A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Leica and Rangefinders > My Next Lens > Wideness of the 28 2.8 Elmar...

Featured Equipment Deals

The August Monthly Project Read More

The August Monthly Project

For August's monthly project, Tom Persinger is joining us again to explore the various ways of using texture to evoke tactile qualities in our photographs. Please add your photo to the thread and...

Latest Equipment Articles

Choosing a Mobile Photo Printer Read More

Choosing a Mobile Photo Printer

In today's mobile, digital world, we carry hundreds or even thousands of pictures around on our smartphones and tablets. Tom Persinger looks at 4 different mobile photo printer options for getting...

Latest Learning Articles

Advanced Printing with Lightroom (Video Tutorial) Read More

Advanced Printing with Lightroom (Video Tutorial)

Building upon last week's Basic Printing with Lightroom video tutorial, this advanced printing tutorial will teach you to print contact sheets, print multiple images at a time, use Lightroom's present...


Wideness of the 28 2.8 Elmar ?

Leon Chang , Jul 03, 2006; 03:40 p.m.

When shooting cityscapes I often find my Elmar 50 2.8 too narrow. I was thinking of getting a 28 f2.8 Elmar. Can anyone post some samples of how "wide" it looks in practice. I often like to emphasize foregrounds, which is rather hard with a 50 mm. thnx!

Responses


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Chris Sullivan , Jul 03, 2006; 04:09 p.m.

I shoot with a 28mm 2.8 Elmarit which I used for the majority of my last trip to Europe. It's plenty wide and doesn't offer up too much distortion for the landscapes.


St. Tropez, France-leica M6, 28mm/2.8 elmarit

Paul A. - Los Angeles, CA. , Jul 03, 2006; 04:20 p.m.

The 28 Elmarit is great, but if I had purcahse another 28mm I'd go for the Cron.

Adrian Bastin , Jul 03, 2006; 04:28 p.m.

Leon, you mean Elmarit ?

Eliot Rosen , Jul 03, 2006; 04:35 p.m.

The 28 mm lens has about a 76 degree diagonal angle of view, compared with about 45 degrees for a 50 mm lens. That is a significant difference.

Jerry Lehrer , Jul 03, 2006; 04:36 p.m.

Chris,-- What is causing all that vignetting in your photo? I know it is not the lens itself. Could you have put the wrong lenshood on?

Ronald Moravec , Jul 03, 2006; 05:23 p.m.

A 25 would be twice as wide as your 50, both width and length. 4 x the area covered.

28 a bit less.

Paul Neuthaler , Jul 03, 2006; 06:01 p.m.

Along with your 50 Summicron, take a look at the 28mm 1:3.5 V/C Color Skopar -- inexpensive, excellent build quality, sharp!

Fred C , Jul 03, 2006; 08:09 p.m.

When fully open, the Elmarit has about 2 stops of light-falloff at 21.6mm from the centre of the frame, and even more at the extreme corners. Chris' photo must have been taken at a wide aperture.

Andy Piper , Jul 03, 2006; 08:16 p.m.

Leon: Another 28mm Elmarit picture:

http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=380526


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses