A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Leica and Rangefinders > Leica R > Suggestion about Elmarit R...

Featured Equipment Deals

Three Tips for Selling/Showing Your Photos in a Gallery Read More

Three Tips for Selling/Showing Your Photos in a Gallery

There are few industries as heart-wrenching as the fine art business. It's a six-car pileup at the intersection of art and commerce and the amount of opinion and hyperbole that is somehow labeled as...

Latest Equipment Articles

The Week in Photography News Read More

The Week in Photography News

February 21-27, 2015: Hear the latest goings-on in the photography world, from product releases to event and campaign announcements and more.

Latest Learning Articles

Teaching with the Nikon School: An Interview with Photographer and Instructor Reed Hoffman Read More

Teaching with the Nikon School: An Interview with Photographer and Instructor Reed Hoffman

An instructor with the Nikon School since 2002, Reed Hoffman speaks with photo.net about his love for both photography and teaching, and what makes the Nikon School a valuable resource for...


Suggestion about Elmarit R 135/2.8

paolo folzani , Jun 27, 2002; 01:25 p.m.

Dear boys, I've found an Elmarit R 135/2.8 Wetzlar in good conditions (n. 2,305,...). I'd like to own a 135mm lens because is very versatile for portraits and not so heavy us the 180. What do You think about this Leica lens (made in 1968)? And what would be his worth? Thank You very much for the answer. Paolo

Responses

John Collier , Jun 27, 2002; 01:51 p.m.

http://www.wildlightphoto.com/leica/

Tim Franklin , Jun 27, 2002; 04:45 p.m.

Most important Paolo, does this lens have the right cams for your R body?

greg mason , Jun 27, 2002; 04:53 p.m.

paolo:

i use the 180mm f4 elmar instead it is small and very light. i felt that the 135mm was too close to my 90/

Gil Pruitt , Jun 27, 2002; 05:21 p.m.

Hi Paolo, I have the 90 2.8, the 135 2.8 and the 180 4.0. The 135 seems to have gone out of favor so they can be had relatively inexpensively. Also the 135 is fairly heavy. I think it is a very good lens and like the results from it which are sharp, contrasty and very representative of Leica glass. I would try to hold out for a 3-cam version with the E55 filter size, the later the better. I like it best on a tripod and even got an adapter so I could use it on my eos bodies. I probably carry the 90/180 combo more often. Good luck.

Marco Hidalgo , Jun 27, 2002; 08:15 p.m.

Paolo: I own an elmarit R 135 f 2.8 very late version early 90's. with a very useful 55mm. filter thread. The lens is sharp enough but not as sharp as the 90mm or the 180 apo f3.4. The colour it renders is very pleasant as well as bokeh. 135mm. for me was a good combination when using a 60mm macro. as the 90 was too close and the 180 way too long. But, on the other hand the lens is very heavy . I only feel comfortable using with the camera on a tripod, not the case of a 90 mm. or the very light 180 f4 , you may consider this depending on your style of photography. All in all a very nice lens and can be found at very good prices. Marco.

Back to top

Notify me of Responses