A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Nikon > Nikon Lenses and Optics > Teleconverter for Nikkor...

Featured Equipment Deals

Latest Equipment Articles

4 Outdoor & Adventure Photo Packs Read More

4 Outdoor & Adventure Photo Packs

Photo packs have come a long way in the past decade, especially those that are targeted toward outdoor and adventure photographers. Alaska-based adventure photographer Dan Bailey takes a closer look...

Latest Learning Articles

Getting Started in Video Read More

Getting Started in Video

Photographer Ted Kawalerski made the transition from still to motion and has never looked back. Ted takes you through the steps to get started in a medium that will open your photography business to...


Teleconverter for Nikkor 80-400 VR Lens?

Fred Voetsch , Apr 12, 2005; 02:01 p.m.

I own and love the Nikkor 80-400 VR zoom lens and want to put a 2x extender on it but want to find the best match possible, regardless of price...any suggestions?

Fred Voetsch
Acclaim Images

Responses

Ravi Swamy , Apr 12, 2005; 02:25 p.m.

The Nikon autofocus system really needs an f5.6 aperture to work. With a 2x teleconverter you'll be at f11 and the autofocus won't work.

Ray Martin , Apr 12, 2005; 03:25 p.m.

Hi Fred, I'm in the same situation.

I have the Nikon 80-400mm VR and the AF-S 70-200 f/2.8 VR. I also have the Nikon TC-17E II teleconverter I purchsed just prior to the 80-400.

From what I've been reading the "Tamron SP AF Pro Tel-converters" should work fine and VR and AF should still be functional. Going with the 2x converter as mentioned, the AF will be useless.

I think going to a 1.4x would be more suited for the already slow 80-400, but that's just my opinion.

I tried the kenko pro version and it was a sloppy fit with my Nikon AF-D 80-200 f/2.8 and sent it back to Adorama. The lens would lose contact with the converter.

I'm looking to sell my Nikon TC-17E II and purchase the 1.4x Tamron Pro SP AF for my 80-400 VR. I think this would be the better choice.

Cheers!

Craig Bridge , Apr 12, 2005; 06:21 p.m.

The Tamron 1.4x SPAF TC (or Kenko pro) works well with the 80-400 VR. Depending on the body and lighting involved AF will be spotty (F100+MB15, D1/D2 series, F5 do better than others). The 80-400 with a 2x TC suffers image quality and usability issues.

Shun Cheung , Apr 12, 2005; 06:39 p.m.

With any 2x TC, your lens will become a 800mm/f11, which, IMO, is not very practical. A 400mm/f5.6 is iffy to begin with. If you must add a TC, I would stay with a 1.4x type.

Lex Jenkins , Apr 13, 2005; 04:47 a.m.

I agree with Shun. I tried the 80-400 VR yesterday and while I like the lens I wouldn't use it with a teleconverter - at least not more than a 1.4.

At 400mm with a maximum aperture of f/5.6 it needs fairly bright conditions or, in dim lighting, a reasonable amount of subject contrast, as well as a camera with fast AF to make it work well.

I found the lens fairly difficult to manually focus on my standard D2H screen. It's possible a replacement screen would improve manual focusing capabilities, but I got the D2H for its fast autofocus. I can always use my F3HP or FM2N if I want to manually focus.

If price really is no object, as you indicated (and if so, I envy you!), why not go for a faster prime in the 300mm-500mm range? Since I tend to use telezooms at the longest focal length, I'd rather have the 200/2 VR if I could afford it. Then a 2x teleconverter would be no problem.

Vince Resor , Apr 27, 2005; 10:38 p.m.

<p>I got into this thread a bit late, but I'm in a similar situation although I haven't bought the lens yet. I use a Tokina 400/5.6 and an old manual focus Kenko doubler to shoot really big moons and suns. On a D70 that equates to 1200 mm. Of course you have to have good eye sight to focus accurately, a really dead tripod and a bit of luck to get sharp images.</p>

<p>I willingly trade fast focus and a bright viewfinder for weight and cost. I don't want to afford the thousands of dollars for the fast 400/2.8 tele lens and even if I did, it wouldn't fit in my backpack or in my belt bag. For me, the 400/5.6 is an ideal compromise that fits well in my goals.</p>

<p>After a lot of study, the 80-400 VR will fit even better in my goals. Again, I'm willing to trade the focus speed on the VR and the flexibility of the zoom range. Of course I still will want the occasional big moon or big sun shot. From what I've read, that means the Kenko Pro 2x. No, it won't autofocus, but it will meter and I usually focus manually with the 400/5.6 anyway. Besides, it's the moon; it doesn't need autofocus.</p>


Sunset over the Sanibel Causeway

Vince Resor , Apr 27, 2005; 10:39 p.m.

Hmmm, sorry for the HTML tags.

Back to top

Notify me of Responses