A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Leica and Rangefinders > Leica Thread Mount > taylor hobson ental II ltm...

Featured Equipment Deals

Getting Started in Video Read More

Getting Started in Video

Photographer Ted Kawalerski made the transition from still to motion and has never looked back. Ted takes you through the steps to get started in a medium that will open your photography business to...

Latest Equipment Articles

Sony a6300-First Impressions Read More

Sony a6300-First Impressions

When Sony's invitation to spend a couple of days shooting with the new a6300 in Miami arrived via email, I didn't have to think twice before sending my RSVP. Announced in February and shipping this...

Latest Learning Articles

Macro Photography Slideshow Read More

Macro Photography Slideshow

*These are some of the highlights from our recent Macro Photography Contest!* Click the arrow to begin the slideshow. h1. William Banik "Bayou...


taylor hobson ental II ltm lenses

Peter Chiappini , Nov 15, 2003; 08:39 p.m.

Hello, I was wondering how these lenses perform compared to some other ltm lenses. I just purchased a 2 inch. f/3.5 Taylor-Hobson Ental II lens and I am considering a 3.25 inch f/4 Taylor-Hobson Ental II lens; both cost about 20$. Any info would be appreciated thank you, Peter

Responses


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Rob F. , Nov 15, 2003; 09:46 p.m.

Twenty bucks? Go for it!

Al Kaplan - Miami, FL , Nov 15, 2003; 10:47 p.m.

For twenty bucks the worst you could end up with is a pair of decent quality magnifying glasses for examining slides, negs and contact sheets. They were a respected British lens manufacturer.

Steve Barnett , Nov 16, 2003; 07:00 a.m.

Definitely go for it at $20! The Reid cameras these lenses were meant for were by all accounts better made than the original Leica design they are copied from. And likewise I understand some of the lenses beat the Leica equivalent for image quality, although I couldn't tell you which ones. Either way at $20 it has to be a no-brainer.

Christopher Chen , Nov 16, 2003; 01:23 p.m.

The Taylor, Taylor & Hobson 2-inch f/2 Cooke Amotal for the Bell & Howell Foton (sometimes found converted to LTM) is an excellent lens. TT&H still make some of the finest cinema lenses in the world. For $20 a piece, I would buy both lenses!

Alex Lofquist , Nov 16, 2003; 03:28 p.m.

Note on THC.

Taylor, Taylor and Hobson (later Taylor, Hobson, Cooke) designed some of the first large aperture lenses used on 35mm cameras. The Leica 50mm f/1.5 Summarit was built under license from THC, as I believe were other Leitz lenses. THC was acquired by Rank Industries (J. Arthur Rank) in the UK, and later to be peeled-off as a separate entity. I haven't heard much about them in the last few years.

Steve Barnett , Nov 17, 2003; 03:44 a.m.

Cooke are currently considering a new range of LTM lenses.......

Jonathan Reynolds , Nov 17, 2003; 04:32 a.m.

I recall reading somewhere that Zeiss bought an important Taylor Hobson patent, and that this led to early Contax lenses outperforming Leica lenses for a while. Sorry this is rather vague, but I no longer have the book. Be interested to know if anyone can confirm this, however.

Dan Fromm , Nov 17, 2003; 03:42 p.m.

Um, Entals are enlarging lenses. They don't have focusing mounts. Are you sure you can use your lenses on a camera?

Cheers,

Dan

Peter Chiappini , Dec 18, 2003; 01:50 a.m.

haha, I got the lenses and Dan is right! They do look very sharp and they have a nice coating, but I don't even have an enlarger.


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses