A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Leica and Rangefinders > Praise for 50 pre-asph...

Featured Equipment Deals

Latest Equipment Articles

4 Outdoor & Adventure Photo Packs Read More

4 Outdoor & Adventure Photo Packs

Photo packs have come a long way in the past decade, especially those that are targeted toward outdoor and adventure photographers. Alaska-based adventure photographer Dan Bailey takes a closer look...

Latest Learning Articles

A Brief History of Photography - Part II (Video Tutorial) Read More

A Brief History of Photography - Part II (Video Tutorial)

This video explores the second half of photography's history and development from the technological advances in the late 1800s through the beginnings of digital photography at the end of the 20th...


Praise for 50 pre-asph summilux M

seb v. , Feb 07, 2006; 04:06 p.m.

I am going through the last 2 years worth of prints I have, about 2000 odd, and most of them were shot with a 50mm summilux pre asph. I have to say that I find the character of this lens very beautiful. It's plenty sharp enough but it also has an ethereal quality wide open. Colours are beautiful and the B&W has lovely tones, not really contasty but very pleasing to the eye - I have lots of stuff from Scotland where the light can be stunning and it is all captured perfectly. I have since got a Noctilux and was thinking of getting the ASPH 50 but sorry guys, I've seen the ASPH 50 shots and IMO they have bred any character right out of itヨa great scientific achievement, granted, but too clinical for my tastes. Anyway, just thought I'd mention it. After the ASPH came out the prices of these lenses have dropped so it's probably a bit of a bargain too.

Responses


    1   |   2     Next    Last

craig h , Feb 07, 2006; 04:31 p.m.

I never had any problem with the image quality from my old Summilux 50. I recall Jay being quite toxic about its performance. It's no Summicron in terms of contrast but I always found it produced sweet results.

and I tend to agree with you re the ASPH, seb.

C

Eric Kim , Feb 07, 2006; 05:00 p.m.

I experienced white glares with it few times when I pictured people with Tri-X in the lighted indoor nearby slightly shiny objects such as window, or kitchen sink. Those objects are only things I can blame for the glare. I never had such problem with pre-asph summicron 35mm. Other than that, I love to use it for portrait for its smooth tonality and pleasing ambience

Jeff . , Feb 07, 2006; 07:14 p.m.

I agree with you, seb. It's a great lens. I sold it a while ago to get a 75mm Summilux. I was happy with my 50 lux so I don't really know why I did it. I guess I like buying and selling (and buying back again) =).

BTW, I like how my 75 lux perform too.

Jeff

Jerry Lehrer , Feb 07, 2006; 07:54 p.m.

Seb,

When I was given a 50 pre-Asph Summilux, I was so impressed that it is now my ONLY 50mm lens! I have used every version of the 50 Summicron except the Aspheric (Is there one?) and have not been impressed at all.

Mike H (Melbourne Australia) , Feb 07, 2006; 10:49 p.m.

I agree with this being a great lens and in particular the lovely tones. I shot a roll of HP5 pushed to 3200 the other night taking some shots of my son's band. Mid roll I changed from the pre-Asph 50 'lux to a 21mm Elmarit Asph. The difference was stunning. The Asph lens really pushed up the already considerable contrast. It was like chalk and cheese. Contrast is all very well, but sometimes it's too much of a good thing. It seems to me that the Asph lenses, as a family, are more contrasty than the older non-Asph lenses as a family.

Regards

Mike

feli , Feb 07, 2006; 11:02 p.m.

Same here, I'm very fond of the pre-ASPH Lux. I have a fairly new one, which must have come from one of the last batches made, before the APSH model appeared. The Lux has a very classic signature, which is a lot smoother and richer than other 1.4 lenses I've shot. In the bokeh department it just can't be beat.

Performance wise I place it between the Summircon DR and the current Cron, but it has far better flare resistance than either, yet it still manages to 'glow'.

My only complaint is the collapsible hood, which can't be locked in to place. I solved this problem by using a hood from a Contax G2 lens.

Great lens, a true classic in the Leica lineup.

Kevin Mendenhall , Feb 08, 2006; 09:45 a.m.

Ditto. I sold the lens, then bought another one later. f1.4 is a bit 'wiggy' at short distances, but other than that, I find it much more versatile than the Summicron. f1.7 to f4.0 is such a sweet spot, I often have an ND filter on the lens. Lower contrast than the Summicron, but a benefit to that is that you can shoot a punchier film and still get great skin tones. I can get away with Portra UC instead of NPH, and I would never do that with the Summicron.

Tony Senzaorbi , Feb 08, 2006; 11:38 a.m.

"After the ASPH came out the prices of these lenses have dropped so it's probably a bit of a bargain too"

I've always used 35 and 90 with the Leica, never bothered with a 50, but I've been contemplating getting a 50 lately so as to carry one body and avoid lens changing. The different versions of the Summicron and their supporters and detractors have my head spinning, but Summilux prices (especially the 43mm model)are getting closer to Cron territory so I'm starting to think, why not have the extra stop? (My 35 and 90 are Crons). As for the new Summilux, well, maybe if I won the lottery!

Robert Haller , Feb 08, 2006; 03:41 p.m.

indeed - the 50lux for me is the mother of all current lenses - the other lenghts like 75, 24 and as well 35 are nice to experiment and use for special occasions...

In my case, I use the 50lux black paint on a bp-MP which is a dream - the lens has a large bright eye but does not nerve with weight, size or anything else - ok the built in sun-blend does not really protect the lens when you bump into a door ...


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses