A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Nikon > Nikon Lenses and Optics > Teleconverter for AF-S 55-200...

Featured Equipment Deals

Publish Yourself - Photobooks Intro Read More

Publish Yourself - Photobooks Intro

Jeff Spirer introduced photographers to some of the photobook printing options available today

Latest Equipment Articles

Tamron 28-300mm F/3.5-6.3 DI VC PZD Lens Review Read More

Tamron 28-300mm F/3.5-6.3 DI VC PZD Lens Review

Are you looking for a lens that is ready for anything? Tamron recently released their 28-300mm F/3.5-6.3 DI VC PZD lens and they are calling it the "innovative all-in-one zoom."

Latest Learning Articles

Equipment Basics (Video Tutorial) Read More

Equipment Basics (Video Tutorial)

This video tutorial introduces the basic equipment--from extra lenses and tripods to reflectors and flashes--that you may want to invest in when getting started with your first DSLR.


Teleconverter for AF-S 55-200 VR

John Benning , Feb 16, 2008; 12:37 p.m.

Hi

Any suggestions on a teleconverter for a Nikon DX AF-S 55-200/4-5.6G VR lens on a D70?

many thanks

john

Responses

Stephen Kinosh , Feb 16, 2008; 01:13 p.m.

NONE:

YOu will NOT be happy with the results. That lens is slow to start with, and a 2X will make is an 8-11.2. And at that point, a tripod is mandatory.

Steve

Michael R. Freeman , Feb 16, 2008; 01:18 p.m.

I would suggest NONE. The AF-S 55-200mm f/4-5.6G VR lens is just not a good candidate for a teleconverter. Been there, done that (with similar lenses). It's too slow on the long end where you'll want to use it with a TC, which means an effective viewing aperture of f/8 with a 1.4x converter. That means spotty and erratic autofocus (or none at all), and very difficult manual focus because of the dim viewfinder image.

If you are determined to use a TC on this lens, then the Kenko Pro 300 1.4X or identical Tamron SP-AF 1.4X are probably your best option. Forget about trying a 2X - it will be virtually unusable on this lens.

Kent Staubus , Feb 16, 2008; 03:43 p.m.

Forget about it on that lens.

Kent in SD

John Benning , Feb 16, 2008; 03:54 p.m.

that's what I was afraid of. thanks all.

Roland Vink , Feb 17, 2008; 04:27 p.m.

If you want a longer lens, the 70-300VR is probably your best option.

Back to top

Notify me of Responses