A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Nikon > Nikon Lenses and Optics > Nikkor 200mm F4 AI and Nikkor...

Featured Equipment Deals

Standing Out in a Sea of Competition Read More

Standing Out in a Sea of Competition

In a seemingly saturated industry such as wedding photography, how do you set your business apart and offer something truly unique? The talented Kristen Booth offers her insight to help you define...

Latest Equipment Articles

Nikon D750 Review Read More

Nikon D750 Review

Nikon introduced the D750, the first full-frame DSLR to feature a tilting LCD and built-in Wi-Fi, in September 2014. In this in-depth review Shun Cheung discusses the ins and outs of this new offering...

Latest Learning Articles

The September Monthly Project Read More

The September Monthly Project

This month's project with guest instructor Jackie DiBenedetto focuses on challenges - and joys! - of photographing kids. Add your best photo to the thread and enjoy the conversation!


Nikkor 200mm F4 AI and Nikkor 200mm F4 AF. Are they the same?

Jerry Schuler , Jul 05, 2008; 07:53 p.m.

Does the old Nikkor prime lens 200mm F4 AI which goes for $100 to $200 on ebay in mint condition have the same optical quality as the new Nikkor prime lens 200mm F4 AF which sells for $1400.00?

Responses

Michael Harris , Jul 05, 2008; 08:21 p.m.

Jerry I don't know the answer but I have one and it's very sharp. I sort of think there are 2 or 3 formulations if I remember correctly.

Michael Ferron , Jul 05, 2008; 10:15 p.m.

The good news is the old 200-4 is a gem of a lens and it's of a build quality you won't find anymore this side of Leica.

J Blakely , Jul 05, 2008; 10:33 p.m.

Just remember that depending on your camera, the older AI version might not meter.

Jeff Adler , Jul 05, 2008; 10:38 p.m.

These two lenses are completely different. The 200/4 AF you mention is a macro lens. There was an earlier manual focus version of this lens and it's very expensive too. The 200/4 AI is a conventional non-macro 200. Optically the 200/4 AI and 200/4 AIS are the same. There was also a 200/4 'K' lens which had the same optical formula as the AI and AIS models. The 'K' lens is the last pre-AI version and had a rubber coveed focusing ring. All of these lenses had the 5 Element/5 Group design. The earlier 200/4 Nikkors had a 4 Element/4 Group design and were longer. In my collection I have a 20CM/4, 200/4 Q, 200/4 QC and 200/4 AI. I know the AI lens is supposed to be better but my favorite is the 200/4 QC. It has excellent coating and feels much lighter than it looks.

Robert Hooper , Jul 05, 2008; 10:38 p.m.

The Nikkor 200mm f4 AI is a stellar performer. The lens it replaced, non-AI, was a dog. Make sure you don't have the old one that has been Ai'd.

Robert Hooper , Jul 05, 2008; 11:00 p.m.

I just checked this very informative site. Seems nikon snuck a non-AI in with the 5/5 optical formula for two years while I wasn't looking. I was meaning that the non-AI 4/4 formula was a dog, but it looks like Jeff will disagree with me. I remember the early 4/4 designs being very well made and pretty, but soft. Lenses with serial numbers at or above 670001 are the 5/5 design that I liked.

Jerry Schuler , Jul 06, 2008; 12:03 a.m.

Thank you guys. This has helped.

Peter Bielecki , Jul 06, 2008; 09:37 a.m.

I have the Ai and AiS versions of the 200/4 and also the Ai 200/4 Micro -- they are all fantastic performers. I tested all three and the Micro was a little softer but not by much. I'm selling on the Ai non-Micro just to clear out redundant lenses but the AiS 200/4 and the Micro 200/4 are definite keepers. Only reason I decided to sell the Ai is that it's a little older and focus ring a tiny bit loose compared to the AiS. The non-Micro is excellent for walking about with, very small lens for its focal length whereas the Micro is long and thin and stands out in a crowd :-) but the Micro is amazing, sharp and easy to focus from almost nothing to infinity!

Aaron Ng , Jul 10, 2008; 12:55 a.m.

I have the AI version 5/5 of this lens and it is great for the price. Optically it is good enough that you can match and exceed a 300mm f/4.5 non-AI (I have it and it is a dog) by just cropping the image from the 200mm f/4 down to 300mm.

Back to top

Notify me of Responses