A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Nikon > Nikon Lenses and Optics > Nikon 28-80 "D" vs "G"

Featured Equipment Deals

Ten Steps to Get Creative & Authentic Family Photographs Read More

Ten Steps to Get Creative & Authentic Family Photographs

Photographer Stacy Bostrom shares ten tips to make your family photography more creative by capturing the beautiful imperfection of life.

Latest Equipment Articles

Sun Position Tracking Apps Read More

Sun Position Tracking Apps

These 5 apps, ranging in price from free to $8.99, are our top picks for tracking sun (and moon) light. Also ranging in complexity, some help you keep tabs on the ideal lighting of the day while...

Latest Learning Articles

Basic Image Development in Lightroom: Color Editing (Video Tutorial) Read More

Basic Image Development in Lightroom: Color Editing (Video Tutorial)

Learn basic HSL (hue, saturation, and luminance) color adjustments as well as split toning (adjusting color in highlights and lowlights) in this next video.


Nikon 28-80 "D" vs "G"

Robert De Anda , Feb 23, 2005; 02:33 a.m.

Since KEH has the "D" version pretty cheap, I was thinking of picking one up. I already have the "G" version and the build quality is very weak. I understand that the "D" is not pro build either, however, which one has the better build?

I am looking for something at least comparible to my 50 F/1.8 D.

Also, are there significant optical differences between the D & G?

Your feedback is greatly appreciated.

Responses

Jim Gifford , Feb 23, 2005; 07:20 a.m.

Robert,

Aside from the absence of an aperture ring on the "G" lens, you will be hard pressed to tell the difference.

Since you already have a "G" version, don't waste any money to get the "D" version.

This is not true of the G/D pair in the 70-300mm focal length, where at least the makeup of the optical elements is different -- better --in the D version with its ED glass.

But for the least expensive 28-80 lenses that Nikon has offered in three or more versions since the mid 1990s, I see no reason to "collect the whole set." The 28-100 is a kissing cousin to these, by the way. If you have any one of that batch, no need to spend money on any others in a vain hunt for improved performance.

If you want a step up, look into the 28-105 D lens, a terrific value in the Nikkor lineup.

Be well,

Bill Harris , Feb 25, 2005; 02:30 p.m.

I shoot with a D100..I have nothing but "D" type lens..I find it hard to believe that a "G" type or any other can beat the optics of a "D" type lens. They are extra sharp. In fact I just today from,E/Bay bought a super wide 20mm 2.8 "D" type lens to go along with the three others I have...They are much cheaper (used) than a newer "G"type and are just as good or better. Save youself a lot of money look around for "D" lens.

Back to top

Notify me of Responses