A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Leica and Rangefinders > Leica Thread Mount > taylor hobson ental II ltm...

Featured Equipment Deals

How to Choose Studio Lighting Read More

How to Choose Studio Lighting

Read Garry Edwards' advice on proper studio lighting equipment on photo.net. He covers all the bases, including how to choose the right lighting kit and what the three basic studio lighting options...

Latest Equipment Articles

10 Stocking Stuffers under $50 Read More

10 Stocking Stuffers under $50

We've searched high and low to put together this list of 10 small photo-related gifts that any photography lover would be delighted to receive. No matter your budget, these are also fun to give (or...

Latest Learning Articles

State of the ART: The Little Lens That Could Read More

State of the ART: The Little Lens That Could

Fine art photographer Pete Myers talks about his love for the Cosina Voigtländer CV ULTRON 40mm SLii, a lens he considers to be "The Little Lens That Could."


taylor hobson ental II ltm lenses

Peter Chiappini , Nov 15, 2003; 08:39 p.m.

Hello, I was wondering how these lenses perform compared to some other ltm lenses. I just purchased a 2 inch. f/3.5 Taylor-Hobson Ental II lens and I am considering a 3.25 inch f/4 Taylor-Hobson Ental II lens; both cost about 20$. Any info would be appreciated thank you, Peter

Responses


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Rob F. , Nov 15, 2003; 09:46 p.m.

Twenty bucks? Go for it!

Al Kaplan - Miami, FL , Nov 15, 2003; 10:47 p.m.

For twenty bucks the worst you could end up with is a pair of decent quality magnifying glasses for examining slides, negs and contact sheets. They were a respected British lens manufacturer.

Steve Barnett , Nov 16, 2003; 07:00 a.m.

Definitely go for it at $20! The Reid cameras these lenses were meant for were by all accounts better made than the original Leica design they are copied from. And likewise I understand some of the lenses beat the Leica equivalent for image quality, although I couldn't tell you which ones. Either way at $20 it has to be a no-brainer.

Christopher Chen , Nov 16, 2003; 01:23 p.m.

The Taylor, Taylor & Hobson 2-inch f/2 Cooke Amotal for the Bell & Howell Foton (sometimes found converted to LTM) is an excellent lens. TT&H still make some of the finest cinema lenses in the world. For $20 a piece, I would buy both lenses!

Alex Lofquist , Nov 16, 2003; 03:28 p.m.

Note on THC.

Taylor, Taylor and Hobson (later Taylor, Hobson, Cooke) designed some of the first large aperture lenses used on 35mm cameras. The Leica 50mm f/1.5 Summarit was built under license from THC, as I believe were other Leitz lenses. THC was acquired by Rank Industries (J. Arthur Rank) in the UK, and later to be peeled-off as a separate entity. I haven't heard much about them in the last few years.

Steve Barnett , Nov 17, 2003; 03:44 a.m.

Cooke are currently considering a new range of LTM lenses.......

Jonathan Reynolds , Nov 17, 2003; 04:32 a.m.

I recall reading somewhere that Zeiss bought an important Taylor Hobson patent, and that this led to early Contax lenses outperforming Leica lenses for a while. Sorry this is rather vague, but I no longer have the book. Be interested to know if anyone can confirm this, however.

Dan Fromm , Nov 17, 2003; 03:42 p.m.

Um, Entals are enlarging lenses. They don't have focusing mounts. Are you sure you can use your lenses on a camera?

Cheers,

Dan

Peter Chiappini , Dec 18, 2003; 01:50 a.m.

haha, I got the lenses and Dan is right! They do look very sharp and they have a nice coating, but I don't even have an enlarger.


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses