A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Leica and Rangefinders > Leica R > Leica R lens to Nikon DSLR...

Leica R lens to Nikon DSLR adapter

Avishek Aiyar , Jul 29, 2009; 11:25 p.m.

I am new to this forum.I am interested in purchasing a Leica Elmarit 90mm lens that I can possibly "doctor" to fit into my Nikon D60.
I saw some instructions on http://www.leitax.com/conversion/leica/elmarit-90/index.html, but the adapter available there is very expensive. I saw a cheaper Chinese adapter for Leica R lenses to Nikon DSLRs.
Can that be used in place of the Leitax adapter, but I follow of the rest of the instructions for doctoring the lens.
From the pictures I saw, as long as there are 6 holes (for the corresponding six screws that go into the Leica 3 cam R lens), I should be fine...right?
Any advice would be appreciated.


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Vivek . , Jul 30, 2009; 05:26 a.m.

Two things to consider:
1. Buy a D200/300 class nikon body that will meter with manual focus lenses or switch to Canon, etc.
2. The Leitax adapter is the one to consider for F mount. There are no other equivalents.
(again, if you switch from Nikon to Canon, Pentax, etc., then you do not need this conversion and use adapters and get metring).

There is nothing special about Nikon, so, I would strongly suggest that you dump it and get a more versatile brand.

Gus Lazzari , Jul 30, 2009; 06:43 a.m.

Vivek is correct; a Canon DSLR will be the smarter play. The more liberal sensor plane distance allows for a simple adapter which is attached to the Leica R lens (Some have focus assist contacts!) and you're taking Leica lens digital images! Don't mess with the valuable Leica lens...

Though more expensive than you'd probably like, the optimum Canon body in the used market would be a 5D. (Full frame sensor)

Avishek Aiyar , Jul 30, 2009; 08:06 a.m.

Thanks guys.......
Well.....I am stuck with a D60 for now.......thanks to my student status I cannot afford another pody.....but I definitely plan to get another body later on..........which Pentax body would you recommend and whats the mount on it?I am looking at different lenses from Leica, Hasselblad, Carl Zeiss......which body is the most versatile to fit all these lenses and more?
About the adapter....I saw this cheap adapter for $42 on ebay.....I am going to try that first....if that does not work, I can always return it and get the Leitax one.......my main issue is the Leitax adapter alone comes for $112!

Richard Williams , Jul 30, 2009; 02:53 p.m.

Pentax/Sony has the same problem as Nikon - with a simple adapter fitted you can't get the Leica lens elements close enough to the film plane to retain infinity focus. There are only two solutions to this - completely replace the Leica bayonet with a Nikon or Pentax bayonet (what Leitax does), or buy an adapter that contains a glass element that restores infinity focus. The second option will degrade the image quality - whether this is significant is something you'd have to determine by experiment.

Everything is much simpler with a Canon body, for which simple adapters can be designed (without glass elements) that retain infinity focus and leave the lens unaltered (these are readily available on ebay). Canon's other advantage is that even the cheap bodies will allow (stop down) metering with adapted lenses (your D60 won't do this even with Leitax, though a D200/D300/D700/D3 etc would).

Is there any particular reason why you want the Elmarit? There's a legendary Nikon manual focus lens with a focal length not much greater, the 105 f/2.5! Still no metering with the D60, however (this is true of all nearly all manual focus lenses, with the exception of a handful of 'AI-P' lenses).

Avishek Aiyar , Jul 30, 2009; 04:15 p.m.


Thanks a lot for info. I figured that I would need to do some hacking and remove the cams from the Leica lenses to get it closer to the Nikon film plane. I am still thinking about the purchase.
Anyways, you raised an excellent question about why I am interested in the Elmarit.....I actually have the beautiful 105 f4 micro nikkor.
To be honest, I am interested in the Elmarit (and the Carl Zeiss Jena, Sonnar....) just to add to my collection.....I love vintage, antique stuff and I have a real fascination for stuff back from the dark ages. So, from a photography point of view I don't really have a defense, especially since I am pretty new to photography.

Richard Williams , Jul 30, 2009; 04:53 p.m.

For what it's worth, UK magazine Amateur Photographer tested one of the Nikon adapters with a glass element and got surprisingly good results (YMMV vary, of course, and an adapter from a diffferent source may not perform as well as the one they tested). You might also come across Nikon adapters without glass (intended only for close up work).

I suspect a 'home brew' Leitax-style conversion would be pretty tricky, but you could maybe get one of the custom adapter builders like SRB-Griturn or SK Grimes to fabricate something for you. If starting from scratch it might be easier to cannibalise and adapt a Nikon bayonet from a sacrificial lens (broken 3rd party zoom, perhaps) than an existing adapter (the face of the adapter meant to engage with the Leica lens wouldn't help you as you'd be removing the Leica bayonet anyway). But unless you're really handy with this sort of thing, the Leitax may start to look like a bargain :-)

Bill Blackwell , Jul 30, 2009; 07:33 p.m.

Look here:


I'm not so sure these "new" mounts allow for stop down metering, but the available adapters most certainly do not.

Richard Williams , Jul 30, 2009; 07:38 p.m.

The Leitax conversions do (see above) but only with a D200 or better.

Karim Ghantous , Jul 31, 2009; 12:44 a.m.

I disagree with Vivek. There is something special about Nikon (depending on your taste or application). Some wedding photographers won't touch Canon even though technically they are just as good (or better). It's all about how the image looks and a lot of people have good things to say about output from Nikons, even older models.

    1   |   2     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses