Remote SB800 + D200 = Underexposure

Why are you using the built-in flash as commander while the SB-800 is mounted to the camera? This makes no sense as the built-in flash cannot raise properly with the SB-800 mounted. Besides, the SB-800 needs no commander when mounted directly to the camera.

If the SB-800 actually is mounted off-camera, try increasing it to +1 EV (or whatever is necessary), although this is slightly cumbersome to do via the D200 menus.

I'm not using the built-in flash as commander while the SB-800 is mounted to the camera. What I'm trying to say is this: SB800 on camera, all OK. SB800 off camera and used as remote with D200 sppedlight used as commander, all 1 stop unerexposed. Yes, increasing +1 EV fixes the problem, but it makes no sense that exposure is OK with the SB800 on camera and exposeure is 1 stop under with SB800 off camera with no settings changed except to change speedlight settings in the D200's menu.

I'm still a little confused by the question here. The remote SB-800 must be set to "Remote" not "TTL", and the same channel as the Commander ("Master").

I have the same experience. I got used to it and I simply dial +1EV in my D200 custom setting menu (e3) for a remote flash group A.

Regards, Marko

Thank you Marko, I do precisely the same thing to compensate. The question is why do we have to compenste, is there a flaw in the system or are we doing something wrong?

Where you locate your SB800 off-camera might have something to do with it. Where are you placing your speedlite when using as a remote?

BW, The first test I do is to hold the remote SB800 directly above the hot shoe to see if location has anythng to do with it. It doesn't. The object 6 feet away that was properly exposed when the SB800 was on camera is now -1 EV underexposed when the SB800 is remote and commanded by the built-in and sitting within an inch of the hot shoe. I've written Nikon about this and will post their answer if/when it comes.

Hi Ricardo, I haven't noticed the same problem with my D200 and SB800. Perhaps this is something that Nikon needs to adjust for you.

Well, so much for distance and angle being a culprit. I've got a shoot tomorrow, and will give it a go to see if I can duplicate your problem.