A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Nikon > Third-party Lenses > Tokina AT-X 300mm f2.8 AF II...

Featured Equipment Deals

Standing Out in a Sea of Competition Read More

Standing Out in a Sea of Competition

In a seemingly saturated industry such as wedding photography, how do you set your business apart and offer something truly unique? The talented Kristen Booth offers her insight to help you define...

Latest Equipment Articles

From Light to Ink: An Exhibit Using Canon's imagePROGRAF printers Read More

From Light to Ink: An Exhibit Using Canon's imagePROGRAF printers

"From Light to Ink" featured the work of Canon Inspirers and contest winners, all printed using Canon's imagePROGRAF printers. The gallery show revolved around the discussion of printing photographs...

Latest Learning Articles

Getting It Right in the Camera: The Imagination Game, Part 3 Read More

Getting It Right in the Camera: The Imagination Game, Part 3

Getting photographs right in the camera is a combination of using your imagination, creativity, art, and technique. In Part 3 of this three part series, we focus on shooting strategy and the role of...


Tokina AT-X 300mm f2.8 AF II SD on D70?

Eric . , Sep 08, 2004; 09:59 a.m.

Hello all,

Can anyone please tell me if the Tokina AT-X 300mm f/2.8 AF II SD will work on a D70? Do you know of any incompatibility issues?

How does this lens compare quality wise to the original Nikkor 300mm f/2.8 or f/4 lenses?

Thanks.

Responses

Tony Correa , Sep 08, 2004; 10:50 a.m.

FWIW, I had the original AF version of this lens. Build and optical quality was very good. Sold it when I came across a then very good deal on a Nikkor AFI lens with teleconverters. Had a chnace to compare them. I thought optically they were both very well matched when used by themselves. When used with teleconverters, that's when I saw the biggest difference. The Nikkor with it's dedicated TC1.4AFI was very good. The Tokina with a Tamron TC was just OK. Obviously the TC made a big difference: the Nikkor was a $500 TC, the Tamron, a $100 TC. Build quality: both were well made. The Nikkor definitely much high/better grade. Again we're talking about a $5000 lens vs. a $2000, so no surprise there. The built in AF motor of the Nikkor made shooting sports and the like a piece of cake. The Tokina on an F5 focused fast but not in the same league. This was more pronouced when using the inexpensive Tamron TC. If not shooting sports and the like and don't have need for TCs, I think the Tokina is a good value. the Sigma 120-300/2.8 also seems a good value but do not have any experince with it.

Eric . , Sep 08, 2004; 10:57 a.m.

Thanks Tony.

I heard of AF problems with some older lenses on DSLR, but do you know if the Tokina will work properly on a D70?

Tony Correa , Sep 08, 2004; 12:26 p.m.

The only one Tokina lens I've heard of that does not function fully is the ATX 400/5.6 AF which was discontinued years ago before the D70 or even the D100 came out. I think Tokina does offer a service to update the electronics. Have not heard of similar problems with other Tokinas, but you never know. If at all possible, check both out at a local dealer.

peter Koralis , Jan 28, 2008; 09:01 a.m.

Back to top

Notify me of Responses