A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Nikon > Nikon Lenses and Optics > nikkor vs. series e lens

Featured Equipment Deals

Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM A Review Read More

Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM A Review

Pro family photographer, Stacy Bostrom, reviews the Sigma 50mm f/1.4. See how this lens stacks up against her tried-and-true favorite.

Latest Equipment Articles

Choosing a Mobile Photo Printer Read More

Choosing a Mobile Photo Printer

In today's mobile, digital world, we carry hundreds or even thousands of pictures around on our smartphones and tablets. Tom Persinger looks at 4 different mobile photo printer options for getting...

Latest Learning Articles

Advanced Printing with Lightroom (Video Tutorial) Read More

Advanced Printing with Lightroom (Video Tutorial)

Building upon last week's Basic Printing with Lightroom video tutorial, this advanced printing tutorial will teach you to print contact sheets, print multiple images at a time, use Lightroom's present...


nikkor vs. series e lens

joanne gonzalez , Aug 28, 2006; 05:16 p.m.

i'm planning on getting a nikon 135mm f2.8 lens. however, on KEH i see that there's a nikkor and a series E. is there a big difference between them? should i go with nikkor or the series E? thanks a lot.

Responses


    1   |   2   |   3     Next    Last

ben conover , Aug 28, 2006; 05:30 p.m.

Hi, I think series E have a lesser reputation overall.

What's the price difference? Do you need to save money or get a better lens? Is the series E also a 2.8 lens?

Cheers.

Shun Cheung , Aug 28, 2006; 05:31 p.m.

Series E was Nikon's "economy" line from the late 1970's to 1980's. In today's terms, those are consumer-grade lenses. I cannot comment on the specifics about the 135mm, but generally speaking, Series E lenses are not as well built compared to the Nikkor AI lenses from the same era. Optically, most Series E lenses are fine.

Yaron Kidron , Aug 28, 2006; 05:49 p.m.

Some E's were single coated, and therefore flared a little more, or were not as saturated. They were also not backward compatible with pre-AI bodies. Their build level is fine (they're better built than current consumer lenses, more or less the same a pro AF lenses are built today). Optically, some E's are stunning: the 75-150E and the 100E are steals.

Wayne Cornell , Aug 28, 2006; 05:52 p.m.

Although the optics of the Series E lenses are, in some cases on par with the regular Nikkors, the build of the lenses isn't as good. The E Series marked the beginning of the plastic era that eventually spilled over into the pro lenses.

The E series 75-150mm zoom received especially high marks as does the 100mm and the 50mm f1.8. But they aren't as durable.

Michael Axel , Aug 28, 2006; 06:11 p.m.

The build quality was not nearly what you might expect from a regular Nikkor - more plastic parts as opposed to metal.

Roland Vink , Aug 28, 2006; 06:15 p.m.

Regarding the series-E 135/2.8, it is a good lens but I would pay a little more for the AI or AIS version. They are more solid to handle, a shade sharper, and they focus closer - 1.3m (4ft) compared to 1.5m (5ft). That extra foot at close range is suprisingly useful.

The only reason I would go for the series-E lens is if you are on a very tight budget, or want a smal light lens for travel and hiking. Even then, the diffence is not great - I'd go for an AI or AIS lens.

Edward Ingold , Aug 28, 2006; 06:19 p.m.

Series E lenses were one of Nikon's early ventures into the low-end consumer market. The build quality and (some suspect) the optical quality was compromised too much to endure. The only E lens with current standing is the 50/1.8, which has a cult following in these pages. Series E lenses, like the ill-fated Nikorex F and the Nash Rambler are models the manufacturer would like to forget.

Lee Hamiel , Aug 28, 2006; 06:52 p.m.

Interestingly enough the series E lenses were probably built to a higher standard than any of the consumer grade Nikkors today.

I own none of the series E lenses but was around when they were available new - the finish & weights were well below the Nikkor line. However - some of them have acheived legendary status which would have surprised me years ago but not now.

For the prices of 135 f/2.8 nikkors I would simply get the better of the two - that being the nikkor - may want to consider a 105 f/2.5 instead as it's a great performer & is hard to beat value wise.

Good luck & have fun

Lee Hamiel , Aug 28, 2006; 06:55 p.m.

I forgot the reference to add:

75-150 mm f/3.5 Nikon Series E Zoom is very well regarded by a lot of people.


    1   |   2   |   3     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses