Martin Tai ![]()
![]()
, Jan 08, 1999; 01:39 p.m.
Many photographers, no matter what format they use, 8x11, 35mm, or medium format, when taking landscape photographs like to set camera lens on hyperfocal distance, to maximize depth of field.
But many photographers are not happy with the lack of sharpness of distant objects in their pictures; they feel these distant objects look too blurry in their pictures. Some try to stop down (for 35mm camera ), or double up the hyperfocal distance.
Harold Merklinger, in his book "THE INs and OUTs OF FOCUS"
presented an alternative depth of field theory, and provides a good alternative solution.
H.Merlinkger's analysis was based on object field instead of image field. His argument was that instead of looking at circle of confusion on the image plane, why not ask the question "what is the smallest resolvable object in the object plane "
In landscape or street photograph, accordingly to Merklinger, if you focus at hyperfocal point, the circle of confusion of distant object remains within preset limit, but the DISK OF CONFUSION grows rapidly without bound.
That explains why distant objects are fuzzy in the picture.
On the other hand, if the lens is focused at infinity, the disk of confusion is always equals to the diameter of
lens opening, which is DOC= focal_length/ fstop.
For example for 35mm lens, DOC= 4.4mm at F8, DOC= 3.2 mm
Disk of Confusion is the smallest diameter the lens can resolve
at a selected aperture.
One can choose how small the detail necessary in picture by simply looking
at the size of opening of the lens, and turning the aperture ring to dial in
the proper size.
For example if the thinnest tree twig has a diameter about 5 mm
then you pick F11 for your Minoxar lens, with DOC = 3.2 mm, then the
tree twig will be resolved in your picture. ( Up to 100 M, beyond that
the actual DOC will grow without limit again, due to diffraction)
Same for Minox 8x11 camera, which has a DOC = 15mm/3.5=4.3 mm.
When focus Minox 8x11 at infinity, any feature greater then 4.3 meter
will be resolved up to 30 meter (due to diffraction, which is a different
topic ).
In 35mm photography and Medium format circles, Merklinger has many followers (myself included ).
I apply his method to Minox ultramiature photography as well.
During travel, I simply set my Minox at infinty and shoot.
I don't remember
this topic ever came out at subminiature list discussions.
There are some discussion of Merklinger DOF theory at
USENET GROUP
and
Leica list
If disk of confusion governs the resolution of objects, then it
seems the smaller the lens openning the higher the resolution.
It is not-- because of diffraction.
The effect of diffraction on DISK OF CONFUSION and what is the optimum aperture at certain
distance is a topic for another technical article 
Is small lens opening-- large f stop better ?

