A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Nikon > Nikon Lenses and Optics > Nikon 28-80 "D" vs "G"

Featured Equipment Deals

Introduction to Lightroom Tabs: Develop (Video Tutorial) Read More

Introduction to Lightroom Tabs: Develop (Video Tutorial)

Learn how to use the Lightroom Develop Tab to ensure your image is just as you want it to be, including presents, tone curve, lens correction, and more!

Latest Equipment Articles

10 Stocking Stuffers under $50 Read More

10 Stocking Stuffers under $50

We've searched high and low to put together this list of 10 small photo-related gifts that any photography lover would be delighted to receive. No matter your budget, these are also fun to give (or...

Latest Learning Articles

State of the ART: The Little Lens That Could Read More

State of the ART: The Little Lens That Could

Fine art photographer Pete Myers talks about his love for the Cosina Voigtländer CV ULTRON 40mm SLii, a lens he considers to be "The Little Lens That Could."


Nikon 28-80 "D" vs "G"

Robert De Anda , Feb 23, 2005; 02:33 a.m.

Since KEH has the "D" version pretty cheap, I was thinking of picking one up. I already have the "G" version and the build quality is very weak. I understand that the "D" is not pro build either, however, which one has the better build?

I am looking for something at least comparible to my 50 F/1.8 D.

Also, are there significant optical differences between the D & G?

Your feedback is greatly appreciated.

Responses

Jim Gifford , Feb 23, 2005; 07:20 a.m.

Robert,

Aside from the absence of an aperture ring on the "G" lens, you will be hard pressed to tell the difference.

Since you already have a "G" version, don't waste any money to get the "D" version.

This is not true of the G/D pair in the 70-300mm focal length, where at least the makeup of the optical elements is different -- better --in the D version with its ED glass.

But for the least expensive 28-80 lenses that Nikon has offered in three or more versions since the mid 1990s, I see no reason to "collect the whole set." The 28-100 is a kissing cousin to these, by the way. If you have any one of that batch, no need to spend money on any others in a vain hunt for improved performance.

If you want a step up, look into the 28-105 D lens, a terrific value in the Nikkor lineup.

Be well,

Bill Harris , Feb 25, 2005; 02:30 p.m.

I shoot with a D100..I have nothing but "D" type lens..I find it hard to believe that a "G" type or any other can beat the optics of a "D" type lens. They are extra sharp. In fact I just today from,E/Bay bought a super wide 20mm 2.8 "D" type lens to go along with the three others I have...They are much cheaper (used) than a newer "G"type and are just as good or better. Save youself a lot of money look around for "D" lens.

Back to top

Notify me of Responses