.m.
All,
<p>
I have been using the cartridges extensively since October, reloading
them up to 30Xs! I have used graphmatic holders, and think these are
a huge advantage over those. very easy to use, and fairly robust.
You have to be careful putting the septums back in the cartridges -
they are a tight fit.
<p>
Badger started carrying them after I requested them back in the fall.
<p>
I was canyon country with them last week, and was able to carry more
film with half the weight of the graphmatics. In fact, I had bought
enough cartridges that I was able to load at home and not have to
bother loading in the field. I also used some of the Readyloads, and
liked them also, so future trips may be a mix of the two.
mark blackman , May 22, 2002; 09:49 a.m.
I'm afraid I dont share some people's enthusiasm for the quickchange
system. I bought a holder and 2 catridges a couple of weeks ago from
Robert White in the UK. The first time I re-loaded (making sure
the 'end-cap' which you remove to empty it was firmly in place), This
end-cap stayed behind in the holder when I removed the cartridge and
left me with 8 sheets of fogged film.
<p>
I reloaded, taking extra care to ensure everything was firmly in
place. When these 8 sheets were processed, all had varying light
leaks.
<p>
I could just have a bad cartridge, I have another one that I will re-
load with some FP4 and develop at home, just to check out of thats ok.
Hisun Wong , May 23, 2002; 08:41 p.m.
Mark, I have 10 cassettes and have been using QuickChange for 3 years
now. I never had any problem. I don't use Readyload TMAX anymore
because Readyload is expensive and only TMAX is available. QuickChange
holder and its cassette are well built.
<p>
Regards
Hisun
Hong Kong