Learn why it is important to calibrate and how the new Spyder5 can help you ensure that your images are being developed to their truest color profiles so you can see, share, and print pictures just as...
If you are reading this, you already know photography is an expensive hobby.
We spend thousands of dollars on the equipment we need for capturing the light at
that decisive moment. But you can get started at this nature photography habit
without selling your car. Most people start with a simple 35mm rig, then build a
few lenses and accessories around whichever system they have chosen. See
"What Camera Should I Buy?" on this forum
for more information.
So how do you get started on the cheap? Check out the photo.net classifieds or
other web sites. One good source of information, which I discovered through
photo.net, is the
Digest. Reading the postings of people who used Yashica Mat 124G cameras
prompted me to add this to my short list of necessary equipment.
I wanted a larger original than my Canon EOS system gave me, but could not
afford to lay out several thousand dollars for a Bronica, Hassleblad, Pentax or
Rollei. When I found an excellent Yashica Mat at Adolph Gasser's in San Francisco
a few months ago I decided to take the plunge. One roll of Ektachrome 100SW later
I was hooked. But this was just a test roll shot in a local park, to make sure
the shutter speeds and apertures were working. The true test would come two weeks
later on a trip to the Sierra Nevada Mountains.
In the Field
Still being uncomfortable spending the money for slide film for such an old
camera, I brought the EOS along to shoot Ektachrome and loaded the Yashica Mat
with Kodak Ektar 25. My son and I spent a long weekend near Kennedy Meadow,
taking scenic photos along Highway 108, where it parallels Deadman Creek, and up
to Sonora Pass. Looking down at the ground glass, and interpreting a reversed
image, helped me concentrate more on composition than I did when peering through
the tiny viewfinder of my Elan II. The Yashica Mat does not have a bright
viewfinder image, especially when compared with a Rollei TLR, but I found that by
flipping up the magnifier I could easily compose and focus even in low light.
I shot one entire roll using some rocks in the foreground to test the corner
sharpness, with water rushing over rocks in the middle and upper portions of the
image for visual impact. When I went to the lab a few days later I was pleased to
see the rocks in the lower corners were indeed sharp. And the complete lack of
grain and added tonal scale made 35mm enlargements look, well, grainy and
The next test came on a trip to the Bristlecone Pine National Forest, just
north of Death Valley in California's White Mountains, and Great Basin National
Park in eastern Nevada. I carried both systems again, but this time brought slide
film for the Yashica Mat and Kodak Royal Gold 25 for the Canon. The slides were a
mixture of Fujichrome Velvia, and Agfachrome RSX 50, 100 and 200. A friend who
shoots fashion photography sent me six rolls of the Agfachrome to test. You gotta
love being someone else's guinea pig.
I followed my usual procedure on this trip, dragging my son around all
afternoon, searching for interesting scenes and checking my compass to make sure
the morning light would shine on the particular tree I spied. When my alarm went
off at 4 a.m., I crawled out of my sleeping into the cold morning, left my son
sleeping in his tent and drove back to the target tree to wait for sunrise.
Because I hadn't bought a light meter, I used to Elan II to meter the light,
mounted the Yashica Mat on my tripod and shot a few frames at first light, then
mounted the Elan II and shot a few more frames, just in case. I waited a bit for
stronger light, but another tree started casting a shadow on my tree of choice,
so I moved in closer and took some close-up shots on the twisted tree trunk.
These came out especially well.
By the way, the Yashica Mat 124G does have a light meter. However, I have
found the meter in the Canon EOS Elan II is extremely accurate, and the meter in
my Yashica Mat reads two stops slower than the Elan II meter. Using the Elan II
as a light meter is tedious unless I have both cameras loaded with the same speed
film, but it does work very well when I keep my mind on what I'm doing. That is
not always easy with an 11-year-old along asking me to check the framing in his
Konica point and shoot all the time.
It Ain't the Toys, It's How You Play with Them
After a few days in the Bristlecone Pine Forest, we headed east across Nevada
to Great Basin National Park. (Tip: get there in the fall after the aspens have
changed color. I plan to go back.) Four days in Great Basin yielded excellent
shots with both systems, but a few with the Yashica turned out just as I had
My son decided to accompany me on one early morning shoot the second day in
Great Basin. We hiked up to Teresa Lake before sunrise, and waited. Snow-covered
Wheeler Peak reflected in the almost calm water, ruffled only by a slight breeze.
I shot a few 28mm frames with the Canon so I could get the reflection and the
peak on the negative, then switched to the Yashica Mat. The 80mm lens couldn't
get the whole scene in the viewfinder, so I moved a little closer, focused on
rocks under the water and stopped down to f/32 to get the reflection sharp. These
are some of the best shots of the trip. Sometimes having limited equipment forces
you to look for different perspectives. Limitation or advantage? Depends on your
Upon returning to California Monday afternoon, weather prevented us from our
planned backpacking excursion into the Ansel Adams Wilderness south of Yosemite
National Park. (We were not prepared for snow in July.), so we headed back to the
Bristlecone Pine National Forest. The snow in the Sierras turned to rain 30 miles
across the Owens Valley in the White Mountains. We grabbed what little sun there
was to try and capture the wet bristlecone pines, but there wasn't enough light
to get many images. On Thursday the clouds broke, and we got some excellent shots
with beautiful, fluffy clouds in the sky. Again, I shot both systems on almost
Because Bay 1 filters are hard to find these days, I held a circular polarizer
over the Yashica Mat's taking lens, making sure to orient it the same way as the
polarizer over the Canon lens, so my light reading would be similar. How did this
work? Quite well. The only difficulty came from trying to remember to calculate
the differences between the film speeds in the Canon and the Yashica Mat, and the
three frames I blew when I metered with the polarizer on the Canon and forgot to
put the polarizer over the Yashica Mat. That's why I have a used light meter on
the way. Oh well, at least it wasn't 4x5 film.
Comparisons and Conclusions
How do the images compare? The Yashica Mat seems to be as sharp and contrasty
as the Canon 50/1.8 prime lens, and noticeably sharper than the Tamron 28-200
zoom my wife insisted I buy. These aren't scientific measurements (I'll leave
that to Bob, if he ever wants to do some), but impressions gained from comparing
slides through an 8x loupe. The larger original image size is a decided advantage
when enlarging, but the Canon is much more versatile with its excellent range of
Looking over the images after returning home, I concluded the image quality in
medium format is definitely better than 35mm. And in some instances not being
able to change lenses made me think more about how to shoot a scene, and I got
better photos than I would have with interchangeable lenses. In other instances,
putting a wider or longer lens on the Canon allowed me to change the perspective
to a more pleasing composition.
This is all part of the process of learning to shoot landscapes, and gives me
more motivation to buy a medium format or large format system with
interchangeable lenses, give the Canon and the Tamron to my wife and let my son
have the Yashica Mat. First, though, I'm getting a good, used light meter. The
Yashica Mat gave me some very good slides in both locations, including some
beautiful evening images of Wheeler Peak above Stella Lake in Great Basin. Close
ups of the bristlecone pines show much more detail in the larger format. But the
best image of the trip came out of the Canon, using that cheap zoom at its 28mm
setting. It's one I shot the first day, of a lone bristlecone pine against some
red clouds at first light, with the snow-covered Sierra Nevadas in the
The Yashica Mat hasn't been perfect. I started having problems with it during
the trip.About every other roll the camera would not advance past the first frame
until I double exposed that frame, the it would behave. Gasser's has the camera
in their shop as I write this, repairing it under their 90-day used equipment
warranty. I'll update this article after they return the camera.
Overall, though, this is a good entry-level medium format setup. With a little
research and patience, you can find an excellent Yashica Mat 124G for $150 to
$300, a light meter for $50 or so (unless you want to go ahead a get a new one),
and a used tripod for $50. Total investment, for me, is about $400 including the
camera, light meter and tripod. This will get me by until I can start building a
better system. It's cheap, the image quality is very good, and the weight is