A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Nikon > Nikon Lenses and Optics > Nikon 28-80 "D" vs "G"

Featured Equipment Deals

Advanced Printing with Lightroom (Video Tutorial) Read More

Advanced Printing with Lightroom (Video Tutorial)

Building upon last week's Basic Printing with Lightroom video tutorial, this advanced printing tutorial will teach you to print contact sheets, print multiple images at a time, use Lightroom's present...

Latest Equipment Articles

From Light to Ink: An Exhibit Using Canon's imagePROGRAF printers Read More

From Light to Ink: An Exhibit Using Canon's imagePROGRAF printers

"From Light to Ink" featured the work of Canon Inspirers and contest winners, all printed using Canon's imagePROGRAF printers. The gallery show revolved around the discussion of printing photographs...

Latest Learning Articles

How to Get the Most Out of a Photography Workshop Read More

How to Get the Most Out of a Photography Workshop

Attending a photography workshop can be a great way to take your images to the next level, but it can also be a big investment in time, money, and travel. By following these 7 simple tips, you can...


Nikon 28-80 "D" vs "G"

Robert De Anda , Feb 23, 2005; 02:33 a.m.

Since KEH has the "D" version pretty cheap, I was thinking of picking one up. I already have the "G" version and the build quality is very weak. I understand that the "D" is not pro build either, however, which one has the better build?

I am looking for something at least comparible to my 50 F/1.8 D.

Also, are there significant optical differences between the D & G?

Your feedback is greatly appreciated.

Responses

Jim Gifford , Feb 23, 2005; 07:20 a.m.

Robert,

Aside from the absence of an aperture ring on the "G" lens, you will be hard pressed to tell the difference.

Since you already have a "G" version, don't waste any money to get the "D" version.

This is not true of the G/D pair in the 70-300mm focal length, where at least the makeup of the optical elements is different -- better --in the D version with its ED glass.

But for the least expensive 28-80 lenses that Nikon has offered in three or more versions since the mid 1990s, I see no reason to "collect the whole set." The 28-100 is a kissing cousin to these, by the way. If you have any one of that batch, no need to spend money on any others in a vain hunt for improved performance.

If you want a step up, look into the 28-105 D lens, a terrific value in the Nikkor lineup.

Be well,

Bill Harris , Feb 25, 2005; 02:30 p.m.

I shoot with a D100..I have nothing but "D" type lens..I find it hard to believe that a "G" type or any other can beat the optics of a "D" type lens. They are extra sharp. In fact I just today from,E/Bay bought a super wide 20mm 2.8 "D" type lens to go along with the three others I have...They are much cheaper (used) than a newer "G"type and are just as good or better. Save youself a lot of money look around for "D" lens.

Back to top

Notify me of Responses