Welcome to Photo.net: A Community of Photographers

Community > Forums > Leica and Rangefinders > Leica M > Leica CL Photo Cell Mystery

Leica CL Photo Cell Mystery

Marc Lieberman , Jul 14, 2005; 01:17 a.m.

I recently purchased a recently CLA'd Leica CL. The seller's Leica tech who performed the CLA says that he replaced the meter. The bill for the CLA was about $180.

My own Leica tech (Steve Choi)tells me that the meter may have been adjusted during the CLA, but that it could not have been replaced, because the coil pattern on the photo cell was the "old-style" that has not been made in a very long time. He says that new photo cells used as replacements on CL's have a different coil patterns and are more sensitive than the older cells. Pictures of the photo cell on the camera I purchased and of the "new version" of the photo cell (from another camera) are posted below. Steve tells me that his cost for a new cell is about $170.

The seller points out that the photo cell on the camera he sent me is very clean and that the white parts of the cell have not yellowed. He suggests that the cell has to be new or it would have turned yellow by now.

I know that if they are working at all, the old light meters on CL's are notoriously unreliable and prone to pooping out. That is why I was happy to find a camera advertized to have a new meter still under warranty.

So here are my questions:

1. Can one tell definitively whether the photo cell on a CL has been recently replaced by looking at the coil pattern? Or is the fact that a photo cell has not yet yellowed a good indicator of whether it was recently replaced. Is it likely that a qualified Leica tech would both perform a CLA and replace the light meter on a CL for $180?

2. Am I wrong to put so much emphasis on whether the light meter in the camera is new, or is the type of adjustment that would come with a competent CLA just as good?


This is the photo cell on the camera I purchased.

Responses


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Marc Lieberman , Jul 14, 2005; 01:20 a.m.

This is an example of what Steve Choi says is a new photo cell that he uses as the replacement on CL.


This a new photo cell according to Steve Choi

Frank Granovski , Jul 14, 2005; 01:58 a.m.

Re: #2.

Why are you worrying about this?? You could have worse problems like those dork bars I have. Anyway, I just bought my packaging supplies from Office Depot so now I can send my sick CL to Sherry tomorrow.

Marc Lieberman , Jul 14, 2005; 02:04 a.m.

Frank-

I just scanned a roll taken with my Norita, and it was afflicted with nasty dork bars. Maybe you damn dork bar posts are infectous.

Marc Lieberman , Jul 14, 2005; 02:06 a.m.

One more thing, Frank. I'm sure my seller is reading this thread right now, rolling his eyes and wondering the same thing you are. ;-)

Frank Granovski , Jul 14, 2005; 03:17 a.m.

From the very beginning I had those bars---my first Leica; and after getting it fixed twice, I was driven over the edge. Our peanut gallery didn't help. Well, some did.

About the CL's photo cell, I don't think it matters if you have a new one or an old one or a old new one (old stock). The CL's meter is going to be flaky no matter what. It's no ELECTRO GSN, after all, even though they were both introduced in 1973.

Andy Aitken , Jul 14, 2005; 05:10 a.m.

Marc, if it's any help my CL cell looks exactly like the 1st picture, isn't yellow at all and is still working fine after 32 years (even though the rest of the camera is pretty battered and has other minor problems).

Alan Wilder , Jul 14, 2005; 07:26 a.m.

Marc, why not send the pictures via email to Dave Ellwell(?) @ Leica in Northvale, NJ? I'm sure he can give you the scoop on the cell.

Ben Z , Jul 14, 2005; 09:13 a.m.

Him, or to DAG dagcam (at) chorus (dot) net. I've never seen any CL cell except for the first one. Perhaps the established repair guys have some stock of them but others like your repair guy have to get them from another source and adapt them. Either way, I once spoke with DAG and he said the cells really don't go bad all that often, most of the time they can be adjusted. Sherry from most of the reports I've heard seems mostly to say they have to be replaced. Given the cost of the cell (over $100) I'd be inclined to give DAG a shot at adjusting it. Worst-case scenario he can replace the cell for the same cost as her. According to him, the main problem in the CL meter is some kind of linkage between the shutter/ISO wheel and the meter itself that refuses to stay adjusted.

Jeremy Tok , Jul 14, 2005; 09:17 a.m.

http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00C1kg


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses