A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Leica and Rangefinders > Leica Thread Mount > taylor hobson ental II ltm...

Featured Equipment Deals

Introduction to Lightroom Tabs: Develop (Video Tutorial) Read More

Introduction to Lightroom Tabs: Develop (Video Tutorial)

Learn how to use the Lightroom Develop Tab to ensure your image is just as you want it to be, including presents, tone curve, lens correction, and more!

Latest Equipment Articles

The Week in Photography News Read More

The Week in Photography News

March 28 - April 3, 2015: Hear the latest goings-on in the photography world, from product releases to event and campaign announcements and more.

Latest Learning Articles

Understanding RAW vs. JPEG File Types (Video Tutorial) Read More

Understanding RAW vs. JPEG File Types (Video Tutorial)

One of the advantages of your DSLR camera is its ability to shoot in multiple file types, such as JPEG and RAW. This video tutorial will demonstrate the differences and show you the benefits of...


taylor hobson ental II ltm lenses

Peter Chiappini , Nov 15, 2003; 08:39 p.m.

Hello, I was wondering how these lenses perform compared to some other ltm lenses. I just purchased a 2 inch. f/3.5 Taylor-Hobson Ental II lens and I am considering a 3.25 inch f/4 Taylor-Hobson Ental II lens; both cost about 20$. Any info would be appreciated thank you, Peter

Responses


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Rob F. , Nov 15, 2003; 09:46 p.m.

Twenty bucks? Go for it!

Al Kaplan - Miami, FL , Nov 15, 2003; 10:47 p.m.

For twenty bucks the worst you could end up with is a pair of decent quality magnifying glasses for examining slides, negs and contact sheets. They were a respected British lens manufacturer.

Steve Barnett , Nov 16, 2003; 07:00 a.m.

Definitely go for it at $20! The Reid cameras these lenses were meant for were by all accounts better made than the original Leica design they are copied from. And likewise I understand some of the lenses beat the Leica equivalent for image quality, although I couldn't tell you which ones. Either way at $20 it has to be a no-brainer.

Christopher Chen , Nov 16, 2003; 01:23 p.m.

The Taylor, Taylor & Hobson 2-inch f/2 Cooke Amotal for the Bell & Howell Foton (sometimes found converted to LTM) is an excellent lens. TT&H still make some of the finest cinema lenses in the world. For $20 a piece, I would buy both lenses!

Alex Lofquist , Nov 16, 2003; 03:28 p.m.

Note on THC.

Taylor, Taylor and Hobson (later Taylor, Hobson, Cooke) designed some of the first large aperture lenses used on 35mm cameras. The Leica 50mm f/1.5 Summarit was built under license from THC, as I believe were other Leitz lenses. THC was acquired by Rank Industries (J. Arthur Rank) in the UK, and later to be peeled-off as a separate entity. I haven't heard much about them in the last few years.

Steve Barnett , Nov 17, 2003; 03:44 a.m.

Cooke are currently considering a new range of LTM lenses.......

Jonathan Reynolds , Nov 17, 2003; 04:32 a.m.

I recall reading somewhere that Zeiss bought an important Taylor Hobson patent, and that this led to early Contax lenses outperforming Leica lenses for a while. Sorry this is rather vague, but I no longer have the book. Be interested to know if anyone can confirm this, however.

Dan Fromm , Nov 17, 2003; 03:42 p.m.

Um, Entals are enlarging lenses. They don't have focusing mounts. Are you sure you can use your lenses on a camera?

Cheers,

Dan

Peter Chiappini , Dec 18, 2003; 01:50 a.m.

haha, I got the lenses and Dan is right! They do look very sharp and they have a nice coating, but I don't even have an enlarger.


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses