Jerry Schuler , Jun 24, 2008; 10:22 p.m.
Which is the best (optically sharpest) version of the 50mm F/1.8. The AI, AI-s, AF, or AF D?
Jerry Schuler , Jun 24, 2008; 10:28 p.m.
One more question. When the ebay seller says their are "no scratches but cleaning marks" on the lens. Does those cleaning marks affect the image in any way?
Brian McWeeney , Jun 24, 2008; 10:36 p.m.
P. B. , Jun 24, 2008; 10:40 p.m.
The optical formula is the same for all of these lenses. Cleaning marks sounds kind of vague to me. I would want to see a photo of the glass taken with the right lighting to show the marks. I usually don't buy lenses with marks on the glass. Check with KEH.COM for this lens and get one without any marks.
Lex (perpendicularity consultant) Jenkins 

, Jun 24, 2008; 10:44 p.m.
If it's a knowledgeable, reputable seller, cleaning marks just means minor marks that at worst might make flare a problem in really adverse lighting (seldom a problem with the 50/1.8 due to the deeply recessed front element - the barrel itself serves as a lens shade).
If the seller is the slightest bit vague or evasive, assume that "cleaning marks" means "horrible, deep gouges suffered when fending off a Britney Spears umbrella attack." Move on to the next lens.
The 50/1.8 is such a good value it makes better sense to buy from KEH or another solid online vendor. Pay a few extra bucks and save peace of mind.
Matt Laur 

, Jun 24, 2008; 11:01 p.m.
Remember that a new one, as inexpensive as it is, will get you a 5-year warranty from Nikon. The newest version is
just as good as the older ones... but with less risk of damange to the lens coatings. A recent-vintage 50/1.8 would
have to be a real bargain before it would be worth going for a used one. Any damage to it - even vaguely
described "cleaning marks" - would be a show-stopper for me. Again, ONLY because of how inexpensive a new one
is. This may be the only lens where the math works out that way.
Stephen Lewis 
, Jun 24, 2008; 11:08 p.m.
Forget buying it if you need to ask about cleaning marks. Cleaning marks may contribute toward flare, which is generally an undesirable trait. They can be removed by certain professionals, but the process is expensive - figure around $200-300. A small scratch one can live with, particularly if it is on the front lens, because it can be filled in with black ink.
Lil Judd , Jun 24, 2008; 11:16 p.m.
Jerry - -
buy one from B&H or on Amazon.com - - about $ 100.00 and new with warranty. On a 50mm f/1.8 I see little reason to buy off eBay. Granted mine was bought used, but that's because I wanted one made in Japan....
JMHO
Lil :)
Jerry Schuler , Jun 24, 2008; 11:17 p.m.
I'm not concerned about the price at this range. I want a good one.
I had won an auction a couple weeks ago for a 50mm f/1.8" in excellent condition. The auction had no picture. I thought I'll risk it with a small bid. I won it for $20.00 bucks. The selling is not shipping it but giving me a run around. I think he's waiting for me to demand a refund. So I'm looking again.
Actually, I'm more interested in a wide angle prime. Like the 24mm or the 28mm.
Is there any difference in the image quality between 28mm f/2.8 and the 28mm f/3.5 lenses. I doubt I'd use those lower f/stops. I'd probably shoot at f/8 or higher for my close-up work.
Frank Skomial
, Jun 25, 2008; 01:39 a.m.
It those were only cleaning marks in a common sense of it, they should be easily removable, and no need to mention them. Most likely there is some damage there.